[Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Win2k3
Title: Message Guys Wonder if you can help - trying to perform a restore from a month end backup from 6th Nov 05. Trouble is, in December, the Tape Library that was in use blew up and has now been replaced by a fancy new HP EVL Library using LTO3. The previos Library was LTO2 Using the BA and Restore tool, Netbackup sees the images and knows about the tapes. I loaded the tapes into the library, verified they are there and kicked off the restore. The following is logged in activity monitor.. 08/02/2006 09:00:56 - begin Restore08/02/2006 09:00:56 - 1 images required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1278L1 required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1104L1 required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1286L1 required08/02/2006 09:01:29 - restoring image 194.11.11.201_113124581508/02/2006 09:01:31 - started process bptm (3480)08/02/2006 09:01:31 - mounting 1286L108/02/2006 09:01:31 - connecting08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=3480) error requesting media, TpErrno = Requested number of drives are not configured08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) The following files/folders were not restored:08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Shortcut to tesat.fs.lnk08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/tesat.fs08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/anik_fge.jpg08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/anik_fgek.jpg08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/CI Codes Anik.doc08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Contents.PDF08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Equipment Data.xls08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Re-use equipments.xls08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) more than 10 files were not restored, remaining ones are shown in the progress log.08/02/2006 09:01:32 - restored image 194.11.11.201_1131245815 - (error requesting media (tpreq)(98)); restore time 00:00:0308/02/2006 09:01:32 - Warning bprd(pid=3932) Restore must be resumed prior to first image expiration on 12/08/2006 03:56:5508/02/2006 09:01:32 - end Restore; elapsed time: 00:00:36the restore failed to recover the requested files(5) Now, the robot doesnt even make an effort to load the tapes!! So I know its not reading them, but do not understand why. I wonder if anyone can shed any light on this? Apprecaite any help! Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Win2k3
Title: Message You are going to have to change the drive type of one of the LTO3 tapes to LTO2. It is Backward compatible to read the tape, however, NB won't load the tape into a drive that is not of the same type. The image has the tape type. Make sure that NB sees the tape media as the correct type. By looking at your tape names, you may even have LTO1 media. You can do a bpimagelist -L -backupid "your backup job id" and it will show you what media type the image says it is on. Bobby Williams 2205 Peterson Drive Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 423-296-8200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, SimonSent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:36 AMTo: 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'Subject: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Win2k3 Guys Wonder if you can help - trying to perform a restore from a month end backup from 6th Nov 05. Trouble is, in December, the Tape Library that was in use blew up and has now been replaced by a fancy new HP EVL Library using LTO3. The previos Library was LTO2 Using the BA and Restore tool, Netbackup sees the images and knows about the tapes. I loaded the tapes into the library, verified they are there and kicked off the restore. The following is logged in activity monitor.. 08/02/2006 09:00:56 - begin Restore08/02/2006 09:00:56 - 1 images required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1278L1 required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1104L1 required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1286L1 required08/02/2006 09:01:29 - restoring image 194.11.11.201_113124581508/02/2006 09:01:31 - started process bptm (3480)08/02/2006 09:01:31 - mounting 1286L108/02/2006 09:01:31 - connecting08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=3480) error requesting media, TpErrno = Requested number of drives are not configured08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) The following files/folders were not restored:08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Shortcut to tesat.fs.lnk08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/tesat.fs08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/anik_fge.jpg08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/anik_fgek.jpg08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/CI Codes Anik.doc08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Contents.PDF08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Equipment Data.xls08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Re-use equipments.xls08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) more than 10 files were not restored, remaining ones are shown in the progress log.08/02/2006 09:01:32 - restored image 194.11.11.201_1131245815 - (error requesting media (tpreq)(98)); restore time 00:00:0308/02/2006 09:01:32 - Warning bprd(pid=3932) Restore must be resumed prior to first image expiration on 12/08/2006 03:56:5508/02/2006 09:01:32 - end Restore; elapsed time: 00:00:36the restore failed to recover the requested files(5) Now, the robot doesnt even make an effort to load the tapes!! So I know its not reading them, but do not understand why. I wonder if anyone can shed any light on this? Apprecaite any help! Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Wi n2k3
Title: Message Bobby Ok this is not going to be as easy as I thought! The Master is sharing 4 tape drives (all LTO3) to 2 Media Servers as well. At least I now know why NBU wont load any tapes into the drives! Any ideas on how I change the tape drive? I thought the whole idea of backwards compatible was that in situations like this, the LTO2 tape would be read by the LTO3 drive?? Any help is really appreciated! Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Bobby Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2006 10:39To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Win2k3 You are going to have to change the drive type of one of the LTO3 tapes to LTO2. It is Backward compatible to read the tape, however, NB won't load the tape into a drive that is not of the same type. The image has the tape type. Make sure that NB sees the tape media as the correct type. By looking at your tape names, you may even have LTO1 media. You can do a bpimagelist -L -backupid "your backup job id" and it will show you what media type the image says it is on. Bobby Williams 2205 Peterson Drive Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 423-296-8200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, SimonSent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:36 AMTo: 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'Subject: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Win2k3 Guys Wonder if you can help - trying to perform a restore from a month end backup from 6th Nov 05. Trouble is, in December, the Tape Library that was in use blew up and has now been replaced by a fancy new HP EVL Library using LTO3. The previos Library was LTO2 Using the BA and Restore tool, Netbackup sees the images and knows about the tapes. I loaded the tapes into the library, verified they are there and kicked off the restore. The following is logged in activity monitor.. 08/02/2006 09:00:56 - begin Restore08/02/2006 09:00:56 - 1 images required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1278L1 required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1104L1 required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1286L1 required08/02/2006 09:01:29 - restoring image 194.11.11.201_113124581508/02/2006 09:01:31 - started process bptm (3480)08/02/2006 09:01:31 - mounting 1286L108/02/2006 09:01:31 - connecting08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=3480) error requesting media, TpErrno = Requested number of drives are not configured08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) The following files/folders were not restored:08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Shortcut to tesat.fs.lnk08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/tesat.fs08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/anik_fge.jpg08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/anik_fgek.jpg08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/CI Codes Anik.doc08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Contents.PDF08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Equipment Data.xls08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Re-use equipments.xls08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) more than 10 files were not restored, remaining ones are shown in the progress log.08/02/2006 09:01:32 - restored image 194.11.11.201_1131245815 - (error requesting media (tpreq)(98)); restore time 00:00:0308/02/2006 09:01:32 - Warning bprd(pid=3932) Restore must be resumed prior to first image expiration on 12/08/2006 03:56:5508/02/2006 09:01:32 - end Restore; elapsed time: 00:00:36the restore failed to recover the requested files(5) Now, the robot doesnt even make an effort to load the tapes!! So I know its not reading them, but do not understand why. I wonder if anyone can shed any light on this? Apprecaite any help! Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any
RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Wi n2k3
Title: Message Bob To add to my earlier response, I went to the Reports Tool and done an IMAGES ON MEDIA REPORT for the Tape ID's needed. @The density shows HCART Could not perform Media Contents - again probably due to the drives being different! Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Bobby Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2006 10:39To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Win2k3 You are going to have to change the drive type of one of the LTO3 tapes to LTO2. It is Backward compatible to read the tape, however, NB won't load the tape into a drive that is not of the same type. The image has the tape type. Make sure that NB sees the tape media as the correct type. By looking at your tape names, you may even have LTO1 media. You can do a bpimagelist -L -backupid "your backup job id" and it will show you what media type the image says it is on. Bobby Williams 2205 Peterson Drive Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 423-296-8200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, SimonSent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:36 AMTo: 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'Subject: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Win2k3 Guys Wonder if you can help - trying to perform a restore from a month end backup from 6th Nov 05. Trouble is, in December, the Tape Library that was in use blew up and has now been replaced by a fancy new HP EVL Library using LTO3. The previos Library was LTO2 Using the BA and Restore tool, Netbackup sees the images and knows about the tapes. I loaded the tapes into the library, verified they are there and kicked off the restore. The following is logged in activity monitor.. 08/02/2006 09:00:56 - begin Restore08/02/2006 09:00:56 - 1 images required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1278L1 required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1104L1 required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1286L1 required08/02/2006 09:01:29 - restoring image 194.11.11.201_113124581508/02/2006 09:01:31 - started process bptm (3480)08/02/2006 09:01:31 - mounting 1286L108/02/2006 09:01:31 - connecting08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=3480) error requesting media, TpErrno = Requested number of drives are not configured08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) The following files/folders were not restored:08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Shortcut to tesat.fs.lnk08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/tesat.fs08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/anik_fge.jpg08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/anik_fgek.jpg08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/CI Codes Anik.doc08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Contents.PDF08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Equipment Data.xls08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Re-use equipments.xls08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) more than 10 files were not restored, remaining ones are shown in the progress log.08/02/2006 09:01:32 - restored image 194.11.11.201_1131245815 - (error requesting media (tpreq)(98)); restore time 00:00:0308/02/2006 09:01:32 - Warning bprd(pid=3932) Restore must be resumed prior to first image expiration on 12/08/2006 03:56:5508/02/2006 09:01:32 - end Restore; elapsed time: 00:00:36the restore failed to recover the requested files(5) Now, the robot doesnt even make an effort to load the tapes!! So I know its not reading them, but do not understand why. I wonder if anyone can shed any light on this? Apprecaite any help! Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage,
FW: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master W in2k3
Title: Message Guys An update - I think I may have worked it out - going to device manager, changed the drive type to hcart for all master and media servers. just going to kick a restore off now!! I can always put it back the way it was if this screws things up :( Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: WEAVER, Simon Sent: 08 February 2006 10:48To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Win2k3 Bob To add to my earlier response, I went to the Reports Tool and done an IMAGES ON MEDIA REPORT for the Tape ID's needed. @The density shows HCART Could not perform Media Contents - again probably due to the drives being different! Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Bobby Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2006 10:39To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Win2k3 You are going to have to change the drive type of one of the LTO3 tapes to LTO2. It is Backward compatible to read the tape, however, NB won't load the tape into a drive that is not of the same type. The image has the tape type. Make sure that NB sees the tape media as the correct type. By looking at your tape names, you may even have LTO1 media. You can do a bpimagelist -L -backupid "your backup job id" and it will show you what media type the image says it is on. Bobby Williams 2205 Peterson Drive Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 423-296-8200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, SimonSent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:36 AMTo: 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'Subject: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Win2k3 Guys Wonder if you can help - trying to perform a restore from a month end backup from 6th Nov 05. Trouble is, in December, the Tape Library that was in use blew up and has now been replaced by a fancy new HP EVL Library using LTO3. The previos Library was LTO2 Using the BA and Restore tool, Netbackup sees the images and knows about the tapes. I loaded the tapes into the library, verified they are there and kicked off the restore. The following is logged in activity monitor.. 08/02/2006 09:00:56 - begin Restore08/02/2006 09:00:56 - 1 images required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1278L1 required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1104L1 required08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1286L1 required08/02/2006 09:01:29 - restoring image 194.11.11.201_113124581508/02/2006 09:01:31 - started process bptm (3480)08/02/2006 09:01:31 - mounting 1286L108/02/2006 09:01:31 - connecting08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=3480) error requesting media, TpErrno = Requested number of drives are not configured08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) The following files/folders were not restored:08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Shortcut to tesat.fs.lnk08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/tesat.fs08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/anik_fge.jpg08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/anik_fgek.jpg08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/CI Codes Anik.doc08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Contents.PDF08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Equipment Data.xls08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Anik F1R/Re-use equipments.xls08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) more than 10 files were not restored, remaining ones are shown in the progress log.08/02/2006 09:01:32 - restored image 194.11.11.201_1131245815 - (error requesting media (tpreq)(98)); restore time 00:00:0308/02/2006 09:01:32 - Warning bprd(pid=3932) Restore must be resumed prior to first image expiration on 12/08/2006 03:56:5508/02/2006 09:01:32 - end Restore; elapsed time: 00:00:36the restore failed to recover the requested files(5) Now, the robot doesnt even make an effort to load the tapes!! So I know its not reading them, but do not understand why. I wonder if anyone can shed any light on this? Apprecaite any help! Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL
Re: [Veritas-bu] performance?
