make sure
you make the cluster name the same as the name of the original standalone.
You definitely want to read the HA guide. What clustering software are
you using?
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Senior Recovery Administrator
Mylan
1000 Hampton Center
Morgantown, WV 26505
jack.fores...@my
MM DB with nbemmcmd
to update it with cluster information, but Symantec is probably the only
one who knows the incantation.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Senior Recovery Administrator
Mylan
1000 Hampton Center
Morgantown, WV 26505
jack.fores...@mylan.com
Phone: +1.304.554.6039
"spaldam"
Have you considered partitioning the library and treating it as two
separate libraries?
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Senior Recovery Administrator
Mylan
1000 Hampton Center
Morgantown, WV 26505
jack.fores...@mylan.com
Phone: +1.304.554.6039
anil.mau...@sanofi-aventis.com
Sent by: veritas
t these add-ons must be
at the same level as the client. Did anything change in 6.5 so that the
add-ons can be at a lower patch level than the client (6.5, 6.5.1, or
6.5.2 agent with a 6.5.3 client) or are we going to be stuck at a 6.5.2
client if we want to use the Oracle agent?
--
Jack Forest
guessing that even building a new cluster
from scratch and then doing a catalog recovery wouldn't work because of
this.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Senior Recovery Administrator
Global Technology Services - AHS
Mylan, Inc.
1000 Hampton Center
Morgantown, WV 26505
jack.fores...@myla
We have a case open with Symantec, but I thought I'd check here to see if
anyone else has run into this issue.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data Protection Administrator
Global Technology Services - AHS
Mylan, Inc.
5005 Greenbag Road
Morgantown, WV 26501
jack.fores...@mylan.com
Phone: +1.30
ormance.
I'm a UNIX administrator by trade, so troubleshooting Windows issues is a
bit foreign to me.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data Protection Administrator
Global Technology Services - AHS
Mylan, Inc.
5005 Greenbag Road
Morgantown, WV 26501
jack.fores...@mylan.com
Phone: +1.304.554.
When I'm doing my tests, I'm running the job only on a single client. I
noticed some high latencies on the guest using the built in tools when
running a test job yesterday, so I'm going to pursue your ideas further.
Thanks for your feedback!
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr.
is approx 930Km. The
initial seeding of the Puredisk server took about 9 days, but once that
finished, the weekly full backups, from start to all replication complete
takes under 12 hours. This is a NetBackup 7 environment.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data Protection Administrator
Global Technology
oughput. My overall impressions so far is that the
DataDomain is more enterprise oriented while PureDisk and NBU5000 aren't
quite at that point yet.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data Protection Administrator
Global Technology Services - AHS
Mylan, Inc.
5005 Greenbag Road
Morgantown, WV 26501
jack.
ual restore of a server with an EFI partition? My gut tells me that
the answer to that question is "no".
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data Protection Administrator
Global Technology Services - AHS
Mylan, Inc.
5005 Greenbag Road
Morgantown, WV 26501
jack.fores...@mylan.com
2) EXITING with status 84
<--
Other vitals:
NetBackup version: 7.1.0.2
OST Plugin: 2.3.1.0
DDOS: 5.0.0.7-226726
Anyone else have a similar problem?
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data Protection Administrator
Global Technology Services - AHS
Mylan, Inc.
5005 Greenbag Road
Morgantown, WV 2650
DataDomain has also recommended that we upgrade to DDOS 5.0.2.3 for the
exact same reason you cite. It's good to get confirmation from someone
that this could more or less resolve the problem. Thanks for everyone's
feedback...it is much appreciated!
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data
't require us
to buy new tapes when moving from the A to B series.
STK T1 - Bought some of these at a former employer, but left before
they could be installed. Heard they were great drives.
DLT/SDLT - Meh.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data Protection Administrator
Global Technology Servic
e are
10G ethernet front to back, and have a dedicated 10G VLAN for backup
traffic between the media servers and DataDomain and multiple connections
between them.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data Protection Administrator
Global Technology Services - AHS
Mylan, Inc.
5005 Greenbag Road
Morgantown, WV
We had a similar issue with Aptare and vmware backups. For all vmware
backups, NetBackup was reporting the name of the ESX server as the client
name, and not the name of the VM itself. We kept pressing Symantec, and
they relented and fixed it.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data Protection
for
the restore based on physical proximity.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data Protection Administrator
Global Technology Services - AHS
Mylan, Inc.
5005 Greenbag Road
Morgantown, WV 26501
jack.fores...@mylan.com
Phone: +1.304.554.6039
Cell:
pools like DataDomain.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data Protection Administrator
Global Technology Services - AHS
Mylan, Inc.
5005 Greenbag Road
Morgantown, WV 26501
jack.fores...@mylan.com
Phone: +1.304.554.6039
Cell: +1.412.805.5313
t the bill nicely.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data Protection Administrator
Global Technology Services - AHS
Mylan, Inc.
