0n Fri, May 12, 2006 at 06:05:11PM +0100, WEAVER, Simon wrote:
Bob
although sounds ok, the only drawback I see is:
1) People will forget to post a resolution
I agree. Sunmanagers and Tru64managers are run like this. _many_ people do not
end up posting their
The overwhelming response was to keep the present structure.
However, there were also concerns to keep the chatter down by:
1) encouraging sending thank you to individuals as opposed to the entire group.
2) eliminate "I don't know" replies to the group address
3) reduce the number of replies to
3) originator collects replies and posts resolution or
further enquirers
Laudable goal; not gonna happen. Hardly anyone who didn't learn in
ARPANet or Usenet days has ever _seen_
reply-to-me-I'll-post-a-summary-to-the-list, or other responsible
behaviors in a mailing list: trimming replies,
I understand your point Bob, but tend to agree with most of the other comments. Turning this into more like the sunmanagers list would completely change the dynamic. I think it's valuable to be able to see all responses as people work through a problem together. This is a fantastic mailing list
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: Doug Hughes
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?
The knowledge and experience level in this group is valuable.
Unfortunately it is also very busy with a single thread growing into
multiple replies to all.
Can the volume be cut down by following this simple etiquette?
1) originator
The knowledge and experience level in this group is valuable.
Unfortunately it is also very busy with a single thread growing into multiple replies to all.
Can the volume be cut down by following this simple etiquette?
1) originatorposts question
2) participants reply directly to the
] On Behalf Of Bob Stump
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 12:11
PM
To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: Doug Hughes
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Can this be
done?
The knowledge and
experience level in this group is valuable.
Unfortunately it
is also very busy with a single thread growing
:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduCc: Doug
HughesSubject: [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?
The knowledge and experience level in this group is valuable.
Unfortunately it is also very busy with a single thread growing into
multiple replies to all.
Can the volume be cut down by following
: [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?
The knowledge and experience level in this group is valuable.
Unfortunately it is also very busy with a single thread growing into
multiple replies to all.
Can the volume be cut down by following this simple etiquette?
1) originatorposts question
2) particip
* Jeff Lightner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-12 12:55]:
That's not the culture of this list although it is on others I am
subscribed to. The downside I've seen to what you propose is that many
times people do not post the summary so one finds more questions than
solutions in the archives.
You
tell I'm a little laid back today? 8)
-Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Stump
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 12:11 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: Doug Hughes
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Can this be done
I very much prefer the present operation over Bob's proposal. Some
thoughts ...
1. Many problems iterate to a solution and the iteration steps are
valuable for their information and for gaining an understanding of
experience or level of trust with each responder.
2. Many problems
there was... thoughts?
Regards,
Tristan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne T
Smith
Sent: Saturday, 13 May 2006 5:31 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?
I very much prefer the present
13 matches
Mail list logo
