On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:31:02AM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
> Hi,
> I was installing the VDSM packaging following this link:
> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Installing_VDSM_from_rpm
>
> It seems that the network configuration section is not correct. In
> this wiki page, the static IP is assigned to
- Original Message -
> On 02/12/2012 02:50 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 03:23:19PM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> -1
> >>>
> >>> I agree that for messaging environment having a Message ID is a
> >>> must
> >>> because you som
On 02/13/2012 07:28 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
Technically I disagree, this is a cross cutting concern which has nothing to do
with any specific call hence it should be passed as a header, that is actually
rather elegant.
Overloading a header with this? Seems like a clunky bolt on to me.
Further,
On 02/13/2012 02:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
...
is that it (ab)uses an http header for carrying FlowID,
Yes, it certainly does appear to overload it. I would be nice to
have
something formal given to it by engine, but I can appreciate the
difficulty implementing such a scheme.
Technically I
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "Ayal Baron"
> Cc: "VDSM Project Development"
> Sent: Monday, 13 February, 2012 6:55:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] flowID schema
>
> On 02/13/2012 02:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
> ...
> >>> is that it (ab)uses an http header for carrying
On 02/13/2012 12:52 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
...
if the FlowID isn't logged for logs which are part of the action, it
will be easy to detect the entry point.
but still wouldn't make it easy to grep all related logs to a flow
If the flow id is present in all lines it would make the log a lot less
- Original Message -
> On 02/13/2012 02:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
> ...
> >>> is that it (ab)uses an http header for carrying FlowID,
> >> Yes, it certainly does appear to overload it. I would be nice to
> >> have
> >> something formal given to it by engine, but I can appreciate the
>
