On 12/04/2012 11:52 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and I think it's
time to talk a bit.
I will purposefully try and keep implementation details away and concentrate
about how the API looks and how you use it.
First major change is in
On 12/07/2012 09:53 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
...
connectStorageRepository(repoId, repoFormat,
connectionParameters={}):
repoId - is a transient name that will be used to refer to the
connected domain, it is not persisted and doesn't have to be the
same across the cluster.
repoFormat -
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org,
engine-devel engine-de...@ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 6:18:13 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On 12/04/2012 11:52 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API
and
I think it's time to talk a bit.
I will purposefully try and keep implementation details away and
concentrate about how the API looks
@lists.fedorahosted.org, Deepak C Shetty
deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 11:40:01 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On 12/08/2012 01:23 AM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Deepak C Shetty deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi
@lists.fedorahosted.org, Deepak C Shetty
deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 12:23:15 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On 12/06/2012 10:22 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Shu Ming shum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc
: Thursday, December 6, 2012 11:02:02 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
Saggi,
Thanks for sharing your thought and I get some comments below.
Saggi Mizrahi:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and
I think it's time to talk a bit.
I
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:53:41PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
snip
1) Can you provide more info on why there is a exception for 'lvm
based
block domain'. Its not coming out clearly.
File based domains are responsible for syncing up object
-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 1:49:31 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:53:41PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
snip
1) Can you provide more info on why there is a exception for 'lvm
based
block domain'. Its
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 03:36:23PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
Statements like this make me start to worry about your userData
concept. It's a
sign of a bad API if the user needs to invent a custom metadata
scheme for
itself. This reminds me of the abomination that is the 'custom'
: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 03:36:23PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
Statements like this make me start to worry about your userData
concept. It's a
sign of a bad API if the user needs to invent a custom metadata
scheme for
itself. This reminds me
10, 2012 1:39:51 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:52:01AM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Shu Ming shum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 12:23:15 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On 12/06/2012 10:22 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Shu Ming shum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development
vdsm
Saggi,
Thanks for sharing your thought and I get some comments below.
Saggi Mizrahi:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and I think it's
time to talk a bit.
I will purposefully try and keep implementation details away and concentrate
about how the API looks and
- Original Message -
From: Tony Asleson tasle...@redhat.com
To: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 4:48:34 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On 12/04/2012 03:52 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new
- Original Message -
From: Shu Ming shum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org,
engine-devel engine-de...@ovirt.org
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 11:02:02 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New
:02 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
Saggi,
Thanks for sharing your thought and I get some comments below.
Saggi Mizrahi:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and
I think it's time to talk a bit.
I will purposefully try and keep implementation details away
On 12/04/2012 03:52 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and I think
it's time to talk a bit.
I will purposefully try and keep implementation details away and concentrate
about how the API looks and how you use it.
First major change is
Thanks for sharing this. It's nice to have something a little more concrete to
think about. Just a few comments and questions inline to get some discussion
flowing.
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 04:52:40PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and
- Original Message -
From: Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org,
engine-devel engine-de...@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:08:25 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
20 matches
Mail list logo
