is normally quite poor so I know I've got a
NetBackup issue somewhere.
We have pretty much a 24*7 backup window with lots of slow small,
slow big, and some fast, clients.
I think that describes most of us... Do your fast clients drive the LTO
directly at a good speed?
.../Ed
--
Ed
!).
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
in the
currently-available binaries or if your issue is diferent.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
to recommend.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
On 9/11/2006 8:24 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
will flashbackup help speedup my lotus notes database agent backups?
No.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
), but lots of production restores since. We've
got an open case trying to restore from a flashbackup archive, but all
of our other restores have gone the way they should have gone.
I have no idea what the 1K files stuff is all about.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL
absolute no
issues with their support organization nor their efforts to make things
better.
.../Ed
No, I don't speak for the company I work for. This are my personal
thoughts. You really think I have the authority to speak for my employer?
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto
Linux. You
should also consider upgrading your master server to the latest MP.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu
and NBU 4.5, recover your catalog to it,
and then upgrade it to 5.1. Then sit there for a few more months and
finally upgrade that to 6.0 MP4 or MP5. It will be a multi-step
process, but you'll get to a good supportable configuration in the end.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN
at 5.1, we configured 6 tape drives per media server even
though we had 3 servers trying to talk to a total 8 tape drives. Sure
we got a lot of 134s, but they didn't hurt anything.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
this in the future...
You could, I suppose, develop your own scripts to do this but it's a
non-trivial problem to determine if a user can really, really restore a
file from backup (what if it's the same file name but the copy on tape
has different ACLs?).
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View
that we've logged with Symantec - many of them were critical.
Many are closed but critical issues remain. Symantec has confirmed the
bugs - it's a matter of them getting around to fixing them (they've been
working hard, but they're not done yet).
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
for a production environment or just
contain minor patch fixes.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
to
create any more support issues than they have to and they could create more
problems for you than they solve if they give you bad bleeding-edge code.
I've already had to back out of one set of binaries (although they typically
get better and better for us).
.../Ed
Ed Wilts
mailto:[EMAIL
Ed Wilts
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mounds View, MN 55112
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist
waits and
waits as images are destaged, but if they don't destage fast enough, your
backup job to DSSU will fail with a 129.
Working with DSSUs takes some trial and error and a bunch of knowledge about
your backups and their sizes.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mounds View, MN 55112
tapes and be
done.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mounds View, MN 55112
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Jorgensen, Bill wrote:
Sept 15! Focus on nbpem, nbjm, and hot catalog backups.
We've got recent nbpem and nbjm images and it's still broken. They're
working on the issues but they're not quite there yet...
.../Ed
Ed Wilts
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mounds View, MN 55112
.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mounds View, MN 55112
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
).
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
the new files out.
Worth a try on a couple of test servers perhaps?
We do this all the time - we do not have remote shell access. Initially
installing a client requires this but upgrading a client does not.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
common Linux distributions include an NFS server.
I wondered if there was a way to do this in an easy way or anyone provide
some assistance or a link?
The easy way is to install the client, add it to a policy, and start
backing it up.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto
jobs, queued jobs, completed jobs, etc.
The screen shots on Aptare's web site don't currently include the
Command Center dashboard, but it's been there in every release I've run
over the last few years.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
the StorageConsole agent has crashed on the
master and not updated the portal properly (and have received fixes for
those) and my major self-inflicted pain when I upgraded to NBU 6.0 but
didn't reconfigure StorageConsole...it mostly worked but not everywhere
it does now.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts
for a system disk restore
are fully documented in the VMS PDF - make sure you read this if you're
a VMS admin.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http
for day-to-day
operations.
Any real world horror stories or analysis anyone had done would be
appreciated. From what I gather reading the list mostly everyone has
gone LTO / I don't think I've seen SDLT 600 mentioned once!?
SDLT is a dying technology...
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds
your messages file for disk errors. You may have a bad drive
or a bad subsystem (or flakey ISLs on a SAN).
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http
6 does allow you to
create STUs on the fly though.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
, though, test and see what's acceptable in your
environment. We all trade off backup times vs restore times and what's
acceptable for you may not be acceptable for me.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 01:15:56PM -0400, Deiter Scott wrote:
We need to determine if we can run a 5.1 mp4 media server on solaris10.
On Sparc, yes. On Intel, no.
