Hi
Have being using VBR and have installed a OpsCenter test system.
But can't seem to locate what was called tape explorer in VBR which showed
the tape drives in use over time which we use to plan new backups
Regards
Michael
___
Veritas-bu maillist -
Hello Team,
We are running Netbackup 4.5FP_3ga on two linux boxes with verion Linux
2.2.7-1.23smp.
Is Linux 2.2.7-1.23smp compatible with netbackup 6.5 as I am getting too less
throughput .
Please advise.
thanks,
Pranav Batra
I'm pretty sure NBU 6.5 doesn't support any kernel earlier than 2.4.
You appear to have an ancient 2.2 multiprocessor kernel. I'm assuming
the version you posted is what is showing up in your uname -a output?
2.4 kernel was pretty much replaced by 2.6 kernel around 2006/2007 and
only God
I can't speak to your specific linux kernel and I did not test with 6.5,
but I specifically keep an old 5.1 master around to pickup my legacy 3.x
and 4.5 NetBackup clients. In my testing, compatibility with 6.0 MP4 was
mixed. Some older clients would work, others failed completely. The
whole thing
LOL I had my old 3.4 server since 2001 and clients 3.4
Some were still working on the old 5.1 up until last year. I still have
5.1 clients running under 7.0.0
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf
No clue. When I started here 5 years ago we were running 5.1 in
production. I've handled the 6.0, 6.5, and soon 7.0 upgrades. I setup
the legacy 5.1 master to pick up a bunch of orphaned clients from a
dead 4.5 master another group managed. Occasionally while cleaning out
an old storage closet, I
I have an Axxion NetBackup 1.7 client, will that work with 6.5? :)
Regards,
Patrick Whelan
VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for UNIX.
VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for Windows.
netbac...@whelan-consulting.co.uk
-Original Message-
From:
A couple versions back, both versions of OS versions of NetBackup,
there were problems SSO sharing tape drives with Windows boxes. While
officially supported many people reported problems with device
ownership. Windows was somewhat grabby and liked to possess shared
devices rather than happily
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Donaldson, Mark mark.donald...@staples.com
wrote:
A couple versions back, both versions of OS versions of NetBackup,
there were problems SSO sharing tape drives with Windows boxes. While
officially supported many people reported problems with device
We occasionally get an sso drive locked on our win2003 system, but it's always
the netapp that won't let the drive go.
David Spearman
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Wednesday-02-March- 2011 11:43
I've tried it (Linux RHEL master) with some SAN media server types running
Windows.
I've had mixed success, but I'm suspecting it's a configuration issue.
My setup scrambles the tape inventory, so I get a horde of frozen tapes because
it gets mismatched between what it thinks is the right
We have a media/master server in production at the datacenter and are
preparing to stand up a single media server in the office. Each will
have their own library. What is the best method to utilize our off-site
tape vaulting from the datacenter, for the office? In the past we've
rsync'd a few
For all of our remote offices, we are about to roll out NBU 7 media servers
with no tape, but an internal disk storage unit. The backups will be written
to this disk, deduplicated, then replicated back to a deduplicated storage
unit at the main data centre, where they can potentially be duplicated
13 matches
Mail list logo