Have you set NET_BUFFER_SZ at all on the clients? It may try and increase the throughput buffer wise from client end where it was using standard values before. Dave Paul Keating wrote: I can add more GigE cards.matter of fact the box already has a dual GigE NIC installed. But I don't want to add bigger doors in front of a small hallway. Ie...can the PCI bus/bridge support 2 more GigE NICs. Networks is monitoring my switch ports and showing me peaks less than 200Mb/s on each of my Gig cards.avg even less. I'm getting a sniffer ready to monitor my NICs for a few minutes during some peak periods..should be able to tell me if the server is congested and pushing back, or if the clients just aren't sending it fast enough. Looking at deploying some media servers this year anyway, so Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Austin Murphy Sent: February 7, 2006 2:58 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] performance? It looks like you are maxing out your Gigabit ethernet cards. My performance measurements of Gigabit ethernet were at best ~35MB/sec for one normal gigabit link. The only numbers I saw on the internet that were substantially higher used jumbo frames. I'm using an E450 (4x 296MHz) with a 4-port GigaSwift (2 ports live, 2 offline). I restricted the storage unit to only use 2 drives (LTO-2) at once, each of which maxes out at ~30MB/sec native. If you added a 4x GigaSwift card (or two) and arranged your network to make use of the extra Gigabit links, you could pump more data to your tapes. If you can spend a bit more money you might try a faster technology like 10GbE or IP over Fibrechannel. Beyond that I think you are looking at a media server. Austin Murphy On 2/7/06, Paul Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running a Sunfire V880. 4x 1.2 GHz Ultrasparc III+ proc. 8 Gig Ram 6 internal 72 Gig disks. 1st pair disks mirrored OS /, /usr, /opt, etc etc 2nd pair disks mirrored /opt/openv (replicated to a standby system using Veritas Volume Replicator) 3rd pair disks one slice mirrored for VVR's SRL logs remainder of the two disks concatenated into a 96 Gig FS for a DSSU for a couple of small clients on 10Mb/s HD encrypted links. Pair of FC200 HBAs in 66MHz PCI slots Pair of GigaSwift GigE cards in 33MHz PCI slots (only 2 66Mhz slots on the machine.) the HBAs each feed 7 tape drives and 1 robot.using Inline tape copy.the robots are essentially mirroredone onsite, one at the end of a DWDM link. I previously had only 3 drives at each site.and added the additional 4 at each site two weeks ago. with the 3 drives per site, I was getting approx 60MB/s total date to the three drives...so an avg of 20MB/s drive. The addidional drives were added for resiliency (Mgmt wanted two stus, one for dev, one for prod servers..so now we have a stu with 4 drives avail for prod, and 3 drives avail for dev) in the case where a client or two stuck at half duplex hangs up a drive all night, the remainder of jobs can finish... The problem is that, after adding the new tape drives, we don't get any more total throughputseemd stuck at about 60-65MB/s, but now spread among twice the tape drives. This means that since more machines are backing up concurrantly (allowed because of the increased number of drives) that each machine is backing up slower...in effect, each machine is taking twice as long to back upcausing some major issues. Anyone know of any particular configs or issues that may be affecting us here? benchmarks on processing required to manage this many ITC jobs? we didn't see a performance hit in the lab, but never had this big of a system in the lab to really load it. I've been doing consant IOstat and netstat monitoringno waits/queues/errors/collisions anywhere, except at one point for about 15 minutes during the FULL window on the weekend, a few waits accumulated on the disks the /opt/openv resides onbut the performance was the same during that period as the remaining 24+ hours, where there were no waits. any new ideas would be welcome. Thanks, Paul == == La version française suit le texte anglais. -- -- This email message from the Bank of Canada is given in good faith, and shall not be binding or construed as constituting any obligation on the part of the Bank. This email may contain privileged and/or
RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 MasterWi n2k3
Hi William Well I believe I got it sorted, simply by using the GUI and changing the format of the drive from HCART3 to HCART. Attempted a restore, tape loaded, data recovered and its all there :-) I did not need to change the volume name, because this was a month end, with a retention of 12 months. The tape was also known by NBU, because the tapes went into the correct volume pool. In the next few months, we will have exhausted our needs to use LTO1 tapes, and my understanding is, as long as NBU knows about the tapes and they have not expired, there should be no need to change or add rules for barcodes? Tell me if I am wrong. But the restore does appear to have worked fine. I am going to eject the tapes now :-) Any comments warmly welcome. Thanks again for the responses and leading me into the right path Simon Weaver Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Tel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2006 11:27 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 MasterWi n2k3 I think you need rather to change the media type of the media. Currently they are HCART (as they are LTO1) - the L1 suffix shows that. This command may be what you need: Change a volume's media type /usr/openv/volmgr/bin/vmchange [-h volume_database_host] -new_mt media_type -m media_id Whatever you do make sure you 'suspend' the tapes so they cannot be written on by NBU. I don't think LTO3 can write on LTO1 but that will not stop NBU trying. Probably change to HCART3, but whatever the drive is. I am a little surprised you library is configured (or the old one was) to return the media type suffix to NBU (the 'L1'). Most people set up the robot to return the leading part of the barcode only, or tell NBU to mask out the L1, L2 etc if the library cannot do that. Otherwise you don't get many unique barcodes! William D L Brown WEAVER, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08-Feb-2006 10:48 To '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED], veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Wi n2k3 Bob To add to my earlier response, I went to the Reports Tool and done an IMAGES ON MEDIA REPORT for the Tape ID's needed. @The density shows HCART Could not perform Media Contents - again probably due to the drives being different! Simon Weaver Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Tel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bobby Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2006 10:39 To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Win2k3 You are going to have to change the drive type of one of the LTO3 tapes to LTO2. It is Backward compatible to read the tape, however, NB won't load the tape into a drive that is not of the same type. The image has the tape type. Make sure that NB sees the tape media as the correct type. By looking at your tape names, you may even have LTO1 media. You can do a bpimagelist -L -backupid your backup job id and it will show you what media type the image says it is on. Bobby Williams 2205 Peterson Drive Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 423-296-8200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:36 AM To: 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu' Subject: [Veritas-bu] Restore Failed Status 5 - NBU 5.1 MP2 Master Win2k3 Guys Wonder if you can help - trying to perform a restore from a month end backup from 6th Nov 05. Trouble is, in December, the Tape Library that was in use blew up and has now been replaced by a fancy new HP EVL Library using LTO3. The previos Library was LTO2 Using the BA and Restore tool, Netbackup sees the images and knows about the tapes. I loaded the tapes into the library, verified they are there and kicked off the restore. The following is logged in activity monitor.. 08/02/2006 09:00:56 - begin Restore 08/02/2006 09:00:56 - 1 images required 08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1278L1 required 08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1104L1 required 08/02/2006 09:00:56 - media 1286L1 required 08/02/2006 09:01:29 - restoring image 194.11.11.201_1131245815 08/02/2006 09:01:31 - started process bptm (3480) 08/02/2006 09:01:31 - mounting 1286L1 08/02/2006 09:01:31 - connecting 08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=3480) error requesting media, TpErrno = Requested number of drives are not configured 08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) The following files/folders were not restored: 08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/ 08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924) UTF - /K/Home_6/r/RICHAR_P/Shortcut to tesat.fs.lnk 08/02/2006 09:01:31 - Error bptm(pid=2924)
RE: [Veritas-bu] performance?
