Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-29 Thread J . W .
>>>Jan Willies schrieb am 29.06.2009 um 09:52: > Hi Joachim, > > Am 29.06.2009 09:49, schrieb J.W.: Well, I am not keen on doing this, but to get some progress I at least did >>> upload my git tree based on vdr-1.6.0-2 version of >>> git://vdr.gekrumbel.de/vdr.git to github: >>> >>> http://gith

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-29 Thread Jan Willies
Hi Joachim, Am 29.06.2009 09:49, schrieb J.W.: >> Well, I am not keen on doing this, but to get some progress I at least did >> upload my git tree based on vdr-1.6.0-2 version of >> git://vdr.gekrumbel.de/vdr.git to github: >> >> http://github.com/zzam/vdr/tree/stable >> git://github.com/zzam/vdr.

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-29 Thread J . W .
> Well, I am not keen on doing this, but to get some progress I at least did > upload my git tree based on vdr-1.6.0-2 version of > git://vdr.gekrumbel.de/vdr.git to github: > > http://github.com/zzam/vdr/tree/stable > git://github.com/zzam/vdr.git > Branch "stable" > > It contains up to now o

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-29 Thread J . W .
>>>Matthias Schwarzott schrieb am 28.06.2009 um 21:55: > On Samstag, 27. Juni 2009, Udo Richter wrote: >> On 25.06.2009 21:55, Ville Skyttä wrote: >> >> Hmmm, this could also be a great opportunity: Why not nominate someone >> >> as the official maintainer of the 1.6 stable branch? Someone who >>