Le lundi 28 septembre 2015 à 18:30 +0200, fnu a écrit :
> ok, two points just for my couriousity.
>
> 1. Why don't you share channels.conf from your server as you do it with EPG
> data?
I did, but this channel.conf is very old, and lack some channels. I
wanted to take the chance to update it.
Le lundi 28 septembre 2015 à 12:55 +0200, fnu a écrit :
> per specs channel scan is not inteded for the SAT>IP servers, this is
> client's responsibility.
I fully understand this point, but since the Octopus has a web interface
and apparently also acts as a DLNA DMS, I think it could be a nice
Nicolas,
ok, two points just for my couriousity.
1. Why don't you share channels.conf from your server as you do it with EPG
data?
2. Why don't you enable EPG scan just for a few hours for the channels scan and
delete epg.data afterwards again?
By chance I tested the same a couple of days ago
Hi Nicolas,
per specs channel scan is not inteded for the SAT>IP servers, this is client's
responsibility.
VDR doesn't provide an active channel scan option, so don't blame and point
just the plugin, which does run awesome stable here since spring 2014.
VDR does provide a passive channel
Hi.
You can try this
http://linuxdvb.org.ru/wbb/index.php?page=Thread=26946#post26946
This is reelchannelscan fork, it can scan on sat>ip device.
В Пн, 28/09/2015 в 12:18 +0200, Nicolas Huillard пишет:
> Thanks for all your answers !
>
> I finally opted for the Digital Devices Octopus Net,
Thanks for all your answers !
I finally opted for the Digital Devices Octopus Net, which DVT-T2 tuners
are equipped with Sony D2837ER demodulators, which happen to completely
solve the bad reception issue. Great !
Now I have a whole new set of problems : SAT>IP (with the satip plugin
which seems
