Re: [Veritas-bu] Fame at last.

2006-09-07 Thread bob944
From some strange Oliver-Stoneish planet, Jeff Lightner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote The downside to an article like this is that pinhead execs instead of deciding to fix the problems may decide it is better to suppress forums like this and start lawsuits for libel to do that. and followed that

Re: [Veritas-bu] Cancel bpimport?

2006-08-30 Thread bob944
For some investigation and other work, I did phase 1 bpimports of a few tapes. Now the work is done and I won't be doing phase 2. Is there a way to tell netbackup to forget the phase 1 step? I'd rather not have the 'bpimport -p' output cluttered with these old tapes forever. I didn't

Re: [Veritas-bu] wanted to understand the catalog in netbackup

2006-08-17 Thread bob944
You didn't specify the release. Assuming pre-NetBackup 6.0 cold catalog backups here. 1. Is All catalog information which I need to restore/backup contained in the master server. Restore, yes. I mean if one media server has gone, does the information in master server contains the

Re: [Veritas-bu] RMAN - vague status different in GUI

2006-08-11 Thread bob944
While I find that RMAN backup configured by the DBA has completed sucessfully, the RMAN logs tell a different story. First, have your DBA demonstrate a successful RMAN backup to a channel of type disk, which requires only two RMAN commands totalling seven words. That will have no NetBackup

Re: [Veritas-bu] Bparchive status

2006-08-10 Thread bob944
Windows 2000 and 2003 clients Netbackup 5.1 mp4 Solaris master/media The bparchive is setup as a user backup bparchive is a user archive, not a user backup. Details are important. and scripted in a dos.bat file. PROBLEM: We have been forced to archive

[Veritas-bu] Reference points for incrementals (was: NetBackup 5.1 MP3 Policies)

2006-08-10 Thread bob944
That is correct. You MUST have the fulls and incs in the SAME policy for the incs to work. Otherwise, they have nothing to compare against and have no way to actually do an incremental backup. Correct enough, in the context of explaining NetBackup to the neophyte as you and the previous

Re: [Veritas-bu] New 6.0MP3 Master server, old 5.1MP3 Media

2006-08-08 Thread bob944
I haven't been able to find the answer to this question in the SAG... Be sure you're familiar with the DR procedures section of the Troubleshooting Guide, and the Release Notes and the Impact Guide as well (Veritas support site, NetBackup 6 manuals). Your plan: - v5master, v5media, two weeks

Re: [Veritas-bu] SQL Database Restore Failing

2006-08-08 Thread bob944
Message: 5 Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 21:14:41 +0530 From: praveen sundriyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Veritas-bu] SQL Database Restore Failing To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Re: [Veritas-bu] image imports

2006-08-04 Thread bob944
I am in the midst of trying to import images on a remote disk unit (Data Domains). We have a separate NBU 6 server at the BCP site. The data was backed up in our production environment. We used the bundled replication software (within the arrays) to replicate the data to the BCP site.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Help importing expired backups

2006-08-01 Thread bob944
importing all of the expired tapes with the Phase 1 import as follows: bpimport - create_db_info -id Ax I then looked at the dates and found the tape that contained the first part of the image I needed to restore the full backup. I then tried the Phase 2 import as follows:

Re: [Veritas-bu] EOM and stat 84 (was: Space left on Tape)

2006-07-19 Thread bob944
Hi Bob Re: the EOM - End Of Media - any ideas why then, that Netbackup is reporting status 84 for them? Just bit confused why it only seems to be happenign on the Media Servers and nothing else Simon - found your posting in v3#62. Can't tell from your description, but I'll guess that your

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup buffers

2006-07-18 Thread bob944
Need one urgent help, MY company has asked me to implement the Netbackup buffers, So you, as a responsible professional, have by read the Backup Planning and Performance Tuning Guide, by now, correct? What are your questions after that? It would be irresponsible to muck around with

