Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 1:14 PM
To: Ed Wilts; pranav batra
Cc: Veritas
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VSP versus VSS
May as well convert to VSS now. It is no longer there in 7.0. I swapped all my
2003 and 2008 clients and things have never work3ed better, no more status code
156 errors
.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of William Brown
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 5:59 AM
To: Veritas
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VSP versus VSS
I was reading that section of the 6.5.6 release notes and I just couldn't
] On Behalf Of Herbert.George
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 1:22 PM
To: William Brown; Veritas
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VSP versus VSS
If you have a windows machine handy, you could install the media server
software on it to get the VSP disable tool. You don't actually have to do
backups
Hello Geeks,
I have a small question on VSP/VSS.
As symantec recommends VSS for 2003 clients over VSP then why it is the
defauly snap-shot provider option ?
Any specific reason for this recommendation as i can't find any tech note
specifying why VSS:
They all just explain that VSS is for 2003
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:12 AM, pranav batra pranav_vent...@hotmail.comwrote:
I have a small question on VSP/VSS.
As symantec recommends VSS for 2003 clients over VSP then why it is the
defauly snap-shot provider option ?
It's historical and is no longer the default in NetBackup 7.0.
-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 11:49 AM
To: pranav batra
Cc: Veritas
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VSP versus VSS
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:12 AM, pranav batra
pranav_vent...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have a small question on VSP/VSS
Of Spencer
O'Donnell
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 1:14 PM
To: Ed Wilts; pranav batra
Cc: Veritas
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VSP versus VSS
May as well convert to VSS now. It is no longer there in 7.0. I swapped all my
2003 and 2008 clients and things have never work3ed better, no more status