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/263839.htm
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
it's no secret that customers are
requesting this. I guess it just hasn't made it to the top of the
priority list.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http
, Veritas has never
supported a client at a higher version than the master (with the
exception of the VMS client which had the smarts to deal with it).
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist
the first 6.0 release (maintenance paks I believe are targetted
for quarterly releases).
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu
can you hope that the case that's triggering your errors are
the same as mine in which case you'll eventually get a fix, or you can
log a call and make sure. Keep your fingers crossed.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
is still to be avoided for
customers still running a 5.x release.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo
not require a
separate license.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
if ($6 == 13 ) retention = 7 years
if ($6 == 14 ) retention = 10 years
print ,$2 :, type ,every,frequency, days;,retention,retention
}
/^INCLUDE/ {
if ($2 !~ /NEW_STREAM/ ) print ,$2, $3, $4, $5, $6, $7
}
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto
fixed our scheduling issues.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
of
backups before? How did you do your archives - with an rman policy, a
cold database backup, or did you put the database into an archive log
mode?
If you use the command line and do a bplist, do you see any files in
your archives?
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL
)?
Since neither fulls nor incrementals are running right now, when you
create the new policy, just manually run whichever full is due to be on
the safe side. I believe that it will do the right thing though
(if it runs at all) and pick up where it left off.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View
on the peculiarities of the individual systems.
The biggest difference is the stability of the platform. With Windows,
you'll find yourself rebooting whenever you have any tape drive
maintenance - add, replace, etc. With Unix, you can just restart
NetBackup (which can be a pain by itself).
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds
.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
the
changes, but ideally you'd contact Symantec Professional Services to do
the work for you.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http
agreement, go with MP3
If you don't, don't even think about going to 6!
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
or so
times we've across it.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
. In the first step, just make sure you set up a
selection criteria that doesn't match anything you want ejected.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 08:56:48AM -0600, Dustin D'Amour wrote:
How do I roll back to a previous maintenance pack?
Restore from your backups. Hey, this is a backup group - what kind of
response did you expect?
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
paying attention, it's easy to miss. Until you
need a restore.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo
me a 5.1 Media Kit.
Try:
NB_CLT_51_5_M_283093.tar
from:
ftp://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_Enterprise_Server/
All the supported clients should be in the kit (except for VMS which
they insist on selling media for separately).
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View
and you're there.
What speeds have other members gotten when doing speed testing to LTO3
drives?
We've done no tuning yet (the drives just went in) and we're topping out
at around 55-60.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
situation?
We went straight from 5.1 MP5 to 6.0MP2. We never ran 6.0MP1. We're
not at MP3 plus patches (and awaiting more!). MP3 is certainly better
than MP2.
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
issue you have been highlighting for a bit. We use
calendar-based backups on our fulls. I will pay close attention to the
info you relay.
I just received a patch for nbpem and nbjm. They've just been applied
so I'll know more about how well it works over the weekend.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts
unencrypted (or discovering the hard way
that one of your users moved a file to a different client that wasn't
encrypted).
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
labels :-)
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
they can get it out of the ICU quickly.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
resolution in place and everything works nicely.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
5.x, no
you most definitely should not. We've had MAJOR issues since upgrading
to 6.0MP2. The scheduler has caused us a lot of headaches :-(
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist
been working them
with backline engineering support ever since we upgraded a few weeks
ago. Unless you really, really *need* 6.0, stay away for now.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist
will not be restorable. You can back up Exchange live and get
a status 1 - you won't get anything useful on a restore of it either.
Anything higher is what I class a failure.
Anything that's not restorable is a failure, no matter if it's a status
1 or higher.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View
very very stable, rock
solid and well put together.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. When you finally *need* (not *want*) the
features of 6.x, then look at upgrading.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
and then kill it. You'll generate an error 150.
2. Start a job and then suspend it. You'll generate an error 157.
You can also call the script directly and pass in the arguments that it
lists. Nothing says that it has to be NetBackup that calls it.
Cheers,
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View
for the client licenses. There
is no way you can see from the system how many clients you have licenses
for. If you don't have the paperwork, contact your sales rep.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu
you who are
telling them the wrong thing. 1GB, by SI standards, is 1000MB.
Seriously, I was raised and trained in binary too, but the buggers
changed the standards on us in 1998.
one gigabyte 1 GB = 10^9 B = 1 000 000 000 B
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
.../Ed
--
Ed
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 10:54:15PM -0400, bob944 wrote:
When computer logic becomes decimal-based, I'll start using kibibytes.