Re: [Veritas-bu] Space left on Tape

2006-07-18 Thread bob944
Dudes is there any way of saying how much space is left on a particular tape? I have had a look around but am a bit lost. Yeah, run bpmedialist and compare with vmquery. That answer makes no sense. Dave, a tape holds as much as it holds, period. In contrast to a disk (has _exactly_ so

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 Upgrade Checklist

2006-07-13 Thread bob944
Looking to take the plunge to 6.0, we need to for SPS2003 backups. I am looking for a checklist for the upgrade process. We are a Windows shop, I have a 2003 Master, 1 x Win2k3 Media server and 4 x Win2k SAN media servers that I need to upgrade. All servers are at 5.1 MP4. The 6.0

Re: [Veritas-bu] Staging option not showing up

2006-07-11 Thread bob944
I'm not able to see the staging option in the New Storage Unit option dialog window. I've updated the Remote Administration Console to MP3 and still unable to see it. Is this a bug in the GUI and is there a work around through the CLI that I can get this turned on and working? You'll want

Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO3 Drive Speed Poll

2006-07-11 Thread bob944
The group I work with is expecting 160-200MB/s megabytes per second on an LTO3 with compression. [...] So nobody gets 160-200MB/s even with 2:1 compression? You missed the previous poster's (Wilts) point: you haven't isolated tape speed from the process of getting data to it. Read the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Inconsistencies with some open file issues?

2006-07-06 Thread bob944
I'm finding the open file thing a bit hit and miss to be honest. Demystification summary: VSP is default: on only if you install it (why would you install it and want it to default to off?) and the installation of VSP's predecessor included a boot to make it active. You first control VSP by

Re: [Veritas-bu] status 1 (was: Typical success rates?)

2006-06-30 Thread bob944
Exclude the 1's as I dont class them as failures :-) Which might be why NetBackup defines stat 1 as partial success _and keeps the image_. Final status = 1 yields a restorable image; status 1 does not (archives excluded). I think we agree that stat 1 beats the heck out of stat 1. That said,

Re: [Veritas-bu] Alternate methods for catalog vackup - eg

2006-06-27 Thread bob944
[...] I'm in no doubt whatsover of the importance of a valid catalog backup. The reason for the issue is simple - there are 50-100+ jobs running at any time of day. There is never any inactivity for long enough to get the 80 gigs-worth of catalog data backed up via the normal method.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Disk-Based backups having empty final fragments

2006-06-22 Thread bob944
I'm running disk-storage-unit backups (not the disk-staging storage units) on a NB5.1MP3 Solaris 9 server. I've configured my storage units for a 2000MB fragment size. Occasionally, I run into backup images which exactly fill the fragments exactly and bpimagelist shows a final zero-sized

Re: [Veritas-bu] Disk-Based backups having empty finalfragments

2006-06-22 Thread bob944
shaking head Ed, Ed, Ed... /shaking head You need to quit dating yourself and give some credit to the programmers who tried to get it right while dealing with people like you who are telling them the wrong thing. 1GB, by SI standards, is 1000MB. Seriously, I was raised and trained in

Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas Certification NBU 5.1

2006-06-21 Thread bob944
Looking at seeing what exams are out there for NBU 5.1 - based in the UK, info seems a little vague. Does anyone happen to know what good training stuff is out there, or exam to take perhaps to obtain a certification?

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6, Windows, excluding files

2006-06-21 Thread bob944
- From: bob944 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 21 June 2006 10:39 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Cc: Wilkinson, Tim Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6, Windows, excluding files We are backing up some databases (SQL and SharePoint) and using agents to backup the actual

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows File Server NEW STREAM syntax

2006-06-20 Thread bob944
I have started migrating data over to a Win2k3 R2 file server and I am experiencing Error 41's (go figure) and so I wanted to breakout the different volumes into streams but I get and Error 69, that states invalid file specification (missing ':'): NEW_STREAM this is what I have in my

Re: [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup

2006-06-18 Thread bob944
Which run days did you have checked. The one for the start of the start windows, The end day of the start window or both. I checked 'em all--recurring days of week, Sun-Sat. Just looked at the test server, and it's done a calendar-based backup each night at the start of the 2300-2200

Re: [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup

2006-06-15 Thread bob944
Support had me stop Netbackup and remove the file and then start Netbackup. I was told it would recreate that pempersist file. It did recreate the file but did not help get my fulls to run. I was using nbpemreq -predict -date XX/XX/ XX:XX:XX with different dates and times to try and

Re: [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup

2006-06-13 Thread bob944
I have years of experience with frequency based scheduling but I have always shied away from calendar based. Today I made my first attempt and Gone over to the dark side, have you? I cannot see where I made a mistake. Please review this and help me if you can. Thanks. Here is the

[Veritas-bu] Can't believe I'm ranting about this...

