Re: [vdr] Defunct screensaver processes under Xine

2008-04-16 Thread Todd Luliak
>> In file included from i386/dsputil_mmx.c:30: >> i386/mmx.h:24:2: warning: #warning Everything in this header is deprecated, >> use plain asm()! New code using this header will be rejected. >> i386/h264dsp_mmx.c: In function `put_h264_qpel4_h_lowpass_3dnow': >> i386/h264dsp_mmx.c:1881: error: can

Re: [vdr] Defunct screensaver processes under Xine

2008-04-16 Thread Morfsta
> In file included from i386/dsputil_mmx.c:30: > i386/mmx.h:24:2: warning: #warning Everything in this header is deprecated, > use plain asm()! New code using this header will be rejected. > i386/h264dsp_mmx.c: In function `put_h264_qpel4_h_lowpass_3dnow': > i386/h264dsp_mmx.c:1881: error: can't fi

Re: [vdr] Defunct screensaver processes under Xine

2008-04-15 Thread Todd Luliak
>...provide some more lines from above it. It looks like it bombs right about here: (hope it's enough...) in: make -C ffmpeg/libavcodec libavcodec.a ... In file included from i386/dsputil_mmx.c:30: i386/mmx.h:24:2: warning: #warning Everything in this header is deprecated, use plain asm()! New

Re: [vdr] Defunct screensaver processes under Xine

2008-04-15 Thread Morfsta
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Todd Luliak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I don't "need" Gnome and am looking into alternatives per your > suggestion. I hate the idea of having to run a display manager at all, but > the picture looks too good to back out now. ;) > You don't need a display man

Re: [vdr] Defunct screensaver processes under Xine

2008-04-15 Thread Todd Luliak
>Do you need to run gnome at all? Its quite processor intensive if all >you are doing is using it to watch TV. See the other recent thread on >starting VDR/xine at boot time using startx / replacing the session >manager and those problems with gnome screensaver won't be apparent. > >Also, there is

Re: [vdr] Defunct screensaver processes under Xine

2008-04-15 Thread Morfsta
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Todd Luliak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'd be happy if the screensaver never ran again, as it's of no use here > whatsoever. > Where do I begin looking to curb the creation of these zombies? > Do you need to run gnome at all? Its quite processor intensive if

[vdr] Defunct screensaver processes under Xine

2008-04-14 Thread Todd Luliak
I've been running VDR with a FF card so I'm new to the xine-pluginmethod of running things. I find that the VDR machine is creating avery large number of defunct screensaver processes under Xine-UI. Theydo not clear until Xine is stopped and though they do not take up anysystem resources, they c