5005 Greenbag Road
Morgantown, WV 26501
jack.fores...@mylan.com
Phone: +1.304.554.6039
Cell: +1.412.805
get for
opt-dup from a remote site plus client-side dedupe backups from the local
site. No real problems except for the time one of the security
certificates expired and wasn't automatically regenerated.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Senior Data Protection Analyst
Symantec Certified Specialist - Ne
I'll throw in another vote for Aptare
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Senior Data Protection Analyst
Symantec Certified Specialist - NetBackup 7.0 for UNIX Administration
Global Technology Services
Mylan
781 Chestnut Ridge Road
Morgantown, WV 26505
(Embedded image moved to file: pic27051.jpg)
else seeing this behavior? Did 1.4.2 fix it? I'd prefer to wait
until 1.4.3 or 1.4.4 to update due to our onerous change process, but who
knows when they're going to be released. I'm going to reach out to
Symantec support too.
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Senior Data Protection Analys
tent binding so that the device assignments don't change if the
server is rebooted?
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Senior Data Protection Analyst
Symantec Certified Specialist - NetBackup 7.0 for UNIX Administration
Global Technology Services
Mylan
781 Chestnut Ridge Road
Morgantown, WV 26505
(Embedded
We do patches on our Solaris master servers on a semi-annual basis. We
also take advantage of the fact that both our test and production
environments are clustered to minimize the chances that a bad patch will
hose the environment. We use a rolling upgrade method. First, we apply
patches to
Some drives can have the compression turned on by a drive setting so
that it uses compression, regardless. Did any of your drive settings
change?
I agree with a previous poster in that you should do some kind of a test
to determine how much data is being written to a tape before it moves on
An SSO license allows multiple media servers to share drives, like in a
SAN environment. To have a media server backup clients other than
itself, you need a full media server license.
Jeff Lightner wrote:
As I understand it the SAN Media Server license is only to allow a
server on the SAN to
DB corruption with 5.1 MP5? I must be living in a shell as I hadn't
heard about that. We're getting ready to install MP5 in a couple of
weeks. Can you elaborate?
Dmitri Smirnov wrote:
Still working on this one ... Overall impression - not worth it - too
many changes, too many bugs, documen
I've used (from memory) something like
vmglob -delete -devhost
This removed everything from the global device database for that media
server...robotic defs as well as drives.
Paul Keating wrote:
>Yeah, that's what I'd been trying to do, but after trying to delete the
>device it would not dele
Something else to bear in mind: Unless things have changed recently,
and I have an email from Veritas to support this, SSO licenses are
licensed per drive. If you have 5 drives that you are sharing, you need
5 SSO licenses.
If this is not, in fact, the case, I'll need to find new Veritas rep
re is, however, a per drive SHARED DRIVE license.
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack
>Forester, Jr.
>Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:16 PM
>To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>Subject: Re: [Veritas-
I'm trying to decide whether to go with MP5, but after reading about one
person's possible catalog corruption after installing it, I'm a little
leery. Has anyone else experienced any problems after Installing MP5,
or is this catalog corruption thing likely an isolated incident? I know
to do a
Bobby,
I'm running clustered master servers just as you describe, and according
to our Symantec rep, you do not need SSO licenses for your clustered
master servers. However, if those same drives are shared with other
media servers, then the answer becomes "yes, you do need SSO licenses".
Clus
We've got a bunch of 9940B drives and use 262144 for SIZE_DATA BUFFERS.
Performance is very good. When we eval'd the drives a couple of years
ago, I saw peak performance of 65MB/sec on really compressible data.
Our numbers vary widely depending on the nature of the data being backed
up. Fro
This isn't something I've seen discussed here in recent memory, but it's
something we're working on right now. The new Daylight Saving Time
rules for the US take effect this year and we're wondering if anybody
has investigated the impact to NetBackup. We've been testing our OS
patches and the
on those
>mission critical servers.
>
>-- M
>
>
>
>
>"Jeff Lightner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>01/10/2007 12:44 PM
>
>To
>"Jack Forester, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Veritas List"
>
>cc
>
>S
mentioned Java.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack
>Forester, Jr.
>Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 2:03 PM
>To: Veritas List
>Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup and New Daylight Saving Time Rules
>
>I gue
I'll also add that the upgrade from 4.5 to 5.1 - especially if your
master server is clustered - is not a simple, straightforward upgrade,
either. But the upgrade to 6.0 sounds like it will be more
challenging. We're preparing for a 5.1 -> 6.0 upgrade here.
Justin Piszcz wrote:
>I would read
We've been running 9940B drives for nearly 3 years now, and I've never
heard of a table of addresses to control access to the drive. I've been
through the menus on the drive and looked through the drive manual and
never saw a reference to such a "feature". Are you having a problem at
this mom
Greetings...
We're starting to experience a large number of backup jobs ending with a
status code of 50. Every now and then I used to see backups end with a
50, but it was usually due to someone rebooting a media server in the
middle of a backup. The ones I'm seeing I can confirm that the ser
39 matches
Mail list logo
