Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] Copy reviewer scores on trivial rebase/commit msg changes
On 18/01/14 01:48 +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: I'd like to enable these - comments welcome: 1. label.Label-Name.copyAllScoresOnTrivialRebase If true, all scores for the label are copied forward when a new patch set is uploaded that is a trivial rebase. A new patch set is considered as trivial rebase if the commit message is the same as in the previous patch set and if it has the same code delta as the previous patch set. This is the case if the change was rebased onto a different parent. This can be used to enable sticky approvals, reducing turn-around for trivial rebases prior to submitting a change. Defaults to false. 2. label.Label-Name.copyAllScoresIfNoCodeChange If true, all scores for the label are copied forward when a new patch set is uploaded that has the same parent commit as the previous patch set and the same code delta as the previous patch set. This means only the commit message is different. This can be used to enable sticky approvals on labels that only depend on the code, reducing turn-around if only the commit message is changed prior to submitting a change. Defaults to false. I am a bit late to the party but +1 from me for trying both. I guess it will be quite rare that something bad happens here. So unlikely, that the time saved on all the previous patches will far offset the lost time for fixing the corner cases. ___ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] Copy reviewer scores on trivial rebase/commit msg changes
On 01/19/2014 02:48 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 01:48:52AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: I'd like to enable these - comments welcome: 1. label.Label-Name.copyAllScoresOnTrivialRebase If true, all scores for the label are copied forward when a new patch set is uploaded that is a trivial rebase. A new patch set is considered as trivial rebase if the commit message is the same as in the previous patch set and if it has the same code delta as the previous patch set. This is the case if the change was rebased onto a different parent. This can be used to enable sticky approvals, reducing turn-around for trivial rebases prior to submitting a change. Defaults to false. 2. label.Label-Name.copyAllScoresIfNoCodeChange If true, all scores for the label are copied forward when a new patch set is uploaded that has the same parent commit as the previous patch set and the same code delta as the previous patch set. This means only the commit message is different. This can be used to enable sticky approvals on labels that only depend on the code, reducing turn-around if only the commit message is changed prior to submitting a change. Defaults to false. https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/config-labels.html I think that the time saved by these copying is worth the dangers. But is there a way to tell a human ack from an ack auto-copied by these options? It's not so fair to blame X for X approved this patch when he only approved a very similar version thereof. we'll find out when we enable it. Assuming that a clean rebase can do no wrong is sometimes wrong (a recent example is detailed by Nir's http://gerrit.ovirt.org/21649/ ) of course it can do wrong, but that's the exception usually. ___ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] Copy reviewer scores on trivial rebase/commit msg changes
On 01/19/2014 11:49 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote: - Original Message - From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com To: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com Cc: engine-devel engine-de...@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 10:20:33 AM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Copy reviewer scores on trivial rebase/commit msg changes On 01/19/2014 02:48 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 01:48:52AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: I'd like to enable these - comments welcome: 1. label.Label-Name.copyAllScoresOnTrivialRebase If true, all scores for the label are copied forward when a new patch set is uploaded that is a trivial rebase. A new patch set is considered as trivial rebase if the commit message is the same as in the previous patch set and if it has the same code delta as the previous patch set. This is the case if the change was rebased onto a different parent. This can be used to enable sticky approvals, reducing turn-around for trivial rebases prior to submitting a change. Defaults to false. 2. label.Label-Name.copyAllScoresIfNoCodeChange If true, all scores for the label are copied forward when a new patch set is uploaded that has the same parent commit as the previous patch set and the same code delta as the previous patch set. This means only the commit message is different. This can be used to enable sticky approvals on labels that only depend on the code, reducing turn-around if only the commit message is changed prior to submitting a change. Defaults to false. https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/config-labels.html I think that the time saved by these copying is worth the dangers. But is there a way to tell a human ack from an ack auto-copied by these options? It's not so fair to blame X for X approved this patch when he only approved a very similar version thereof. I think the ideas are good, regarding a way to mark if this is human ack or not - can the process of copying post a comment that copying occurred? we'll see when enabled it. I plan to do that tuesday if no strong objections will arise. we'll find out when we enable it. Assuming that a clean rebase can do no wrong is sometimes wrong (a recent example is detailed by Nir's http://gerrit.ovirt.org/21649/ ) of course it can do wrong, but that's the exception usually. ___ Engine-devel mailing list engine-de...@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel ___ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] Copy reviewer scores on trivial rebase/commit msg changes
- Original Message - From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com To: Antoni Segura Puimedon asegu...@redhat.com, Greg Sheremeta gsher...@redhat.com Cc: engine-devel engine-de...@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:49:45 PM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] [vdsm] Copy reviewer scores on trivial rebase/commit msg changes On 01/18/2014 01:39 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: - Original Message - From: Greg Sheremeta gsher...@redhat.com To: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com Cc: engine-devel engine-de...@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 1:35:57 AM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] [vdsm] Copy reviewer scores on trivial rebase/commit msg changes - Original Message - From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com To: engine-devel engine-de...@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 6:48:52 PM Subject: [vdsm] Copy reviewer scores on trivial rebase/commit msg changes I'd like to enable these - comments welcome: 1. label.Label-Name.copyAllScoresOnTrivialRebase If true, all scores for the label are copied forward when a new patch set is uploaded that is a trivial rebase. A new patch set is considered as trivial rebase if the commit message is the same as in the previous patch set and if it has the same code delta as the previous patch set. This is the case if the change was rebased onto a different parent. This can be used to enable sticky approvals, reducing turn-around for trivial rebases prior to submitting a change. Defaults to false. 2. label.Label-Name.copyAllScoresIfNoCodeChange If true, all scores for the label are copied forward when a new patch set is uploaded that has the same parent commit as the previous patch set and the same code delta as the previous patch set. This means only the commit message is different. This can be used to enable sticky approvals on labels that only depend on the code, reducing turn-around if only the commit message is changed prior to submitting a change. Defaults to false. Do the above apply to verify+1? Cause I'd handle that separately. Verification should be done even after trivial rebase. we can decide for which label. for example, we can decide just changing the commit message doesn't clear the verification flag, but changing the code does require re-verification. That sounds great. https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/config-labels.html ___ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel +1 from me on both. I think they're great features. ___ Engine-devel mailing list engine-de...@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel ___ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] Copy reviewer scores on trivial rebase/commit msg changes
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 01:48:52AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: I'd like to enable these - comments welcome: 1. label.Label-Name.copyAllScoresOnTrivialRebase If true, all scores for the label are copied forward when a new patch set is uploaded that is a trivial rebase. A new patch set is considered as trivial rebase if the commit message is the same as in the previous patch set and if it has the same code delta as the previous patch set. This is the case if the change was rebased onto a different parent. This can be used to enable sticky approvals, reducing turn-around for trivial rebases prior to submitting a change. Defaults to false. 2. label.Label-Name.copyAllScoresIfNoCodeChange If true, all scores for the label are copied forward when a new patch set is uploaded that has the same parent commit as the previous patch set and the same code delta as the previous patch set. This means only the commit message is different. This can be used to enable sticky approvals on labels that only depend on the code, reducing turn-around if only the commit message is changed prior to submitting a change. Defaults to false. https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/config-labels.html I think that the time saved by these copying is worth the dangers. But is there a way to tell a human ack from an ack auto-copied by these options? It's not so fair to blame X for X approved this patch when he only approved a very similar version thereof. Assuming that a clean rebase can do no wrong is sometimes wrong (a recent example is detailed by Nir's http://gerrit.ovirt.org/21649/ ) Dan. ___ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