Just to add on this, I have personally taken caution not to use this, as I had problems with restores of the clients! Thanks Simon Weaver Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Tel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2006 11:36 To: Paul Keating Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] performance? Have you set NET_BUFFER_SZ at all on the clients? It may try and increase the throughput buffer wise from client end where it was using standard values before. Dave Paul Keating wrote: I can add more GigE cards.matter of fact the box already has a dual GigE NIC installed. But I don't want to add bigger doors in front of a small hallway. Ie...can the PCI bus/bridge support 2 more GigE NICs. Networks is monitoring my switch ports and showing me peaks less than 200Mb/s on each of my Gig cards.avg even less. I'm getting a sniffer ready to monitor my NICs for a few minutes during some peak periods..should be able to tell me if the server is congested and pushing back, or if the clients just aren't sending it fast enough. Looking at deploying some media servers this year anyway, so Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Austin Murphy Sent: February 7, 2006 2:58 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] performance? It looks like you are maxing out your Gigabit ethernet cards. My performance measurements of Gigabit ethernet were at best ~35MB/sec for one normal gigabit link. The only numbers I saw on the internet that were substantially higher used jumbo frames. I'm using an E450 (4x 296MHz) with a 4-port GigaSwift (2 ports live, 2 offline). I restricted the storage unit to only use 2 drives (LTO-2) at once, each of which maxes out at ~30MB/sec native. If you added a 4x GigaSwift card (or two) and arranged your network to make use of the extra Gigabit links, you could pump more data to your tapes. If you can spend a bit more money you might try a faster technology like 10GbE or IP over Fibrechannel. Beyond that I think you are looking at a media server. Austin Murphy On 2/7/06, Paul Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running a Sunfire V880. 4x 1.2 GHz Ultrasparc III+ proc. 8 Gig Ram 6 internal 72 Gig disks. 1st pair disks mirrored OS /, /usr, /opt, etc etc 2nd pair disks mirrored /opt/openv (replicated to a standby system using Veritas Volume Replicator) 3rd pair disks one slice mirrored for VVR's SRL logs remainder of the two disks concatenated into a 96 Gig FS for a DSSU for a couple of small clients on 10Mb/s HD encrypted links. Pair of FC200 HBAs in 66MHz PCI slots Pair of GigaSwift GigE cards in 33MHz PCI slots (only 2 66Mhz slots on the machine.) the HBAs each feed 7 tape drives and 1 robot.using Inline tape copy.the robots are essentially mirroredone onsite, one at the end of a DWDM link. I previously had only 3 drives at each site.and added the additional 4 at each site two weeks ago. with the 3 drives per site, I was getting approx 60MB/s total date to the three drives...so an avg of 20MB/s drive. The addidional drives were added for resiliency (Mgmt wanted two stus, one for dev, one for prod servers..so now we have a stu with 4 drives avail for prod, and 3 drives avail for dev) in the case where a client or two stuck at half duplex hangs up a drive all night, the remainder of jobs can finish... The problem is that, after adding the new tape drives, we don't get any more total throughputseemd stuck at about 60-65MB/s, but now spread among twice the tape drives. This means that since more machines are backing up concurrantly (allowed because of the increased number of drives) that each machine is backing up slower...in effect, each machine is taking twice as long to back upcausing some major issues. Anyone know of any particular configs or issues that may be affecting us here? benchmarks on processing required to manage this many ITC jobs? we didn't see a performance hit in the lab, but never had this big of a system in the lab to really load it. I've been doing consant IOstat and netstat monitoringno waits/queues/errors/collisions anywhere, except at one point for about 15 minutes during the FULL window on the weekend, a few waits accumulated on the disks the /opt/openv resides onbut the performance was the same during that period as the remaining 24+ hours, where there were no waits. any new ideas would be welcome. Thanks, Paul
Re: [Veritas-bu] performance?
To be honest i have too but assumed it was because i was on old kit and using DLT drives Something for the Dev portion i reckon and see if it alters anything. Dave WEAVER, Simon wrote: Just to add on this, I have personally taken caution not to use this, as I had problems with restores of the clients! Thanks Simon Weaver Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Tel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2006 11:36 To: Paul Keating Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] performance? Have you set NET_BUFFER_SZ at all on the clients? It may try and increase the throughput buffer wise from client end where it was using standard values before. Dave Paul Keating wrote: I can add more GigE cards.matter of fact the box already has a dual GigE NIC installed. But I don't want to add bigger doors in front of a small hallway. Ie...can the PCI bus/bridge support 2 more GigE NICs. Networks is monitoring my switch ports and showing me peaks less than 200Mb/s on each of my Gig cards.avg even less. I'm getting a sniffer ready to monitor my NICs for a few minutes during some peak periods..should be able to tell me if the server is congested and pushing back, or if the clients just aren't sending it fast enough. Looking at deploying some media servers this year anyway, so Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Austin Murphy Sent: February 7, 2006 2:58 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] performance? It looks like you are maxing out your Gigabit ethernet cards. My performance measurements of Gigabit ethernet were at best ~35MB/sec for one normal gigabit link. The only numbers I saw on the internet that were substantially higher used jumbo frames. I'm using an E450 (4x 296MHz) with a 4-port GigaSwift (2 ports live, 2 offline). I restricted the storage unit to only use 2 drives (LTO-2) at once, each of which maxes out at ~30MB/sec native. If you added a 4x GigaSwift card (or two) and arranged your network to make use of the extra Gigabit links, you could pump more data to your tapes. If you can spend a bit more money you might try a faster technology like 10GbE or IP over Fibrechannel. Beyond that I think you are looking at a media server. Austin Murphy On 2/7/06, Paul Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running a Sunfire V880. 4x 1.2 GHz Ultrasparc III+ proc. 8 Gig Ram 6 internal 72 Gig disks. 1st pair disks mirrored OS /, /usr, /opt, etc etc 2nd pair disks mirrored /opt/openv (replicated to a standby system using Veritas Volume Replicator) 3rd pair disks one slice mirrored for VVR's SRL logs remainder of the two disks concatenated into a 96 Gig FS for a DSSU for a couple of small clients on 10Mb/s HD encrypted links. Pair of FC200 HBAs in 66MHz PCI slots Pair of GigaSwift GigE cards in 33MHz PCI slots (only 2 66Mhz slots on the machine.) the HBAs each feed 7 tape drives and 1 robot.using Inline tape copy.the robots are essentially mirroredone onsite, one at the end of a DWDM link. I previously had only 3 drives at each site.and added the additional 4 at each site two weeks ago. with the 3 drives per site, I was getting approx 60MB/s total date to the three drives...so an avg of 20MB/s drive. The addidional drives were added for resiliency (Mgmt wanted two stus, one for dev, one for prod servers..so now we have a stu with 4 drives avail for prod, and 3 drives avail for dev) in the case where a client or two stuck at half duplex hangs up a drive all night, the remainder of jobs can finish... The problem is that, after adding the new tape drives, we don't get any more total throughputseemd stuck at about 60-65MB/s, but now spread among twice the tape drives. This means that since more machines are backing up concurrantly (allowed because of the increased number of drives) that each machine is backing up slower...in effect, each machine is taking twice as long to back upcausing some major issues. Anyone know of any particular configs or issues that may be affecting us here? benchmarks on processing required to manage this many ITC jobs? we didn't see a performance hit in the lab, but never had this big of a system in the lab to really load it. I've been doing consant IOstat and
