Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610

2013-06-05 Thread pranav batra
are failing. Now this is something new to troubleshoot. PranavB To: pranav_vent...@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610 From: ken_zuf...@goodyear.com Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:35:26 -0400 How often are you running the backups? If TIR information has dropped off

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610

2013-06-04 Thread pranav batra
Hello Geeks, I am here facing issues with synthetic backup. There are 7-8 windows 2008 clients that are giving me issues with synthetic backup.The backup is failing with 610. 1: (610) end point terminated with an error Environment : Master windows 2008 R2 -7.5.0.5Client 7.5.0.5 -2008R2 We are

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610

2013-06-04 Thread ken_zufall
support. Ken Zufall Operating Systems Administrator The Goodyear Tire Rubber Company From: pranav batra pranav_vent...@hotmail.com To: Veritas veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: 06/04/2013 02:53 AM Subject:[Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610 Sent

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610

2013-06-04 Thread smpt1
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of ken_zuf...@goodyear.com Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:33 PM To: pranav_vent...@hotmail.com Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610 We had a similar

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610

2013-06-04 Thread ken_zufall
...@hotmail.com Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: 06/04/2013 10:15 AM Subject:RE: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610 But , I think that you can run differential incrementals and synthesize a cumulative backup. Then you can use the full and the latest synthetic

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610

2013-06-04 Thread pranav batra
We are only trying to synthesize full and differential. We are not taking cumulative and still backup is failing with 610. Thanks,PranavB To: sm...@peppas.gr CC: pranav_vent...@hotmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610 From

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-08 Thread W. Curtis Preston
: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Crowey Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 10:52 PM To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups cpreston wrote: And you're verifying that the original full does not need

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-08 Thread Jim H
There is a case open with Symantec about this issue, and I am told an EEB will be made available soon. You are not supposed to have to keep a full around, but once the full expires a new full is taken automagically. QuoteSo it appears I need to keep the Full backup around even though the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-08 Thread Jim Horalek
@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups There is a case open with Symantec about this issue, and I am told an EEB will be made available soon. You are not supposed to have to keep a full around, but once the full expires a new full is taken automagically. QuoteSo it appears I need

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-08 Thread bob944
There is a case open with Symantec about this issue, and I am told an EEB will be made available soon. You are not supposed to have to keep a full around, No. You _must_ have a full plus subsequent TIR and diffs or cincs to synthesize a new full, but it does not matter how the full was

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-08 Thread Jim Horalek
...@federaledge.com; jhilt...@excite.com Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups There is a case open with Symantec about this issue, and I am told an EEB will be made available soon. You are not supposed to have to keep a full around, No. You _must_ have a full plus subsequent TIR and diffs

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread tsimerson
Jim, I've been testing it myself. I think you do need to keep that full backup around. The synthetic part of a synthetic backup is the consolidation of the full backup and the incrementals into a single image. This is done via duplication. The test scenario I'm working with is the

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread cpreston
I've been testing it myself. I think you do need to keep that full backup around. The synthetic part of a synthetic backup is the consolidation of the full backup and the incrementals into a single image. This is done via duplication. What makes it synthetic is that it is created tape

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread Jim Horalek
] On Behalf Of cpreston Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:39 PM To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups I've been testing it myself. I think you do need to keep that full backup around. The synthetic part of a synthetic backup is the consolidation of the full

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread Dean
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups I've been testing it myself. I think you do need to keep that full backup around. The synthetic part of a synthetic backup is the consolidation of the full backup and the incrementals into a single image. This is done

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread A Darren Dunham
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:11:46AM +1000, Dean wrote: From what I've read, and from what Curtis says below, you DON'T need to keep the original full backup around, once you've created at least one more synethtic full backup. You can do just one full backup, then keep creating synthetic fulls

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread Dean
I see what you mean. But I suspect that's just a poorly worded paragraph. The diagram on page 200 of the Admin Guide (Vol 1, Windows version) indicates the original full is not required ongoing. I wish I could say for sure from experience, but I've never been able to get synthetic backups

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread Crowey
Gidday, I've been running synthetics for nearly two years now to backup about 3/3.5 TBs and have to say has generally run extremely well. Within the same policy I have 3 schedules. The first is an ad-hoc full - I used this to create the first full backup, and on the very few occasions when

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups Or May A Red Herring.

2009-07-07 Thread Jim Horalek (Federal Edge)
To: Jim Horalek Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups From what I've read, and from what Curtis says below, you DON'T need to keep the original full backup around, once you've created at least one more synethtic full backup. You can do just one full

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread W. Curtis Preston
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups Gidday, I've been running synthetics for nearly two years now to backup about 3/3.5 TBs and have to say has generally run extremely well. Within the same policy I have 3 schedules. The first is an ad-hoc full - I used this to create the first full backup

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread Crowey
cpreston wrote: And you're verifying that the original full does not need to be kept around? OK ... I missed two important points I guess. With a 1 month retention period, I always have 4 (weekly) synthetic backups in my library, and so yes I've never had any problem about recovering

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-06-25 Thread Jim Horalek
I have a bit of an oddity. I'm testing Synthetic Backups. I have Day 1 Full backup. Day 2 Incremental Day 3 Synthetic-Full Day 4 Incremental (and manually expire the Day 1 Full) Day 5 Full backup runs So it appears I need to keep the Full backup around even though the Synthetic Full