There are only 10 kinds of people on earth - those who understand binary
and those who don't :-)
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL
under 6 vs. 5? I know there is a
watermark feature.
Also, how come when I bled data off to tape under 5.1MP4, it did not
remove the images from disk? Must I manually purge that data?
Thanks,
Justin.
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
like a beta 2 release than an MP2 release.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
/275912.htm
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:56:45AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
The master server should be upgraded first, then the media servers,
correct?
Correct. Read the installation manual - it's *very* important.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
That defeats the purpose of DHCP but then DHCP for servers doesn't make
much sense anyway.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu
was backed up
and that's an expensive operation. A better method would be to create a
separate policy for just that file and then do a standard
backup_exit_notify script when that policy completes.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:36:04AM -0400, Shyam Hazari wrote:
Anyone seen this error message ? Is a 64bit windows client supported under
a 5.1 NBU ?
The 64-bit client became supported with 5.1MP4.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
jobs now have a priority to
them - that would allow you in the future to set them at a lower
priority than your other jobs. That doesn't help you right now
though...
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas
the information but there are lots of cases where you
simply get the information remotely.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http
that the school is hosting so
much information about Veritas products. But without the search engine
it would takes subscribers like me hours to find what we need by
sifting through those Zip file files. It would be nice if you can put
the search engine back.
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
have any other NetBackup servers, you'll need to purchase
the master server license. If you already have a master server, you'll
need to purchase a media server license.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
1000G 1000G46M 100% /apps/netbackup/dssu
/dev/vx/dsk/osiris_san01/apps2c 2.9T 2.3T 605G80%
/apps/netbackup/dssu2
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
is *NOT* supported for servers with 5.x. You can run 32-bit
Windows on a 64-bit machine but that's not what the original posted
asked. 64-bit NetBackup server binaries on 64-bit Windows requires 6.x.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/30/2006 8:51 PM
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:38:16PM
doing for the same reason...
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
. If you start your next backup and
selected the files created since 12:00, you'd be okay. Now of course
you could select the same file twice (e.g. if the file was created at
12:05 and the directory was processed at 13:00)) but that's a far better
problem than not backing it up at all.
--
Ed
to have a list of
the most common NBU Status Codes and use the PDF for the ones that I do not
see often (if at all)
bperror -S statuscode
Pick whichever are common in your environment and format away...
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
are cheaper than Sparc-based systems.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
(to answer Kate's question - it's
because we wanted 64-bit Windows support without making the major jump
to 6.0) and it went nice and smoothly.
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
market leader here. Since you're in Canada, stick with
Red Hat for support.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
we
replaced our master, the problems went away.
/Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As its network read error, we checked the network settings and found
to be 1000 Gbps auto.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
of a fight, but we bought a new V490
and stayed with Solaris.
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
-client
corpftp.bck.mrll.com -media
Media ID Last Written Server
--
001757 05/11/2006 19:11 stptape2ms.bck.mrll.com
Nice and easy...
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
the client, and it doesnt!
The most common cause of this is an out-of-date client. Update the
client and your 71s will go away.
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http
. After all, it's the big customers
who bought them in the first place.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo
concerns about NetBackup and Linux
support, contact your Symantec reps.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
tell you something about their
Linux commitment too - after all, I'd put SLES in the same category as
RHEL for enterprise-quality (even though I've never worked with SLES).
I've not looked at NetBackup support on SLES at all.
.../Ed
;-)
-sj
Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/10/2006 10
is commited to RHEL 3 - why won't Symantec commit to it?
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http
.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
per appliance are you using?
Thanks,
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
especially be true. It's quite likely that NetBackup has to do a lot
less work to do your restore than to do a backup.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http
this for every media server too. Also look at
the size of the destage - by default they'll only destage 25GB at a time
(and kick off 4 simultaneous streams). Drop the number to 1 like Shane
said, and increase the size to a high number.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL
.
Is there anyone running a NetBackup server on Redhat 4? If so, are
you using 32- or 64-bit?
According to the compatability matrix, it's currently supported.
See http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/263839.htm
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
problem,
I'd take the Solaris server to NBU 6 and then copy everything to Linux,
keeping the same host name. Do not change the host name - make that a
separate project. My guess is that the migration isn't going to be all
that bad...
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL
801 - 900 of 963 matches
Mail list logo
