Hi all,
I have an environment that was set up a while ago and possibly not in the
best configuration: two separate locations about 5 miles apart, each with
one Master server.
Bandwidth between the sites is a T1, so I am not sure if it is feasible but
we will be upgrading soon from 5.1 to 6.5 I
Hi all,
I got my previous NOM issue taken care of (not seeing the Builtin domain)
but now have another hurdle:
NOM is installed in two seperate environments and are both having the same
issue: emails are not being sent out when configured in an alert policy.
The odd thing is, reports can be
Hi all,
Trying to install Network Operations Manager on a lab box here, I went
through all the steps that were outlined in my class and I am up against a
hitch:
When I go to log in at http://host:8181/nom , the instructions say to change
the domain to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED](vx)
Except, no such
Has anyone seen this before? I am trying to install the 6.5 Admin Console
to my laptop, and every time it gets to the end and I see this message:
The Veritas Netbackup install was interrupted before it could be completed
I searched the Symantec support site but all the references I see to this
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Barber, Layne Mr CTR US DISA GS4M2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that a lot of the 6.0 setting are now stored in the emm database.
Does anyone have a listing of all available setting for NBU 6.0?
Thank You,
Not sure if this is what you mean, but give it
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Michitsch, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The 65 admin console doesn't work on Vista. I had the same issue. Per
Symantec, it will not work on Vista and there are no plans for it in the
next dot release.
That's good to know, at least I can stop banging my
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Bill Tsukahara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tony,
Unless I'm not understand what you mean by 65 admin console, I upgraded
to 6.5 a week ago and I am running the Admin Console on Vista.
Bill
Hmmm, guess we have two different answers then? Earlier:
The 65
- Brick level backups of Exchange...not nearly as good as Backup Exec
*runs out of the room*
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Curtis Preston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey there, folks! I'm working very hard on my next book, which will
have some product-specific information in it. I'm
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:42 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony
Quick Q - when you realised the problems, were you able to plan to REVERT
the systems back ?
Simon
Revert back to 5.1? I realize now that there should have been a plan to do
that; Symantec
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:33 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*not sure I would agree - it seems that going from 5.1 to 6.5 or even
6.5.1 should be the easier upgrade path.*
*maybe careful planning is the key? *
Honestly, I don't know how much more we could have
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:46 PM, rascal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, so we found an interesting issue now with our upgrades. Right now our
master/media server is experiencing issues with hot catalog backups (to
tape). Here are some interesting, fun facts:
1. our master server is an aix
Hi all,
I am interested in hearing about any of the upgrades that you have done,
mainly going from 5.x to 6.5
There seem to be quite a few environments (in my area) that are looking to
upgrade, and I am putting together some documentation
that asks questions to better prepare for it. I am still
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Scott Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in the process of a 5.1 to 6.5.1 upgrade in my stagging environment
(Windows Master, 4 Linux Media Servers) as of yesterday and today. When
finished, I'll be heading east to upgrade the operations there. Upon
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Elena Khan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took Veritas NetBackup 6.5 for Solaris Administration in November.
Facility is in New York City on Madison Avenue (midtown)
I was very pleased with the training, esp. the instructor who was open to
lots of technical
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Sean Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It made for support to look at it and you really have to let them check it
out.
We went through the process and it took multiple passes and fixes of
problems in our catalog before we are ok to do the upgrade and the
I have an upgrade project coming up, going from 5.1 to 6.5 I have been
doing some research and it was suggested that I run the utility NBCC
(consistency checker).
Downloaded and ran it on a test box, and I don't really get what it is
supposed to tell me. Not only that, the last line in the
It's NTFS and you're creating and deleting a lot of files on the volume so
of course it will fragment. Either defragment the volume or set the minimum
threshold lower so that more files get deleted when the cleanup process runs
to reduce the fragmentation.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds
On Feb 20, 2008 11:10 AM, Martin, Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found through testing when we first added some 16TB of storage for
Disk-2-Disk that your fragmentation is going to be directly related to how
many simultaneous streams you write to a DSU/DSSU at a time. In my testing,
Has anyone heard of this issue? I have an environment where NBU 5.1 (plans
to get to 6.5.1 are in the works) is backing up to disk then staging to
tape.
The admins tell me that the area where the backups are going gets very
fragmented after each backup. It is a Windows box, using NTFS.
19 matches
Mail list logo
