Title: Message
You
have to buy them.
Check
with your Symantec Rep or Reseller
Heres
the SKU
N160108 NetBackup,Windows,v6.0,English,Documentation Kit $300
list
For
Unix
N16010B NetBackup,Linux/UNIX,v6.0,English,Documentation Kit $300
list
Agemts
and Options have ther own SKUS as well.
Also the afs limitation is for the 6.0 client only.
You can still run Netbackup 6.0 server just use a 5.x client
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 1:55 PM
To: Kathryn Hemness
Cc:
Anyone know how to move media from on mastet to another master?
Cavat old server is an Sgi(Unix) New server is Windows.
Note: I'm not trying to keep the same hostname for the master.
Bpmedia ?? NBU 5.0
Thanks.
Jim
___
Veritas-bu maillist -
There are many VTLS on the market. And usually come at a steep price. Note
you are actually purchasing disk at a premium prices with limited
expandability. Adding cheap linux mediaservers with cheap raid disk is
arguably a cheaper solution.
jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Message
Unfortunately no
one has answered Juan's question.
Any Data Domain,
Reo, Septon, Falcon Storusers out there?
Jim
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
KeatingSent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 12:52 PMTo:
Title: Message
I've been told
demand as fallen for SDLT. Sales of SDLT 600 are below 5% of
LTO-3.
Jim
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin,
Jonathan (Contractor)Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 8:46
AMTo:
Title: Message
Some questions about
RMAN Scripts and Netbackup Agent.
If an Netbackup Job
Fails(RMAN job) does this get sent back to RMAN in any way? Tivoli TSM
supposedly does this now.
Netbackup didn't in
the past has anything changed.
Can you do a RMAN
duplex_copy directing streams to
Out of the Licensing Guide
NetBackup Shared Storage Option is licensed per shared tape drive,
regardless of the manufacturer, type of device, or number of NetBackup
Servers attached to the SAN. The NetBackup Shared Storage Option license is
in addition to any required NetBackup Library Based Tape
You might want to look at the Netbackup Desktop/Laptop Option for backing up
Pst's since I believe its designed to backup delta blocks not files.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin,
Jonathan (Contractor)
Sent: Thursday, August 31,
Actually there are three DLO's now.
Backup Exec DLO-Does not do Deltas except for PST's(according to docs)
Netbackup DLO (admittedly this is the same as BackupExec DLO) Claims Deltas
though
And Netbackup Puredisk. Deltas, Compliancy lot of other stuff. Agents maybe.
Puredisk runs on Suse Linux
I believe Scott is correct. There were a few policy changes since the
product 6.0 was delivered.
Unfortunately they are not well documented. Vmware was a special case.
Once license of each type to be backed up should all you need.
However, the Symantec/Veritas License desk has the final say.(Tech
Make sure you contact your local Veritas Sales Represenative.
They can push support for fast response.
This is standard operating procedure for any Hardware/Software Manufacturer.
Your reseller is another channel to use.
Don't just let Support push you around.
Jim
-Original Message-
Netbackup 6 only has three mediaserver licenses.
Netbackup Server (This similiar to 4.5 Business Server)
Netbackup Enterprise Server (This does San and Non-San)
Netbackup San Server (San only-Backs itself up only-No clients)
San Server is 1/2 the price of a full server.
There use to be a San
Netbackup will ship on 34 CD's or 4 DVD's. Separate kits. Choose one.
Not sure if you would get 34 CD's or just what you need.
Jim
_
Netscape. Just the Net You Need.
___
Veritas-bu maillist
On a similar note how does NDMP play with Disk de-dup? All of the de-dups
I've seem are NAS devices. NDMP only talks to tape or VTL. Are there VTL's
with De-dup that would solve the NDMP problem?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Anyone running 6.5? Has Symantec updated the install-clients scripts for ssh
installation?
Jim
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Great. Thanks to all.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Kristofer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 2:32 PM
To: Jim Horalek
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5 ssh installation?
Yep, and sftp.
# /usr/openv/netbackup/bin
Complaints about blat are silly.
Code it in VB and support it your self.
http://www.freevbcode.com/ShowCode.asp?ID=6915
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustin
Damour
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 9:09 PM
To:
Standalone tape drives are free. Only ones in a Library/Autoloader will cost
you.
You pay for each tape drive in a library you USE with netbackup.
Whether or not Netbackup checks licensing is up to you to determine.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
The Default Fragment size was orginally 2048 Megabytes.