2006-06-10 Thread bob944
Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 2, Issue 45 [not only quoting a whole digest, but a digest where a reply had quoted all of a _previous_ digest in it... sheesh!] Okay, some evil virus has gotten into the list, causing at least SIX people to quote the whole freakin' digest in their list

Re: [Veritas-bu] Drive Cleaning, your opinion

2006-06-07 Thread bob944
Does anyone knoew if the HP ESL322e has a facility to clean drives as I cannot get NetBackup to do it!! I have so far performed it manually, but I have never seen the drive ^^^ require a clean yet..! ^^ Then

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backups using all tapes in a jukebox

2006-06-07 Thread bob944
I'm sure I have a setting wrong somewhere, but one of my huge backups has decided that it wants to take over all 4 drives in our jukebox when it does full backups. I use streams but would really like to set it so the policy can use a maximum of 2 drives at any one time so other policies can

Re: [Veritas-bu] Drive Cleaning, your opinion

2006-06-07 Thread bob944
Im not cleaning it on a regular basis :-) only twice in 7 months now. But wondered if there was an easy automatic way. Trawled through the HP site, but could not find anything of relevance. Amen. I can never find useful stuff on IBM's or HP's sites, though I have found rich technical gems on

Re: [Veritas-bu] import requirements (was: 3 Quest...)

2006-06-07 Thread bob944
I just had an afterthought!! Lets ASSUME I remove the policies and volume pools? What if I have to do an IMPORT of 3 year old tapes?? What happens? You just import them, phase 1 (build metadata file) and 2 (build files file); the import depends on nothing. I'm piggybacking on Carlos'

Re: [Veritas-bu] Drive Cleaning, your opinion

2006-06-07 Thread bob944
Our library is an *intelligent library* and we handle all cleaning thru it on a time basis, not mounts. [...] This is _so_ not recommended. [1] able to determine the lowest usage point of all of our drives per library in each 24-hour cycle and for each day of the week. We then set up

Re: [Veritas-bu] import requirements (was: 3 Quest...)

2006-06-07 Thread bob944
Out of interest, do you know if this holds true for multiplexed tapes, i.e. can be read using tar? Not without preprocessing, AFAIK. The placement of the multiplex headers is described in the SAG, but not the layout. I figured out part of it a few years ago while working a different issue and

Re: [Veritas-bu] import requirements (was: 3 Quest...)

2006-06-07 Thread bob944
Bob Correct, in order to do any import, thte tape MUST be known by NetBackup, however if its expired, That betrays your mindset (not beating up on you, just pointing out that you're thinking in terms of your current system and 3-year-old tape scenario; I'm encouraging you to think

Re: [Veritas-bu] FROZEN vs SUSPENDED

2006-06-01 Thread bob944
Any opinions to the differences of a tape in FROZEN or SUSPENDED state? What questions do you have _after_ reading the descriptions under Media Lists Report, Media Summary Report and Media Server Properties in your System Administrator's Guide, Volume I, for starters?

