Hello,
Has anyone here had performance problems with 6.5 masters running on
Solaris with T5220 or T2 Sparc class processors? I have noticed that
during periods of heavy job load the nbrb evaluation cycle, which
appears to handled via a single threaded dbsrv9 process, can take
forever and leave job
William,
Thank you for the response.
I think staggering jobs is really my only option in the short-term,
which I've already done to a large extent. Due to a strict 'non-business
hours' window, which is ~7500 jobs a night and growing, I'm trying to
defuse a ticking time-bomb.
The T5220's have b
Look at increasing the "delay on multiplexed restores" on the media server and
also increasing the number of channels being allocated in the rman restore
script.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Reynolds, Susan
K.
Also, depending on the Oracle version and configuration you can mount an ASM
volume as a filesystem using ACFS:
http://ocpdba.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/putting-acfs-to-work-how-to-create-a-mount-point-in-the-new-oracle-file-system/
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng
It should have been multithreaded from the start, they are about 3 years late.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 12:07 PM
To: gstaff...@barclaycardus.com;
Anybody running a clustered 6.5.x or 7.0 master on Windows 2003 or 2008 with
MSCS?
Looking at this option for a new 10,000+ job per night master.
Any comments are appreciated.
This message is private and confidential. If you have received it in error,
please no
As long as you have autobackup enabled, you shouldn't need the rman repository.
If netbackup has the images in the catalog, restore the control file from
autobackup, which has the rman pieces info and will poll netbackup for the
images associated with them.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.
Are you at patch v6.5.6? Symantec also released a x64 image already at 6.5.4,
and suggests you install from this if you are using 2008.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of skylane
Sent: Wednesd
Anybody using a good way to dump the VDR images to tape (netbackup) for long
term retention?
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Praveen Gupta
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:10 AM
To: VER
Which hardware vendor(s) is exhibiting the issue?
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Chapman, Scott
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 1:03 PM
To: 'Preston, Douglas'; 'Veritas'
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 system state b
10 matches
Mail list logo
