are failing.
Now this is something new to troubleshoot.
PranavB
To: pranav_vent...@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610
From: ken_zuf...@goodyear.com
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:35:26 -0400
How often are you running the backups?
If TIR information has dropped off
Hello Geeks,
I am here facing issues with synthetic backup. There are 7-8 windows 2008
clients that are giving me issues with synthetic backup.The backup is failing
with 610.
1: (610) end point terminated with an error
Environment : Master windows 2008 R2 -7.5.0.5Client 7.5.0.5 -2008R2
We are
support.
Ken Zufall
Operating Systems Administrator
The Goodyear Tire Rubber Company
From: pranav batra pranav_vent...@hotmail.com
To: Veritas veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date: 06/04/2013 02:53 AM
Subject:[Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610
Sent
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
ken_zuf...@goodyear.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:33 PM
To: pranav_vent...@hotmail.com
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610
We had a similar
...@hotmail.com
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date: 06/04/2013 10:15 AM
Subject:RE: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610
But ,
I think that you can run differential incrementals and synthesize a
cumulative backup.
Then you can use the full and the latest synthetic
We are only trying to synthesize full and differential. We are not taking
cumulative and still backup is failing with 610.
Thanks,PranavB
To: sm...@peppas.gr
CC: pranav_vent...@hotmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610
From
We have two big fileshares (900GB, 1.5TB, both about 2 million files) that I
recently changed to Synthetic Full backups to speed up backups. [We're on
NetBackup Enterprise 6.5, backing up to disk and then duplicating to tapes].
But every few weeks these SynthFulls just don't start!
A
terry712 wrote:
running synthetic backups . windows backups and all 6.5.6. the backups are
synthesiing without problem - only thing that i still need to get setup is i
want a monthly backup to get ported onto tape.
how do you do this?
Gidday, what we do for our EOM backups is do a
Find out and let me know :P
There is a touchfile to allow the synth to write 2 copies at the same
time. One to disk, one to tape. I wish the NBU developers would get off
their asses and enable SLP as a backup target for synthetics. This
omission is pathetic to have been left as a known issue
Anybody pulling, or have pulled, their hair out on this one?
Synthetic Backup Fails Code 671
*error=the database contains conflicting or erroneous entries(238)*
I found the following, but even though it seemed to match my issue, it was
of no use.
: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Crowey
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 10:52 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups
cpreston wrote:
And you're verifying that the original full does not need
There is a case open with Symantec about this issue, and I am told an EEB will
be made available soon.
You are not supposed to have to keep a full around, but once the full expires a
new full is taken automagically.
QuoteSo it appears I need to keep the Full backup around even though the
@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups
There is a case open with Symantec about this issue, and I am told an EEB
will be made available soon.
You are not supposed to have to keep a full around, but once the full
expires a new full is taken automagically.
QuoteSo it appears I need
There is a case open with Symantec about this issue, and I am told
an EEB will be made available soon.
You are not supposed to have to keep a full around,
No. You _must_ have a full plus subsequent TIR and diffs or cincs
to synthesize a new full, but it does not matter how the full was
...@federaledge.com; jhilt...@excite.com
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups
There is a case open with Symantec about this issue, and I am told an
EEB will be made available soon.
You are not supposed to have to keep a full around,
No. You _must_ have a full plus subsequent TIR and diffs
Jim,
I've been testing it myself. I think you do need to keep that full backup
around. The synthetic part of a synthetic backup is the consolidation of the
full backup and the incrementals into a single image. This is done via
duplication.
The test scenario I'm working with is the
I've been testing it myself. I think you do need to keep that full backup
around. The synthetic part of a synthetic backup is the consolidation of
the full backup and the incrementals into a single image. This is done via
duplication.
What makes it synthetic is that it is created tape
] On Behalf Of cpreston
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:39 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups
I've been testing it myself. I think you do need to keep that full
backup around. The synthetic part of a synthetic backup is the
consolidation of the full
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups
I've been testing it myself. I think you do need to keep that full
backup around. The synthetic part of a synthetic backup is the
consolidation of the full backup and the incrementals into a single
image. This is done
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:11:46AM +1000, Dean wrote:
From what I've read, and from what Curtis says below, you DON'T need to keep
the original full backup around, once you've created at least one more
synethtic full backup. You can do just one full backup, then keep creating
synthetic fulls
I see what you mean. But I suspect that's just a poorly worded paragraph.
The diagram on page 200 of the Admin Guide (Vol 1, Windows version)
indicates the original full is not required ongoing.
I wish I could say for sure from experience, but I've never been able to get
synthetic backups
Gidday, I've been running synthetics for nearly two years now to backup about
3/3.5 TBs and have to say has generally run extremely well.
Within the same policy I have 3 schedules.
The first is an ad-hoc full - I used this to create the first full backup, and
on the very few occasions when
To: Jim Horalek
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups
From what I've read, and from what Curtis says below, you DON'T need to keep
the original full backup around, once you've created at least one more
synethtic full backup. You can do just one full
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups
Gidday, I've been running synthetics for nearly two years now to backup
about 3/3.5 TBs and have to say has generally run extremely well.
Within the same policy I have 3 schedules.
The first is an ad-hoc full - I used this to create the first full backup
cpreston wrote:
And you're verifying that the original full does not need to be kept around?
OK ... I missed two important points I guess. With a 1 month retention period,
I always have 4 (weekly) synthetic backups in my library, and so yes I've never
had any problem about recovering
I have a bit of an oddity.
I'm testing Synthetic Backups.
I have
Day 1 Full backup.
Day 2 Incremental
Day 3 Synthetic-Full
Day 4 Incremental (and manually expire the Day 1 Full)
Day 5 Full backup runs
So it appears I need to keep the Full backup around even though the
Synthetic Full
When performing a synthetic full, what should I use, a differential
Incremental or a cumulative incremental?...and why?
Thanks
Dan Cruice
Deloitte Technology Service
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Direct: +1 610-479-5179
Fax: +1 610-479-6179
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 3:48 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic fulls Diff Inc VS cumulative Inc
When performing a synthetic full, what should I use, a differential
Incremental or a cumulative incremental?...and why?
Thanks
Dan Cruice
Deloitte Technology
: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic fulls Diff Inc VS cumulative Inc
What is your goal for Synthetic fulls? Are you running the incrementals to
tape or disk? Are you running the fulls to tape or disk?
Reneé Carlisle
ServerWare Corporation
From: [EMAIL
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cruice, Daniel
(US - Glen Mills)
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 4:23 PM
To: rcarlisle; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic fulls Diff Inc VS cumulative Inc
Right now we are running
I am curious if anyone is using the Synthetic Full Backup feature that
is provided with Netbackup now. If people are using it, what issues if
any have you come across with this feature and what specific workload
have you applied this feature to? Also, what benefits have you seen ?
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne T
Smith
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 1:25 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Full Backups
This was some time ago, but I found synthetic backups to be either
NBU 5.1 - MP5
HP-UX
I want to use
synthetic backups for a large client. The question is, Can I have the Normal
full go to tape and then have the diff inc go to a dsu and have the synth full
go to tape? If so, how would I set up a policy for this?
Thank You,
Layne Barber
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barber,
Layne (Contractor)Sent: October 16, 2006 10:52 AMTo:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic
Backup
NBU 5.1 - MP5
HP-UX
I want to use
synthetic backups for a large client. The question is, Can I have
34 matches
Mail list logo