Re: [Veritas-bu] Exclude lists

2006-05-24 Thread bob944
I have a problem that we have a policy for a filesystem which contains a large number of files with a differential backup and it fails with status 41 (network connection timed out) I tried first to increase the CLIENT_READ_TIMEOUT to 1800 and it worked for some time then failed again with

Re: [Veritas-bu] shared memory and BUFFERS with dssu's

2006-05-24 Thread bob944
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=33554432 set shmsys:shminfo_shmseg=100 33554432 * 100 = 3,355,443,200 = 3GB I have 32 GB physical memory available. I am getting error 89's and would like to make more shared memory available. I don't know why the system admin is only presenting 3GB? There are

Re: [Veritas-bu] compression to disk staging unit

2006-05-23 Thread bob944
B. Because of that, as I said earlier, no tape software ever made, AFAIK, makes such an assumption. [...] Then you are obviously not as old as me :-( Might be--cut my teeth on 200bpi, 7-track and rememeber 3-inch-wide tape. :-) Way back, ICL had something called FMS (Filestore

Re: [Veritas-bu] compression to disk staging unit

2006-05-23 Thread bob944
B. Because of that, as I said earlier, no tape software ever made, AFAIK, makes such an assumption. [...] Then you are obviously not as old as me :-( Might be--cut my teeth on 200bpi, 7-track and rememeber 3-inch-wide tape. :-) Way back, ICL had something called FMS (Filestore

Re: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

2006-05-22 Thread bob944
I used Frequency for years, I highly suggest Mastering the Calendar Based Scheduling, it is much better than Frequency scheduling I have found. It rocks. Specially if you have To each his own. Glad it's doing the job for you; my experience has been that it's useful when there's a need to

Re: [Veritas-bu] compression to disk staging unit

2006-05-20 Thread bob944
I think if you turn on software compression this only applies to the data in-flight, i.e. it is compressed by the client but decompressed by the server, regardless of the type of storage unit. ^^ What makes you say this? link. Even on a WAN many WAN routers use

Re: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type--let's get it right

2006-05-18 Thread bob944
frequency is measured from when the backup ends Many posters have made this statement; please state your sources as this is demonstrably false. Policy Name: DEMO-prod-std Include: / Schedule: full Frequency: every 1 hour Daily Windows: Thursday

RE: [Veritas-bu] Fwd: Frequency vs Calendar

2006-05-17 Thread bob944
In reference to 1 day - 24 hours, how does the Frequency option work compared to the Calendar option? Does Frequency start at Midnight to Midnight? Or can the start be set on the start time? Frequency means, um, frequency. Length of time from the last successful backup run of a given

RE: [Veritas-bu] Odd Win2k3 Client Problem

2006-05-14 Thread bob944
Now the policy is set for ALL LOCAL DRIVES for the client. [...] checked what Activity Monitor shows, and for some reason, it thinks the client has a U: Drive. Logged onto the client, and it doesnt! Yet, if I run the client in its other policy, it doesnt even see a U: Drive - Only in

RE: [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?

2006-05-13 Thread bob944
3) originator collects replies and posts resolution or further enquirers Laudable goal; not gonna happen. Hardly anyone who didn't learn in ARPANet or Usenet days has ever _seen_ reply-to-me-I'll-post-a-summary-to-the-list, or other responsible behaviors in a mailing list: trimming replies,

RE: [Veritas-bu] Datacenter 4.5 Question

2006-05-12 Thread bob944
I'm a little confused by the datacenter documentation in Veritas Support. It looks like the FP7 8 and 9 are not cumulative, and the documentation says you must install them on top of FP6, which is cumulative. My question, is that I need a bug fix present in 8, is 9 cumulative back to 7 or

RE: [Veritas-bu] cannot read media header

2006-05-10 Thread bob944
From: Tim Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] cannot read media header This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_=_NextPart_001_01C6745B.F06FD668 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding:

RE: [Veritas-bu] Re: Help! All Tapes From Scratch

2006-05-04 Thread bob944
I agree with your comments about throwing the tape away. However, can we assume this scenario: Full Backup Friday of critical Server. Completed all ok, but during the job a status appeared (Media Write Error, or Media Position Error) although only once. Sunday Server Dies Come in

[Veritas-bu] Re: Help! All Tapes From Scratch Gone - All jobs failed :(

2006-05-03 Thread bob944
I have had this happen to me on multiple occasions. I have had no good explanation for this NBU behavior from Symantec/VERITAS. My Jeez, how hard is it to key in frozen media at support.veritas.com? And the first one listed is... ta-da!... How to troubleshoot frozen media on Unix and Windows.