[Veritas-bu] Unable to process request because the server resources are busy
Hi Gurus... What do you think the cause of the problem presented as the following... 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id sokrates_113881 failed, unable to process request because the se rver resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id diogenes_1138833346 copy 1 c reated on 02/02/2006 00:35:46 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid diogenes_1138833346 write failed, unable to process request beca use the server resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id diogenes_1138833346 failed, unable to process request because the se rver resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id yedeklemesrv_1138833488 copy 1 created on 02/02/2006 00:38:08 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid yedeklemesrv_1138833488 write failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id yedeklemesrv_1138833488 failed, unable to process request because th e server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id hercules_1138833519 copy 1 created on 02/02/2006 00:38:39 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid hercules_1138833519 write failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id hercules_1138833519 failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id fwmngt_1138833672 copy 1 cre ated on 02/02/2006 00:41:12 on source path D:\diskeyedek --More--(19%) Asiye Yigit Software Support Manager Gantek Technologies Direct : +90 0216 538 80 94 Fax: +90 0216 322 04 43 Gsm: +90 0532 409 80 46 Adress: Adres: Cumhuriyet Cad. Yeni Parseller Sk. No: 20 B Blok Kat:4-5 34805 Kavacik / İstanbul [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.gantek.com http://www.gantek.com/ This message and attachments are confidential and intended solely for the individual(s) stated in this message. If you received this message although you are not the addressee you are responsible to keep the message confidential. The sender has no responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of the information in the message and its attachments. Our company shall have no liability for any changes or late receiving, loss of integrity and confidentiality, viruses and any damagescaused in anyway to your computer system. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to process request because the server res ources are busy
Bit of a messy log (unless its come through my email system as a bit scrambled). Basically, from my own experience I have found is that tracker.exe is running on a client and there are multiple instances of bpbkar running (too many for my likeing) So I end up turning tracker off (if it's a windows client machine) I also turn off any AV, disk defragging software where possible too! Do the jobs re-queue and then eventually run and complete ok? Can also see this when multiple clients connect to the master server at the same time (ie: 50 or more so at once). Would probably need more info on your setup as well. Anyhow, that's from what I have seen in my environment. How powerful is the master server. Do you have multiple policies all running at the same time when this problem appears (ie: 7 policies all running at 7pm each evening) Thanks Simon Weaver Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Tel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Asiye Yigit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2006 13:11 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Unable to process request because the server resources are busy Hi Gurus... What do you think the cause of the problem presented as the following... 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id sokrates_113881 failed, unable to process request because the se rver resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id diogenes_1138833346 copy 1 c reated on 02/02/2006 00:35:46 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid diogenes_1138833346 write failed, unable to process request beca use the server resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id diogenes_1138833346 failed, unable to process request because the se rver resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id yedeklemesrv_1138833488 copy 1 created on 02/02/2006 00:38:08 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid yedeklemesrv_1138833488 write failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id yedeklemesrv_1138833488 failed, unable to process request because th e server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id hercules_1138833519 copy 1 created on 02/02/2006 00:38:39 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid hercules_1138833519 write failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id hercules_1138833519 failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id fwmngt_1138833672 copy 1 cre ated on 02/02/2006 00:41:12 on source path D:\diskeyedek --More--(19%) Asiye Yigit Software Support Manager Gantek Technologies Direct : +90 0216 538 80 94 Fax: +90 0216 322 04 43 Gsm: +90 0532 409 80 46 Adress: Adres: Cumhuriyet Cad. Yeni Parseller Sk. No: 20 B Blok Kat:4-5 34805 Kavacik / İstanbul [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.gantek.com http://www.gantek.com/ This message and attachments are confidential and intended solely for the individual(s) stated in this message. If you received this message although you are not the addressee you are responsible to keep the message confidential. The sender has no responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of the information in the message and its attachments. Our company shall have no liability for any changes or late receiving, loss of integrity and confidentiality, viruses and any damagescaused in anyway to your computer system. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify
[Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes!
Problem: I have a few tapes: L00123 L00124 L00125 I need to find the status of these tapes across multiple master servers. Is there a text equivalent to list all of the tapes in the: * Media and Device Management - Media In the Media Manager's Media List? I have several tapes I need to find the status of, whether they are frozen, expired or scratch, etc... bpmedialist does not show the complete listing of all of the media that has ever been in the robot. I am looking at the documentation now but thought I'd send this out if anyone knew it off the top of their head? Thanks, Justin.
[Veritas-bu] Command to list media servers?
Say I have a number of media servers, besides looking in /usr/openv/netbackup/bp.conf for them, which may also include non-media servers, is there a command that will show your currently registered media servers? Thanks, Justin.
RE: [Veritas-bu] Command to list media servers?
Title: Message How about BPGETCONFIG ? Is that of any help? Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2006 14:03To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Command to list media servers? Say I have a number of media servers, besides looking in /usr/openv/netbackup/bp.conf for them, which may also include non-media servers, is there a command that will show your currently registered media servers? Thanks, Justin. This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
Re: [Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes!
