Arthur Konovalov wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>
>> Can you narrow down which of these three changes is actually necessary
>> to make it work?
> I can repeat tests tomorrow, but I recall that this (it was first change):
>
>>state = 4; // normal operation
>> + repliesToQuery = true
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Can you narrow down which of these three changes is actually necessary
> to make it work?
I can repeat tests tomorrow, but I recall that this (it was first change):
>state = 4; // normal operation
> + repliesToQuery = true; //AK
>}
and this (next cha
On 04/15/08 14:33, Arthur Konovalov wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>> Does the log really end at that point?
>>
>> If there is no "Ca Pmt Reply" then the CAM doesn't reply to
>> the query.
>
> That is, no reply in this point.
> Because I got second confirmation from TechniSat Support about mult
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Does the log really end at that point?
If there is no "Ca Pmt Reply" then the CAM doesn't reply to
the query.
That is, no reply in this point.
Because I got second confirmation from TechniSat Support about multiple
decryption possibility, I made small test changes in
On 04/12/08 23:09, Arthur Konovalov wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> > Please start a new thread for a new topic ( I've at least changed the
> subject).
> >
> Yes, You are right. Sorry.
>
> > Please activate the DumpTPDUDataTransfer and DebugProtocol switches
> in ci.c
> > and check wheth
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Please start a new thread for a new topic ( I've at least changed the
subject).
>
Yes, You are right. Sorry.
> Please activate the DumpTPDUDataTransfer and DebugProtocol switches
in ci.c
> and check whether VDR receives a reply to its QUERY.
Honestly, I don't unders
