[Veritas-bu] Issues with media server dedupe pools / replication / restores ??

2012-02-23 Thread Mark Glazerman
I'm wondering if anyone has observed strange behavior like this with regard to media server dedupe pools and associated replication and restores. Here's our scenario... We have 2 media server dedupe pools setup. One hangs off a local media server. The other hangs off a media server at

Re: [Veritas-bu] Issues with media server dedupe pools / replication / restores ??

2012-02-23 Thread stefanos
Typical, The DR media server is trying to read the primary image from the primary storage server are send it back to the primary client. One way to resolve this is to use the media host override option. Another way is to delete the DR media server from the primary storage server and

Re: [Veritas-bu] Issues with media server dedupe pools / replication / restores ??

2012-02-23 Thread Mark Glazerman
Stefanos, We understand that the typical behavior or NBU is to look for the primary image on the primary storage and to look to restore it to the primary client. That is what we want to occur with each of these restore attempts. We will only ever want the remote media server to handle

Re: [Veritas-bu] Quantum i6000 tape cleaning tickets not clearing

2012-02-23 Thread Jim VandeVegt
I seldom get on the library GUI and close them, and it *never* closes them itself. Eventually it will have a Clean Periodic open for each of the five drives (they are HP LTO5 drives if that makes any difference). When the drive calls for cleaning again it will not send an alert but update the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Issues with media server dedupe pools / replication / restores ??

2012-02-23 Thread Kendall, Scott
It's by design. OST will try to use the least busy media server with credentials. Media Host Override is one way to get around the behavior and get it to do what you want. http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH74646 From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Issues with media server dedupe pools /replication / restores ??

2012-02-23 Thread Mark Glazerman
Scott, Thanks so much for your reply. So if I understand correctly, I add the following in the bp.conf on the master server FORCE_RESTORE_MEDIA_SERVER = nbumedia2 where nbumedia2 is the name of the media server I want to use for restores ? I had no idea that this was by design when using

Re: [Veritas-bu] Issues with media server dedupe pools /replication / restores ??

2012-02-23 Thread Jack . Forester
Here's some info explaining the behavior: http://www.symantec.com/connect/forums/how-media-server-load-balancing-affects-restores-openstorage We use the USE_BACKUP_MEDIA_SERVER_FOR_RESTORE option in our environment as we have multiple MSDPs at locations across the country. I don't want a media

Re: [Veritas-bu] Issues with media server dedupe pools /replication / restores ??

2012-02-23 Thread Mark Glazerman
Jack / Scott, We actually just added this entry and (knock on wood) it appears to be doing what we want (and what you guys have said it would !!). I should have reached out to the mailing list sooner because I've had a sev 2 ticket open with Symantec since Monday and they have yet to even

Re: [Veritas-bu] Issues with media server dedupe pools /replication / restores ??

2012-02-23 Thread Jack . Forester
Mark, We ran into this problem a few months ago when I got a call from our offshore support team who was trying to restore a file in Ireland, but it was running reeal slow. Turns out that the media server in Germany was reading the image off the Ireland media server and then sending it back

Re: [Veritas-bu] Issues with media server dedupe pools

2012-02-23 Thread bob944
[ restore uses copy from remote serer ] Thanks so much for your reply. So if I understand correctly, I add the following in the bp.conf on the master server FORCE_RESTORE_MEDIA_SERVER = nbumedia2 where nbumedia2 is the name of the media server I want to use for restores ? I haven't used

Re: [Veritas-bu] Issues with media server dedupe pools

2012-02-23 Thread Jack . Forester
Actually, In the case of the restore I described, it actually did use the local copy to do the restore, it just used a remote media server to do it. It wasn't an issue of which copy to restore from, it was which media server would do the restore. The USE_BACKUP_SERVER_FOR_RESTORE option fit the