Yes, this'll work but I am trying to figure out the best way to do it via the command line as I am looking for tapes amongst a vast array of master media servers. Justin. On 2/8/06, WEAVER, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Justin Here to be proved wrong, but if Netbackup knows about the tapes, then surely they should be listed in the Reports Module Media Lists. Also, to prove if Netbackup does know about them and they are in the Robot, doing a Media Contents report will load the tape and give you all the backup ID's it knows about! Is this of any help? Simon WeaverTechnical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Justin Piszcz [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2006 13:46To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes! Problem: I have a few tapes: L00123 L00124 L00125 I need to find the status of these tapes across multiple master servers. Is there a text equivalent to list all of the tapes in the: * Media and Device Management - Media In the Media Manager's Media List? I have several tapes I need to find the status of, whether they are frozen, expired or scratch, etc... bpmedialist does not show the complete listing of all of the media that has ever been in the robot. I am looking at the documentation now but thought I'd send this out if anyone knew it off the top of their head? Thanks, Justin. This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
RE: [Veritas-bu] Command to list media servers?
Title: Message No problem! There may be other commands, but this is what sprang to mind Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2006 14:27To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command to list media servers? This was it, thanks! On 2/8/06, Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hm this works too, but in the host properties - media servers, bpgetconfig lists things that access the master server (and in the host properties-media servers it only lists the actual (real) media servers. On 2/8/06, WEAVER, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about BPGETCONFIG ? Is that of any help? Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Justin Piszcz [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2006 14:03To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Command to list media servers? Say I have a number of media servers, besides looking in /usr/openv/netbackup/bp.conf for them, which may also include non-media servers, is there a command that will show your currently registered media servers? Thanks, Justin. This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
[Veritas-bu] Email Notification from Netbackup 5.1 (Windows)
Hi All, We have one Master Server Netbackup 5.1 on Windows 2003 and 7 SAN Media Servers all on Windows except one media server on Solaris. Our customer Wants email notification only when backups have failed. Can anybody suggest Me how to notify only failed jobs. Regards V.T.Naidu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes!
Justin,
for tape in ID1 ID2 ID3 ID4...
do
for i in `bpstulist | awk '{print $3 | sort -u `
do
vmquery -m $tape -h $i
done
done
where ID1 ID2 ID3 ID4 etc are your media id's...
should do it...
JdS
Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/02/2006 14:19
To:WEAVER, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject:Re: [Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes!
Yes, this'll work but I am trying to figure out the best way to do it via the command line as I am looking for tapes amongst a vast array of master media servers.
Justin.
On 2/8/06, WEAVER, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin
Here to be proved wrong, but if Netbackup knows about the tapes, then surely they should be listed in the Reports Module Media Lists.
Also, to prove if Netbackup does know about them and they are in the Robot, doing a Media Contents report will load the tape and give you all the backup ID's it knows about!
Is this of any help?
Simon Weaver
Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium
Tel: 02392-708598
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 February 2006 13:46
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes!
Problem:
I have a few tapes:
L00123
L00124
L00125
I need to find the status of these tapes across multiple master servers.
Is there a text equivalent to list all of the tapes in the:
* Media and Device Management
- Media
In the Media Manager's Media List?
I have several tapes I need to find the status of, whether they are frozen, expired or scratch, etc...
bpmedialist does not show the complete listing of all of the media that has ever been in the robot.
I am looking at the documentation now but thought I'd send this out if anyone knew it off the top of their head?
Thanks,
Justin.
This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.
EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
RE: [Veritas-bu] performance?
Some.however, the performance difference between clients with NET_BUFFER_SIZE = 16k, and those set to 256k is negligable. Paul -Original Message- From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 8, 2006 6:36 AM To: Paul Keating Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] performance? Have you set NET_BUFFER_SZ at all on the clients? It may try and increase the throughput buffer wise from client end where it was using standard values before. Dave La version française suit le texte anglais. This email message from the Bank of Canada is given in good faith, and shall not be binding or construed as constituting any obligation on the part of the Bank. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Recipients are advised to apply their own virus checks to this message upon receipt. L'information communiquée dans les courriels en provenance de la Banque du Canada est soumise de bonne foi, mais elle ne saurait lier la Banque et ne doit aucunement être interprétée comme constituant une obligation de sa part. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. Dès la réception du présent message, le ou les destinataires doivent activer leur programme de détection de virus pour éviter toute contamination possible.
[Veritas-bu] Unsubscribe
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This communication including any information transmitted with it is intended only for the use of the addressees and is confidential. If you are not an intended recipient or responsible for delivering the message to an intended recipient, any review, disclosure, conversion to hard copy, dissemination, reproduction or other use of any part of this communication is strictly prohibited, as is the taking or omitting of any action in reliance upon this communication. If you receive this communication in error or without authorization please notify us immediately by return e-mail or otherwise and permanently delete the entire communication from any computer, disk drive, or other storage medium. If the above disclaimer is not properly readable, it can be found at www.td.com/legal AVERTISSEMENT DE CONFIDENTIALITE Ce courriel, ainsi que tout renseignement ci-inclus, destiné uniquement aux destinataires susmentionnés, est confidentiel. Si vous nêtes pas le destinataire prévu ou un agent responsable de la livraison de ce courriel, tout examen, divulgation, copie, impression, reproduction, distribution, ou autre utilisation dune partie de ce courriel est strictement interdit de même que toute intervention ou abstraction à cet égard. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur ou sans autorisation, veuillez en aviser immédiatement lexpéditeur par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen et supprimer immédiatement cette communication entière de tout système électronique. Si l'avis de non-responsabilité ci-dessus n'est pas lisible, vous pouvez le consulter à www.td.com/francais/legale
Re: [Veritas-bu] Unable to process request because the server resources are busy
The status 134 means there aren't enough tape drives to handle all the requests. In particular, this looks like a duplication right? If you run backups and duplications at the same time, the scheduler (pre-6.0) isn't fully aware of duplications and also, doesn't track the drive usage in a real-time fashion. Therefore, the scheduler can end up oversubscribing the resources (tape drives). The end result is that the media server will figure this out, give the message below, and requeue the job. -Tim On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Asiye Yiğit wrote: Hi Gurus... What do you think the cause of the problem presented as the following... 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id sokrates_113881 failed, unable to process request because the se rver resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id diogenes_1138833346 copy 1 c reated on 02/02/2006 00:35:46 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid diogenes_1138833346 write failed, unable to process request beca use the server resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id diogenes_1138833346 failed, unable to process request because the se rver resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id yedeklemesrv_1138833488 copy 1 created on 02/02/2006 00:38:08 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid yedeklemesrv_1138833488 write failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id yedeklemesrv_1138833488 failed, unable to process request because th e server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id hercules_1138833519 copy 1 created on 02/02/2006 00:38:39 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid hercules_1138833519 write failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id hercules_1138833519 failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id fwmngt_1138833672 copy 1 cre ated on 02/02/2006 00:41:12 on source path D:\diskeyedek --More--(19%) Asiye Yigit Software Support Manager Gantek Technologies Direct : +90 0216 538 80 94 Fax: +90 0216 322 04 43 Gsm: +90 0532 409 80 46 Adress: Adres: Cumhuriyet Cad. Yeni Parseller Sk. No: 20 B Blok Kat:4-5 34805 Kavacik / İstanbul [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.gantek.com http://www.gantek.com/ This message and attachments are confidential and intended solely for the individual(s) stated in this message. If you received this message although you are not the addressee you are responsible to keep the message confidential. The sender has no responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of the information in the message and its attachments. Our company shall have no liability for any changes or late receiving, loss of integrity and confidentiality, viruses and any damagescaused in anyway to your computer system. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Re: Veritas-bu digest, Vol 1 #4839 - 4 msgs