This was raised to 524,288 megabytes in 5.x or 6.x?? At least for disk. If
I remember right, it was raised to reduce disk fragmentation with Disk
Units.
jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone install Netbackup 6.5 on a Master Server Solaris 10 x64 zfs
filesystem. Any know issues?
Thanks
Jim
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
I'm getting ready to do Migration from a 5.1mp6 Sparc(V880-Sol 9) to a 6.5
Solaris 10 X64 server(x4500) (same hostname).
I was planning on just doing a catalog backup and recovery to the new server
but I'm doubting this will work.
Instead I'll probably need to upgrade the V880 to 6.5.1 before I
The Symantec forums have been around for a while. They gotten much better.
I have them as an RSS feed on my Google page.
Bob Stump hangs out there a lot.
The old farts hang out here.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rob worman
Just as an asside, how many people are building Master servers on SATA?
Thumper is a big box of SATA. Whats the performance of NBU 6.5 on SATA
anyway?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Bryer
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 3:52 PM
Enterprise Client
Its actually part of the Enterprise Client.
The NetBackup Enterprise Client contains the functionality of the Standard
Client
plus many more advanced features that maximize backup performance while
potentially reducing impact of backups such as Snapshot client (formerly
known as
You might want to compare the output of tpconfig -d and scan. Make sure the
robotic paths are the same. Scan will show the current path. tpconfig will
show whats in the database.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JC Cheney
Sent:
Nor will it tell you if your backups are any good. Only a restore will tell
you that.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank
Pettinato
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:18 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re:
I think were slamming one vendor prematurely. All these de-dup devices work.
But they are not all the same. They all have different features and solve
differnet problems. You should test any device first to see if will be of
any value in your environment.
Jim
-Original Message-
From:
Been a long time since I've done Informix but CLIENT_READ_TIMEOUT? needs to
be large 1/2 hour to 1hour. Same issues with Oracle. The time to get the
database ready to start sending data can be significant.
I believe the timeout values can be assocated with the User Account the
backup is driven
Could be. Informix was on the Media Server. And like I said its a while ago.
I just remember doing a lot of things to ~/bp.conf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 11:14 AM
To: Jim Horalek
The Advanced Disk option is now included in the Enterprise Client.
It includes San Media Client and Server all the off host disk options lot of
other stuff.
The Enterprise Client is Tiered (1,2,3,4) roughly determined by the cpu
count(or capability) though you will need your specifc model
A word of caution. I just rolled back 6.5.2A to 6.5.2 then to 6.5.1. I lost
all my Storage Life Cycle policies and couldn't rebuild them. I kept getting
an intermittent connectivity error. Nbstl -l was empty. (Master Suse Linux
IA64)
Happy ending I just re-did 6.5.2A and my policies returned.
The San Client and Snapshotting are separate features, with 6.5 they are
packaged with the Enterprise Client.
Here the blurb on the CDW website
NetBackup introduces a new client called the Enterprise Client, which
combines all of advanced capabilities in one easy package. NetBackup
Enterprise
Standard Client - Client backups, Software Encryption and Bare Metal
Restore.
Enterprise Client includes, Snapshots, San Media Server, San Client, Vmware
VCB, plus Standard Client
Jim
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Xen is licensed the same way Vmware is licensed.
You need one license for each OS (windows,linux,unix) on the physical box.
The maxiumn license count would be 3. (me thinks)
You can also purchase the Enterprise Client the same way. However the
Enterprise Client is Tiered based on the physical
In a Nutshell the Enterprise Client provides Flashbackup. Flashbackup allows
for the individual restore of files as well has the whole volume. As to
whether you will use those features thats another story.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Martin,
What was the issue with the Sun StorageTek 5320?
Someone is trying to give me one.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Martin,
Jonathan
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 9:11 PM
To:
You don't need the tape license since standalone is free. You don't need a
San for a San Mediaserver.
A restore might work since its restricted to local backups.
You might be able to duplicate it to another Full Mediaserver and do the
restore from there.
Jim
-Original Message-
From:
The is no difference between the Eval version and the current version. Alway
install the latest. Adding a real license is done in the GUI probably under
help.
Installing a new or same version will not destroy the configuration. Though
features that you may have been testing under the eval may not
You might try bpduplicate if desperation prevails.
If you have a problem duplicating you'll get a error.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
william.d.br...@gsk.com
Sent: Tuesday, June
/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bpgetconfig -s hostname or some
variant.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Reynolds,
Susan K.
