Re: [vdr] *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption 1.4.2-1 Patch

2006-09-04 Thread Udo Richter
Udo Richter wrote: ==4652== Invalid free() / delete / delete[] ==4652==at 0x1B904B04: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:152) ==4652==by 0x8103F5F: cTimer::operator=(cTimer const) (timers.c:108) ==4652==by 0x80FE349: cSVDRP::CmdMODT(char const*) (svdrp.c:1136) ==4652==by 0x81015C1: cSVDRP

Re: [vdr] *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption 1.4.2-1 Patch

2006-09-04 Thread Udo Richter
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: It's probably best to implement an actual copy-constructor. Please try the attached patch, which contains both changes. Attached is the correct version. Thats the better fix of course, and may fix this in case some plugin did the same mistake. (couldn't find one in

Re: AW: [vdr] *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption 1.4.2-1 Patch

2006-09-04 Thread Udo Richter
martin wrote: just to let you know: the patch you attached here, did not solve the problem! My VDR crashed again. Just a few minutes too late... The patch had another bug that re-introduced the original problem once again. The new copy constructor did not initialize the aux pointer, and the

Re: AW: [vdr] *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption 1.4.2-1 Patch

2006-09-04 Thread Udo Richter
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: That'll teach me not to write code when I'm on my way out to the Biergarten... ;-) Next time, do it afterwards. Afterwards, code is much more 'fluently'. ;) Cheers, Udo ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org

Re: [vdr] xineliboutput: other rtp clients ?

2006-09-02 Thread Udo Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm the happy user of xineliboutput 1.0.0pre3. I'd like to know if it's possible for other rtp clients to play the multicast stream. (while xine+xineliboutput is playing it) In fact i'd like to be able to use vlc to transcode/re-stream it. I've tried, and was

Re: [vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

2006-08-26 Thread Udo Richter
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: So how shall we distinguish between cReceivers that do actual recordings and such that just receive, e.g., teletext data? Or those that receive a radio channel for streaming it to a remote client? Where's the limit? Is there a way to predict whether receiving a channel

Re: [vdr] Sudden vdr restarts almost continuously

2006-08-23 Thread Udo Richter
Jukka Palko wrote: I have been running vdr 1.4 version with rather good success for some time now, but now all of a sudden I have started getting almost continuous restarting of vdr. Aug 23 09:31:11 sempron vdr: [16318] ERROR: video data stream broken Cards in machine are: # lspci -v -s 0a.0

Re: [vdr] Sudden vdr restarts almost continuously

2006-08-23 Thread Udo Richter
Jukka Palko wrote: I doublechecked things on the host a while back and looks like the cause is clock adjustment. :) After disabling the adjustment from transmissions, the continuous restarting ended. Propably ain't got the priviledges set up properly. ;) Aug 23 10:00:32 sempron vdr: [19692]

Re: [vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

2006-08-20 Thread Udo Richter
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: @Martin: any news on this? With recent drivers and firmware it should be possible to record and watch even the high-bandwidth channels like ZDF on a FF card. Question is, how recent. I'm just running a recording on ARD. vdr-1.4.1-5, DVB driver of kernel 2.6.16.19,

Re: [vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

2006-08-20 Thread Udo Richter
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: Udo Richter wrote: Lots of transfer buffer overflows and sluggish OSD, because VDR used the primary FF card for recording, while the secondary budget card is idle. System is back to normal if I switch to another channel. Just tested it by recording ARD from

Re: [vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

2006-08-20 Thread Udo Richter
Anssi Hannula wrote: Consider this scenario: - user watches channel 1, transponder 1, via FF - recording starts for channel 1, transponder 1, via FF add here: - live view is interrupted as FF switches to transfer mode - recording starts for channel 2, transponder 2, via budget The primary

Re: [vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

2006-08-20 Thread Udo Richter
Jörn Reder wrote: Hmm, it's not that easy because it ignores the original intention of this thread. Not really. The side effect that osdteletext will force recordings on the FF card on the same transponder was caused by the change in 1.4.1-2, that was some time before your post. Its going

Re: [vdr] next developper version

2006-08-11 Thread Udo Richter
VDR User wrote: Klaus, any particular reason you're not releasing the TODO list? Probably to keep expectations down. If feature X is on the todo list, then it might be implemented next week. Or next month. Or next year. Or in 5 years. Or never. But people will for sure ask every week 'when

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR maintenance patch 1.4.1-3

2006-08-06 Thread Udo Richter
e9hack wrote: after applying the patch, I get many entries (30 per second) in the syslog: Aug 6 23:20:23 very-new-darkstar vdr: [11415] ERROR (svdrp.c,84): Address already in use The svdrp server port (default 2001) is in use by another program, in other words, there's another VDR instance

<    1   2   3   4   5