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 09:46 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 18:43:08 +0400 From: Naidu V. T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Email Notification from Netbackup 5.1 (Windows) Hi All, We have one Master Server Netbackup 5.1 on Windows 2003 and 7 SAN Media Servers all on Windows except one media server on Solaris. Our customer Wants email notification only when backups have failed. Can anybody suggest Me how to notify only failed jobs. Regards V.T.Naidu If you go to my website at http:/www.gurski.com/netbackup.php and select the windows command menu option, you will find several scripts available, including the one you want... Enjoy -- Ed Gurski [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to process request because the server resources are busy
This problem is actually addressed in 5.1 MP4 by allowing the use of /usr/openv/netbackup/STAGING_JOB_KB_LIMIT /usr/openv/netbackup/MAX_STAGING_JOBS as explained in technote 280398 Brooks, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/8/2006 11:23:45 AM So, will this mean a decrease in these errors, if seen in NBU 5.x, when one migrates to NBU 6.0? I've seen them too, and I'm also testing NBU 6 now before rolling to production. Jason From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tim Hoke Sent: Wed 2/8/2006 10:50 AM To: Asiye Yigit Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Unable to process request because the server resources are busy The status 134 means there aren't enough tape drives to handle all the requests. In particular, this looks like a duplication right? If you run backups and duplications at the same time, the scheduler (pre-6.0) isn't fully aware of duplications and also, doesn't track the drive usage in a real-time fashion. Therefore, the scheduler can end up oversubscribing the resources (tape drives). The end result is that the media server will figure this out, give the message below, and requeue the job. -Tim On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Asiye Yigit wrote: Hi Gurus... What do you think the cause of the problem presented as the following... 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id sokrates_113881 failed, unable to process request because the se rver resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id diogenes_1138833346 copy 1 c reated on 02/02/2006 00:35:46 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid diogenes_1138833346 write failed, unable to process request beca use the server resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id diogenes_1138833346 failed, unable to process request because the se rver resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id yedeklemesrv_1138833488 copy 1 created on 02/02/2006 00:38:08 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid yedeklemesrv_1138833488 write failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id yedeklemesrv_1138833488 failed, unable to process request because th e server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id hercules_1138833519 copy 1 created on 02/02/2006 00:38:39 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid hercules_1138833519 write failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id hercules_1138833519 failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id fwmngt_1138833672 copy 1 cre ated on 02/02/2006 00:41:12 on source path D:\diskeyedek --More--(19%) Asiye Yigit Software Support Manager Gantek Technologies Direct : +90 0216 538 80 94 Fax: +90 0216 322 04 43 Gsm: +90 0532 409 80 46 Adress: Adres: Cumhuriyet Cad. Yeni Parseller Sk. No: 20 B Blok Kat:4-5 34805 Kavacik / Istanbul [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.gantek.com http://www.gantek.com/ This message and attachments are confidential and intended solely for the individual(s) stated in this message. If you received this message although you are not the addressee you are responsible to keep the message confidential. The sender has no responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of the information in the message and its attachments. Our company shall have no liability for any changes or late receiving, loss of integrity and confidentiality, viruses and any damagescaused in anyway to your computer system. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist
RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to process request because the server resources are busy
Title: RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to process request because the server resources are busy Thanks Bob. We didn't apply MP4 since we're shortly moving to 6.0 MP1, or maybe MP2, if the move takes that long :-) Jason From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bob StumpSent: Wed 2/8/2006 11:46 AMTo: Brooks, Jason; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to process request because the server resources are busy This problem is actually addressed in 5.1 MP4 by allowing the use of/usr/openv/netbackup/STAGING_JOB_KB_LIMIT/usr/openv/netbackup/MAX_STAGING_JOBSas explained in technote 280398 "Brooks, Jason" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/8/2006 11:23:45 AM So, will this mean a decrease in these errors, if seen in NBU 5.x, when one migrates to NBU 6.0?I've seen them too, and I'm also testing NBU 6 now before rolling to production.JasonFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tim HokeSent: Wed 2/8/2006 10:50 AMTo: Asiye YigitCc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Unable to process request because the server resources are busyThe status 134 means there aren't enough tape drives to handle all therequests.In particular, this looks like a duplication right? If you run backupsand duplications at the same time, the scheduler (pre-6.0) isn't "fullyaware" of duplications and also, doesn't track the drive usage in a"real-time" fashion. Therefore, the scheduler can end up oversubscribingthe "resources" (tape drives). The end result is that the media serverwill figure this out, give the message below, and requeue the job.-TimOn Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Asiye Yigit wrote: Hi Gurus... What do you think the cause of the problem presented as the following... 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id sokrates_113881 failed, unable to process request because the se rver resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id diogenes_1138833346 copy 1 c reated on 02/02/2006 00:35:46 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid diogenes_1138833346 write failed, unable to process request beca use the server resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id diogenes_1138833346 failed, unable to process request because the se rver resources are busy (134). 02:52:40.498 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id yedeklemesrv_1138833488 copy 1 created on 02/02/2006 00:38:08 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid yedeklemesrv_1138833488 write failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id yedeklemesrv_1138833488 failed, unable to process request because th e server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id hercules_1138833519 copy 1 created on 02/02/2006 00:38:39 on source path D:\diskeyedek 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - host yedeklemesrv backupid hercules_1138833519 write failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicate of backup id hercules_1138833519 failed, unable to process request because the server resources are busy (134). 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 02:53:25.999 [3696.444] 2 ds_dup: read from job 1 INF - Duplicating policy Sistem_State_2003 schedule gunluk backup id fwmngt_1138833672 copy 1 cre ated on 02/02/2006 00:41:12 on source path D:\diskeyedek --More--(19%) Asiye Yigit Software Support Manager Gantek Technologies Direct : +90 0216 538 80 94 Fax : +90 0216 322 04 43 Gsm : +90 0532 409 80 46 Adress: Adres: Cumhuriyet Cad. Yeni Parseller Sk. No: 20 B Blok Kat:4-5 34805 Kavacik / Istanbul [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.gantek.com http://www.gantek.com/ "This message and attachments are confidential and intended solely for the individual(s) stated in this message. If you received this message although you are not the addressee you are responsible to keep the message confidential. The sender has no responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of the information in the message and its attachments. Our company shall have
RE: [Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes!
