Title: Message
Do not Symatec have any good report tool for this I
heard that report tolls in NBU 6. should be good??
but I dont have that confirmed we are still running
on 5.1 mp4
MVH / Fredrik DahlbergRikspolisstyrelsenNational Police
BoardTele arb: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 65E-mail: [EMAIL
I've done something similar which is adopted as a DR method by the
customer. Its perhaps not as fancy as below but carries the same
important feature. The master server at DR site is the same hostname as
the Production site. This was critical in getting the DR process to work.
All i do is backup
Title: Message
Netbackup 6 has whats called NOM, Netbackup Operations
Manager. It's pretty slick in my opinion. But compared to Advanced
Reporter in Netbackup 5.1, I don't know how it compares. I've only ever
used Netbackup 6. In NOM, you get an overview screen that will tell you
how many
Does anyone have any gotchas with running NOM on a separate server from
NBU itself? I thought I'd read that it's doable, but I haven't taken
the plunge yet. When I tested it, it was quite contrary to come up at
times, causing NBU to be down. But it might have been the aged hardware
used.
Jason
Dave
That sounds good! I sadly DON'T have a DR plan of sort, but I have a process
where the Catalog tapes and ones to disk are replicated around a site - so
in the event of the Master going pear-shaped (and assuming the robot is all
ok!!), restore via bprecover same drive config / MP, ect and
It depends, are you using NBAC and VxSS or not?
If you are you'll have to create trust relationships, and screw with the
hell that is NBAC and VxSS.
If your not, all you have to do is add the NOM server to the trusted
server list on each master to enable NOM to collect data from the
server.
I'm
Greetings,
I have Veritas Netbackup 3.4.1 running on a Win 2K box. It has a robot
unit connected directly to it - works fine, but I need to restore some
files from an expired full backup and am having difficulty. I started by
importing all of the expired tapes with the Phase 1 import as
I ran it on an old, 1 gHz Windows 2K box. If on my current master, it's
Win2K3 2+ gHz.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Sponsler, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 10:34 AM
To: Brooks, Jason; Fredrik Dahlberg;
We're trying, yet again, to test a BMR restore on a Dell server. In
order to get it to boot, I've been trying to find a DOS driver for a
Dell Perc 3/di RAID controller. The only ones I've found are either on
a boot disk or Windows only. Has anyone had success in using BMR with
this, or a
Hi Group
Think this little question slipped under the radar,
anyone had to force users to use an alternate path when
restoring.
Scenario
windows SAN media server, using bpstart_notify to
snap_mirror disks and then backup BC , problem is that if a user restores from
media server during
Title: Message
Very Funny Paul :-)
Have tired both, problem is if disabled our team gets
bombarded .
Regards
Dave
From: Paul Keating
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2006
16:58To: Clooney, David;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Only
restore to
Title: Message
user
education, and if that doesn't work, disable client initiated
restores.
;o)
--
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Clooney, DavidSent: August 1, 2006 11:18 AMTo:
Hi,
What do you think about VTL?
Are you using VTL? what model?
EMC DL710 or NetApp VTL600?
What about Storagetek?
Thanks in advance.
Juan
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Yes, we are. We currently have about 133TB of space using the NetApp
VTL600's.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juan Pablo
Almeida
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 9:13 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Anyone
Thanks Kate,
As I stated in my original post, I Phase 1 imported all of the tapes
that were expired. There are no other tapes to import, so all of the
images are somewhere on those tapes. Do I need to somehow tell Netbackup
where each part of the image is? If so, how do I find out where the
Hi Liddle,
Are you satisfied with this equipment?
Are you using compression enabled? What performance are you
obtaining?
How many TB are you writing daily?
Why do you choose Netapp?
We are looking for a VTL solution, but in Brazil is very
difficul to find
Juan,
It's Stuart (Liddle is my last name)
Yes, we are satisfied with the equipment
Nonot using compression (tape optimization) on the VTL, because we are
doing compression when we go to physical tape.
I have not run any numbers on the performance, but overall just by looking
at the job
There are many VTLS on the market. And usually come at a steep price. Note
you are actually purchasing disk at a premium prices with limited
expandability. Adding cheap linux mediaservers with cheap raid disk is
arguably a cheaper solution.
jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree with Jim. Inexpensive disk used along with disk staging and some tape is a much better value than buying a VTL that will emulate a robot and drives. Before you buy a VTL you really need to ask yourself what specific problem you are trying to solve.
johnOn 8/1/06, Jim Horalek [EMAIL
importing all of the expired tapes with the Phase 1 import as follows:
bpimport - create_db_info -id Ax
I then looked at the dates and found the tape that contained
the first part of the image I needed to restore the full
backup. I then tried the Phase 2 import as follows:
VTL
are expensive, however the limits I would disagree. We have a Sepaton (70+ Tb of
usable - note not RAW) and I believe the limits on the Sepaton is in
Petabytes.
Disk
Staging is a nice concept, however with that you are placing a lot of the
responsibility back on the admin.
Juan,
I would have to agree with John Howard on this. We looked
at VTL for our backup environment but before we could see where to put
it.We asked ourselves what problem(s) are we trying to solve. In
some cases the VTL can give performance boosts where tape drives are the
bottleneck.
I guess this begs the question to the audience and the
people that have put in VTL's ... what problems does a VTL solve that D2D can
not?
I think the list so far is:
1. Administration is easier
2. Possibly performance
3. Compression (1/2 the disk of
D2D)
4. I can use it to stress test a
Title: Message
Some
VTL products' de-duplication technology is eons beyond compression, with low
level pattern matching, etc, etc, enabling upt to 25:1 effective
"compression".
VTL
allows you to pool disk on a single VTL that can be shared to multiple media
servers asvirtual tape drives,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-08-01 14:29]:
I guess this begs the question to the audience and the people that have
put in VTL's ... what problems does a VTL solve that D2D can not?
I think the list so far is:
1. Administration is easier
2. Possibly performance
3.
Title: Message
Unfortunately no
one has answered Juan's question.
Any Data Domain,
Reo, Septon, Falcon Storusers out there?
Jim
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
KeatingSent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 12:52 PMTo:
You don't need a DOS driver for the Perc RAID cards. The disk read and
writes are allowed using interrupts through the Adapter BIOS.
You will need to make sure you have the right DOS network driver. If it
is the Dual port Intel-Based GigE, then make sure you hae the correct
E1000.DOS driver -
The version of the DOS driver can also
greatly affect the restoration speed. Drivers from broadcom.com have worked
better for me than the one that were on support.dell.com but you're milage
may vary. :)
Karl
Ray Schafer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/01/2006 05:55 PM
Advantage on Data domain is very fast restores.
You can also configure it with SSO. and share between media servers. So you can
backup and duplicate from the same VTL on multiple media servers.
--- Jim Horalek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately no one has answered Juan's question.
Any
29 matches
Mail list logo
