Jack - I work for Symantec and can tell you that we've got a very aggressive
country expansion that will occur over the next 12 months. If you're
interested reach out to me directly and I'll make sure you get a roadmap update
on country expansion.
Howard Graylin - Sorry to hear you're having
...@mylan.com
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 3:25 PM
To: Jerry Hoetger
Cc: Howard Graylin; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Puredisk
I have one PureDisk server at 6.6.3a + some-fix-I-can't-remember. Seems
pretty solid here. Of course
Anyone out there using Puredisk? Do you like it? We're using it currently,
but having all kinds of issues with it. We're getting help from backline
engineers, Business Critical Engineers, and some high level TSE's, but it's
still a giant pain in my opinion. Just curious if others have had
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Howard Graylin
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 12:30 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Puredisk
Anyone out there using Puredisk? Do you like it? We're using it currently,
but having all
I have one PureDisk server at 6.6.3a + some-fix-I-can't-remember. Seems
pretty solid here. Of course the only reason we set up a server rather
than buy one of the 50x0 appliances was that at the time, they weren't
available in the country where we wanted to deploy it. It's a target for
opt-dup
Hi list,
I am getting the following error when starting the Puredisk V 6.6 service on
SuSE Enterprise Linux 2.6.16.60-0.42.4:
In Authenticator Unable to load libName=/opt/VRTSat/lib/libAtWrapper.so
com.symantec.nbu.paf.exception.PAFCommunicationException: ; nested exception is:
, February 15, 2011 5:40 PM
To: Ed Wilts; Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
I don't buy that rational. How often do you think you are going to turn over
an appliance? It is more likely you will add to the pool of appliances. I
know we
-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Sesar,
Steven L.
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:13 PM
To: Marelas, Peter; Ed Wilts; Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
Most firms
PureDisk is def cheaper up front. However, dedupe rates and ingest performance
are no where near what a DD box can do.
Factor in also, if you did you Older, servers, what is the 3,4, and 5 yr
maintenance costs on that, for those servers? Not to mention the storage.
IMO, while a higher up
When I looked at these options a couple of years ago a key difference that
mattered to us was that the PureDisk appliance was not 'owned' by any NetBackup
domain. That meant several domains can use the same appliance, and so e.g. to
replicate both ways between 2 DCs a pair of appliances was
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Fred M 77fre...@gmail.com wrote:
My employer is requesting I evaluate PureDisk and DataDomain for
de-duplication.
One of the selling advantages of the PureDisk appliances is that you only
buy the de-dupe licenses once. All hardware eventually gets old. When
.
-Jonathan
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 11:46 AM
To: Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 3:46 AM
To: Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Fred M
77fre...@gmail.commailto:77fre...@gmail.com wrote:
My
To: Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
We use both here and have been for over 4 years. We use Data Domain
for all of our data center backups and Puredisk (the original appliance based
version) for all
: +1.304.554.6039
Cell: +1.412.805.5313
From: Pat McDonald pat_mcdon...@symantec.com
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: Pat McDonald pat_mcdon...@symantec.com
Date: 02/14/2011 10:52 AM
Subject:Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
Sent by:veritas-bu-boun
-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Fred M
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 10:14 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
Hi all,
My employer is requesting I evaluate PureDisk
Hi all,
My employer is requesting I evaluate PureDisk and DataDomain for
de-duplication. While I can setup a demo of each and get the numbers, and
ask the sales guys what makes them great and why their competitors aren't, I
can't trust that is nothing more than sales drivel. So, I ask you expert
To all,
We are on the verge of implementing puredisk dedup into our NBU environment.
I have read up on this feature, but I would prefer to get real life comments on
this solution, so with that being said:
What has been your experience with PureDisk dedupe? Does it work? What are some
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
ccosta@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 9:29 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk Dedup
To all,
We are on the verge of implementing puredisk dedup into our NBU environment.
I have read up on this feature, but I would
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
ccosta@gmail.com
Sent: July 7, 2010 9:29 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk Dedup
To all,
We are on the verge
Hi to all,
Has anyone installed a puredisk client on a cluster system?
I cannot find any information.
My thoughts are:
How to install the client at the cluster nodes and how to backup the cluster
resources.
Any info I can get will be useful.
Thanks
Stefanos
I was wondering if anyone is using Pure Disk and in what capacity. We have some
systems that have millions of small files, and
Thought that maybe backing these servers up using Pure Disk what help solve
some of our time window issues.
Thanks
Don Klebba
Quicken Loans
Storage Management Team
/20/09, Klebba, Don donkle...@quickenloans.com wrote:
From: Klebba, Don donkle...@quickenloans.com
Subject: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk Customers
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date: Friday, November 20, 2009, 7:47 AM
I
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Burrell
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 5:17 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk Customers
We're using it to backup about 35 remote servers, some of which have the
millions of small files issue in spades.
Short
Hi,
Quick query , is anyone using puredisk dedeuplication for RMAN and how
are they finding it? Looking at options to cut down the backup window of
a large database system we're in the middle of setting up - Oracle
Solaris, probably Netbackup
TIA
Gary
Please help Logica to respect the
PureDisk is licensed per host and per front end TB.
If you are a Netbackup customer already, your standard clients in NBU, are the
same for PureDisk. No extra cost! If you have to buy more licenses for
PureDisk, you can interchangeably use them in NBU. Of course not everything is
a good
.
--
*From:* veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of *Ed Wilts
*Sent:* Friday, 24 April 2009 2:26 AM
*To:* Michael Graff Andersen
*Cc:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Puredisk experiences
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Tristan Ball
tristan.b...@leica-microsystems.com wrote:
I’d second both of these points, but especially the pricing one. When we
looked at it, pricing was based on the volume of data pre-deduplication, and
bought in blocks of n Gigabytes or Terabytes.
1)
I work with Ed so I have to be careful here or he'll start throwing sharp
objects over the wall at me- but I don't agree straight-up with everything he's
said.
The Puredisk pricing model does make sense in some environments: our initial
purchase of 2 TB covered 15 offices- that's pretty good
me know if you
have any specific questions about it.
Monte
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Graff
Andersen
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 12:58 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Michael Graff Andersen mia...@gmail.comwrote:
We are considering Puredisk for our remote offices and would like to hear
other users experiences with it
PureDisk is great for backups but you have to have a serious look at your
restore requirements. For
0n Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:26:20AM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
That said, we really like PureDisk technically. We still don't like the
price...
Well this is the confusing part. I thought as of NBU 6.5 PureDisk was dundled
in for free ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Puredisk experiences ?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Michael Graff Andersen
mia...@gmail.com wrote:
We are considering Puredisk for our remote offices and would like to
hear other users experiences with it
PureDisk
Hi
We are considering Puredisk for our remote offices and would like to hear
other users experiences with it
Regards
Michael
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
We use Puredisk to back up file servers at our remote sites. We then replicate
that backed up data to a duplicate puredisk server at our DR site.
The backups to the Puredisk server in our data center work great but some of
the replication jobs sending the data to the DR site fail on occasion
35 matches
Mail list logo