Your loop below searches the media servers for a volDB, not a list of master
servers. vmquery is specific to the volume database, there's only one per
environment and it's usually on the master server.
Frozen/suspended is per media server, but the volDB contains everything
else.
This is ugly but:
for tape in tape1 tape2 tape3 ...
do
echo ## $tape
for master in master1 master2 master3 ...
do
vmquery -h $master -m $tape 2/dev/null
if [ $? -eq 0 ]
then
for mediasvr in `bpstulist -M $master | awk '{print $3}' | sort -u`
do
bpmedialist -m $tape -M $master -h $mediasvr 2/dev/null
done
else
echo ## Tape $tape not in VolDB on $master.
fi
done
done
This can be prettified a bunch but it's functional. Watch out for line-wrap
issues in this posting.
Note also this this is untested but I think, if nothing else, that the logic
is sound.
-M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:58 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes!
Justin,
for tape in ID1 ID2 ID3 ID4...
do
for i in `bpstulist | awk '{print $3 | sort -u `
do
vmquery -m $tape -h $i
done
done
where ID1 ID2 ID3 ID4 etc are your media id's...
should do it...
JdS
Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/02/2006 14:19
To:WEAVER, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject:Re: [Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes!
Yes, this'll work but I am trying to figure out the best way to do it via
the command line as I am looking for tapes amongst a vast array of master
media servers.
Justin.
On 2/8/06, WEAVER, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin
Here to be proved wrong, but if Netbackup knows about the tapes, then surely
they should be listed in the Reports Module Media Lists.
Also, to prove if Netbackup does know about them and they are in the Robot,
doing a Media Contents report will load the tape and give you all the
backup ID's it knows about!
Is this of any help?
Simon Weaver
Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium
Tel: 02392-708598
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 February 2006 13:46
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes!
Problem:
I have a few tapes:
L00123
L00124
L00125
I need to find the status of these tapes across multiple master servers.
Is there a text equivalent to list all of the tapes in the:
* Media and Device Management
- Media
In the Media Manager's Media List?
I have several tapes I need to find the status of, whether they are frozen,
expired or scratch, etc...
bpmedialist does not show the complete listing of all of the media that has
ever been in the robot.
I am looking at the documentation now but thought I'd send this out if
anyone knew it off the top of their head?
Thanks,
Justin. This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate
or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.
EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] performance?
Unless I am missing something here IPMP only increases throughput on the outbound side of the server. Media servers are typically bringing data in from the network. Without further fiddling, that is correct. If you could get some clients to use one IP address for the media server and other clients to use another, then you could have each of those addresses using separate links. IPMP doesn't give you any tools to help you balance them, though. -- Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] [Job] Sr Backup Engineer - Houston
Hi, To anyone who's looking, we are currently doing a search for a Sr Backup Engineer in Houston. It's a full-time permanent position with a company that has a very large environment. Compensation is highly competitive. Contact Josh at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if interested. -- Sr Backup Engineer Troubleshoot, perform root cause analysis, identify and isolate technical issues, and work in a collaborative effort with other team members as necessary to quickly and effectively resolve technical issues and provide timely status and progress reporting. Experience and Skills Required: 8+ years experience Veritas NetBackup - version 3.4 or greater Veritas Backup Exec SAN and NAS technologies (HDS, NetApp and EMC) Experience with Windows and UNIX Oracle or SQL Sever databases Clustered servers ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes!
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:46:24AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: Problem: I have a few tapes: L00123 L00124 L00125 I need to find the status of these tapes across multiple master servers. # vmquery -m L00123 .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Email Notification from Netbackup 5.1 (Windows)
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:43:08PM +0400, Naidu V. T. wrote: We have one Master Server Netbackup 5.1 on Windows 2003 and 7 SAN Media Servers all on Windows except one media server on Solaris. Our customer Wants email notification only when backups have failed. Can anybody suggest Me how to notify only failed jobs. Edit backup_exit_notify on the master server to do what you want. I don't know what it looks like on Windows, but on Solaris it's easy to test the final status code to see if it's non-zero. I think that Veritas has some info on this on their web site too. .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes!
Thanks for all the help!
On 2/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Justin, for tape in ID1 ID2 ID3 ID4...
do for i in `bpstulist | awk '{print $3 | sort -u ` do
vmquery -m $tape -h $i done done
where ID1 ID2 ID3 ID4 etc are your media id's... should do it... JdS
Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/02/2006 14:19
To:WEAVER, Simon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject:Re: [Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes!
Yes, this'll work but I am trying to figure out the best way to do it via the command line as I am looking for tapes amongst a vast array of master media servers.
Justin.On 2/8/06, WEAVER, Simon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Justin
Here to be proved wrong, but if Netbackup knows about the tapes, then surely they should be listed in the Reports Module Media Lists.
Also, to prove if Netbackup does know about them and they are in the Robot, doing a Media Contents report will load the tape and give you all the backup ID's it knows about!
Is this of any help?
Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator
EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598
Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2006 13:46To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Help finding the status of tapes!
Problem: I have a few tapes:
L00123 L00124 L00125 I need to find the status of these tapes across multiple master servers.
Is there a text equivalent to list all of the tapes in the:
* Media and Device Management - Media
In the Media Manager's Media List? I have several tapes I need to find the status of, whether they are frozen, expired or scratch, etc...
bpmedialist does not show the complete listing of all of the media that has ever been in the robot.
I am looking at the documentation now but thought I'd send this out if anyone knew it off the top of their head?
Thanks, Justin.
This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