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 4:24 PM
To:
Client pack is darn Huge.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 11:23 AM
To: Spearman, David; 'Cornely, David';
I have a bit of an oddity.
I'm testing Synthetic Backups.
I have
Day 1 Full backup.
Day 2 Incremental
Day 3 Synthetic-Full
Day 4 Incremental (and manually expire the Day 1 Full)
Day 5 Full backup runs
So it appears I need to keep the Full backup around even though the
Synthetic Full
Thanks all,
Though keeping the orginal full around(to create other synthetics) does seem
a bit strange. Hopefully Netbackup will mature to elimnate the constraint.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu]
Yeh, I'm not crazy! Or at least about this one.
Thanks Jim H
From another JimH
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jim H
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 8:59 AM
To:
As I stated in a previous post.
The issue here may not be Synthetic Backups.
An unsheduled Full backup(not synthetic) runs the next day !!!after I expire
the original full!!! The original Full was run manually. Using Calendar
based with no date to start.
Remember this was just a test to see
Defintely all new Media Server should be 64bit for any OS
32 bit will not be supported for Servers in future NBU releases.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Well there never has been a Master License.
Netbackup Server is a Product for those who don't need or want another
mediaserver.
Netbackup is focused on the Large Enterprise. Hence Symantec pushs the
Enterprise Server.
You can do a lot now with just one server. 6-12 cores on a tier 1,2 server.
The Standard server license need an upgrade license to a full mediaserver.
There is no sku to upgrade to a SAN enterprise server. (or Enterprise Client
as the license might be called under 6.5
Jim
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
I did a little more thing on this. You just need to buy the Enterprise
Client, San Media server is included with it.
Jim
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Horalek
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 7:54 AM
Licensing is the same as Vmware. Your choice of many methods. A client is
just one option
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-
boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WALLEBROEK Bart
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 10:30 AM
Dc is common in high density computing. It can deliver power much more
efficiently. You have large bus bars running through your racks.
Rackable(now Sgi) builds systems like these. Sun now Oracle makes a lot of
DC telcom versions of their systems. Don't know about Storage though.
jim
Are the drives really there?
# mt -f /dev/rmt/3cbn status
Jim
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of ddobek
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 11:33 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject:
I've been using offline catalogs and have now switched to online catalogs
(6.5.4)
I've started duplicating the images using the duplicate_images script in the
goodies directory.
I'm not using any switches (except -dp and -dstunit) so its duplicating
everything (all clients, all policies etc)
Thanks j.onathan,
But should I have a separate offsite_catalog pool? Or is it just more overhead
and my dazed mind.
The duplication script only call a single destination pool OFFSITE
From: Martin, Jonathan [mailto:jmart...@intersil.com]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 8:02 AM
To: Jim Horalek
I like the inline method.
Thanks,
Jim
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of stefanos
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 5:07 AM
To: 'WEAVER, Simon (external)'; Jim Horalek; 'Martin, Jonathan';
'VERITAS-BU
My email system is broken. Does anyone know of any tricks to get the emails
sent by the catalog backups. Perhaps a temp file.
Red hat 5.2
Or is there a command to generate it?
Thanks jim
___
Veritas-bu maillist -
So my recovery should be to just point to the last Catalog_Backup_FULL? Or the
last Incremental?
Thanks
Jim
From: scott.geo...@parker.com [mailto:scott.geo...@parker.com]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:15 PM
To: Jim Horalek
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Dr email
No, but the actual DR files
. The Catalog Backup emails document the recovery process
better than I can write.
jim
-Original Message-
From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:simon.wea...@astrium.eads.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 11:51 PM
To: Jim Horalek; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Dr
Getting new keys can be a pain. Hopefully you received your entitlement letter
from Symantec.
Otherwise start the process by placing a call to Symantec(ask for a new
entitlement letter and double check the email address) .
You can request eval licenses if your in a jam.
It's not automatic.
It
You forget the obvious. DNS.
Client Short names vs FQDN
Jim
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Whelan, Patrick
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:12 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu]
What kind of archiving solutions are you guys using. I have a lot of temp data
that people think the need for years. Stuff that can be recreated.
HPC stuff.
It's more a political issue.
This is all file data residing on an IBM gpfs filesystem. We using
Netbackup(Redhat x64) for backups. We
To: Jim Horalek
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups
From what I've read, and from what Curtis says below, you DON'T need to keep
the original full backup around, once you've created at least one more
synethtic full backup. You can do just one full
63 matches
Mail list logo
