Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-19 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 19.02.2013 23:14, Juergen Lock wrote: In article <5123ead9.7050...@tvdr.de> you write: On 19.02.2013 21:32, Juergen Lock wrote: In article <51235356.60...@tvdr.de> you write: On 19.02.2013 11:19, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: On 18.02.2013 23:51, Juergen Lock wrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 04:

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-19 Thread Juergen Lock
In article <5123ead9.7050...@tvdr.de> you write: >On 19.02.2013 21:32, Juergen Lock wrote: >> In article <51235356.60...@tvdr.de> you write: >>> On 19.02.2013 11:19, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: On 18.02.2013 23:51, Juergen Lock wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Juergen Lock w

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-19 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 19.02.2013 21:35, Juergen Lock wrote: In article <51234507.6090...@tvdr.de> you write: On 19.02.2013 01:48, Juergen Lock wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:52:31PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: On 18.02.2013 23:43, Juergen Lock wrote: In article <5121fba4.2050...@tvdr.de> you write: On 1

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-19 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 19.02.2013 21:32, Juergen Lock wrote: In article <51235356.60...@tvdr.de> you write: On 19.02.2013 11:19, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: On 18.02.2013 23:51, Juergen Lock wrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Juergen Lock w

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-19 Thread Juergen Lock
In article <51234507.6090...@tvdr.de> you write: >On 19.02.2013 01:48, Juergen Lock wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:52:31PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >>> On 18.02.2013 23:43, Juergen Lock wrote: In article <5121fba4.2050...@tvdr.de> you write: > On 16.02.2013 16:46, Juergen Lock

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-19 Thread Juergen Lock
In article <51235356.60...@tvdr.de> you write: >On 19.02.2013 11:19, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> On 18.02.2013 23:51, Juergen Lock wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > Hi! > > [...]

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-19 Thread Juergen Lock
In article <51234977.2040...@tvdr.de> you write: >On 19.02.2013 01:48, Juergen Lock wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:52:31PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >>> On 18.02.2013 23:43, Juergen Lock wrote: In article <5121fba4.2050...@tvdr.de> you write: > On 16.02.2013 16:46, Juergen Lock

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-19 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 19.02.2013 11:19, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: On 18.02.2013 23:51, Juergen Lock wrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: Hi! [...] 3. Running with these four tuners (dual DVB-T and the bonded two DVB-

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-19 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 18.02.2013 23:51, Juergen Lock wrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: Hi! [...] 3. Running with these four tuners (dual DVB-T and the bonded two DVB-S2) I get two different deadlocks waiting f

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-19 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 19.02.2013 01:48, Juergen Lock wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:52:31PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: On 18.02.2013 23:43, Juergen Lock wrote: In article <5121fba4.2050...@tvdr.de> you write: On 16.02.2013 16:46, Juergen Lock wrote: Hi! Now that I have a spare DVB-S2 tuner (TechniS

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-19 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 19.02.2013 10:25, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: ... BTW: you sent your original posting "To" me and "Cc"d the VDR-ML. Therefore my reply inadvertently only went to you and not to the list. I'm no replying explicitly to the s/no/now/ Those stupid typos appear to be contageous... ;-) Klaus li

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-19 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 19.02.2013 01:48, Juergen Lock wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:52:31PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: On 18.02.2013 23:43, Juergen Lock wrote: In article <5121fba4.2050...@tvdr.de> you write: On 16.02.2013 16:46, Juergen Lock wrote: Hi! Now that I have a spare DVB-S2 tuner (TechniS

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-18 Thread Juergen Lock
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > > Hi! > > > > [...] > > > 3. Running with these four tuners (dual DVB-T and the bonded two DVB-S2) > >I get two different deadlocks waiting for cDvbTuner::bondMutex

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-18 Thread Juergen Lock
In article <5121fba4.2050...@tvdr.de> you write: >On 16.02.2013 16:46, Juergen Lock wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Now that I have a spare DVB-S2 tuner (TechniSat SkyStar USB HD >> (adapter2); the others on this box are atm Hauppauge Nova-TD model >> 1172 (adapter 0+1) and TechnoTrend S2-3600 (adapter3) - a

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-18 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 16.02.2013 16:46, Juergen Lock wrote: Hi! Now that I have a spare DVB-S2 tuner (TechniSat SkyStar USB HD (adapter2); the others on this box are atm Hauppauge Nova-TD model 1172 (adapter 0+1) and TechnoTrend S2-3600 (adapter3) - all USB) I decided to play with vdr device bonding. I discover

Re: [vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-17 Thread Juergen Lock
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > Hi! > > [...] > 3. Running with these four tuners (dual DVB-T and the bonded two DVB-S2) >I get two different deadlocks waiting for cDvbTuner::bondMutex >after live viewing a DVB-T(!) channel for longer (OSD doesn't >reac