RE: [Veritas-bu] Disaster Recovery Software Planning for Win2k3

2006-04-29 Thread bob944
I wanted to use the collect disaster recovery info, but as I do not have a key, I cannot use it! [...] Once the Server is up, its a case of restoring the Data via NBU - which works. But I would like to review the possibility of a faster solution. Buy the BMR option. [...] With my old NBU

RE: [Veritas-bu] Media 86 - Position Error but job loaded new tape and ended status 0

2006-04-29 Thread bob944
27/04/2006 18:40:54 - positioning 0622L3 to file 87 27/04/2006 18:42:14 - Warning bptm(pid=3888) cannot locate on drive index 0, The request could not be performed because of an I/O device error. 27/04/2006 18:42:18 - Error bptm(pid=3888) ioctl (MTREW) failed on media id 0622L3, drive

RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.0 catalog size vs 5.1 catalog size

2006-04-29 Thread bob944
I asked a question similar to this, in regards to whether NBPUSHDATA needs more disk space, but I am still not entirely sure. The response Jim made indicated, that Netbackup leaves the current DB intact and perhaps creates a new DB - but surely this means more disk space. nbpushdata

RE:[Veritas-bu] Volume Pools [recommendations please]

2006-04-26 Thread bob944
Dave Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am surprised by the number of people using a single volume pool for data backups. What about mixed retentions on media? What about them? NetBackup *never* puts different retentions on a tape unless you force it to with the MULTIPLE_RETENTIONS_PER_MEDIA

RE: [Veritas-bu] backup of windows event logs

2006-04-21 Thread bob944
I have just discovered that the windows event logs are not backed up as part of a All_Local_Drives backup. We were hoping to recover an event log that was deleted and there are no backups of these logs in the directory that they are located in on a windows server. There is no mention of a

RE: [Veritas-bu] ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES

2006-04-21 Thread bob944
perhaps examine the output from: bppllist policy_in_question -U -L And, from the client, with logging set to 5 (bp.conf VERBOSE = 5) the /usr/openv/netbackup/logs/bpbkar and bpcd log files. It will give an indication of how it is choosing the paths to follow. We use the

RE: RE: [Veritas-bu] Hardware compression not working

2006-04-18 Thread bob944
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:42:58 -0400 From: Carlisle, D Renee [EMAIL PROTECTED] I checked all that and it looks good=2E Sg=2Econf is identical, major numb= ers and minor number convention on the HP looks the same (they don't exist = on sun) no mention of compression or errors in

RE: [Veritas-bu] Hardware compression not working

2006-04-18 Thread bob944
Tape Library: IBM 3584 partitioned into production and test environment Operating System: Solaris 9, Windows 2003, HP-UX 11i Netbackup: 5.1 mp3 Just upgraded from STK L700E LTO-1 library to a IBM 3584 LTO-2 library All of a sudden tape compression is not working on any flavor

RE: [Veritas-bu] Large Folder Backup Wildcards - Windows

2006-04-11 Thread bob944
I've read the official Veritas documentation on using wildcards to backup files on Windows and I want to know if anyone has come up with something better. Basically Veritas says for 4.5-5.1 list everything you want to backup, then exclude all of it, and then include using wildcards. To

RE: [Veritas-bu] upgrade to nbu 6.0

2006-04-11 Thread bob944
I am currently running NBU 3.4GB on solaris 8 and would like to upgrade to solaris 10 and NBU 6.0. Are their any documents on what files I need to save. Or As others have pointed out, you need to read the manuals. Get AT LEAST the Installation Guide for each step (support.veritas.com).

NetBackup manuals (was: RE: [Veritas-bu] Delete Data after backup)

2006-03-30 Thread bob944
Don't have the admin guides :-( I looked at the example, For everyone's info, all NetBackup manuals are on the installation media and downloadable from support.veritas.com: click NetBackup Products, NetBackup Enterprise Server click Compatibility Reference select Manuals Documentation,

<    1   2   3