On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Udo Richter wrote:
> However, this is not a concern for VDR or for this patch. Its ok for VDR
> to look ahead, and not to carry endless compatibility hacks with it.
I couldn't agree more. I cant stand when something is bloated down
with that, just because some us
Am 30.01.2010 12:12, schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Sorry, I do not know if I understood you correctly. Do you mean that
> some other plugins (which are not shipped with VDR, i. e. the patch does
> not need to be changed in that regard) need to use `-include
> $(VDRDIR)/Make.global` instead of `include $(V
Am Samstag, den 30.01.2010, 11:57 +0100 schrieb Udo Richter:
> Am 28.01.2010 22:52, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
> > On Thursday 28 January 2010, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >
> >> Therefore include strictly necessary options in `Make.global` and include
> >> this in all the Makefiles before `Make.config`.
> >
Am 28.01.2010 22:52, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
> On Thursday 28 January 2010, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
>> Therefore include strictly necessary options in `Make.global` and include
>> this in all the Makefiles before `Make.config`.
>
> If these options are strictly necessary, shouldn't the leading "-" be
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Therefore include strictly necessary options in `Make.global` and include
> this in all the Makefiles before `Make.config`.
If these options are strictly necessary, shouldn't the leading "-" be dropped
from all "-include $(VDRDIR)/Make.global" l
