The only OST difference that I recall is that with OST you don' need the
mount.
As I didn't have multiple media servers, I cannot attest to the effect
of that.
Cheers, Wayne
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Lightner, Jeff
wrote
, in part
:
> Thanks for that info.
>
> Just to clarify tho
d so it may
be different in an OST setup.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of tsimerson
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 9:02 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] HP Da
One thing to keep in mind with the major difference between a NetBackup
appliance and a dedupe storage appliance (Data Domain, DXi, Exagrid, etc.): a
NetBackup appliance is a media server that can do dedupe storage but the other
appliances require a media server in front of it.
When all is sai
their shouldn’t be a
requirement to use their hardware as well.
From: Scott Jacobson [mailto:scott.jacob...@microfocus.com]
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 4:49 PM
To: Joe Liston; Lightner, Jeff
Cc: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] HP Data Protector vs Veritas Net Backup
bably investigate DD as I really never
> saw any issues on the ones we had.
>
> As an FYI our eval of the Exagrid solution went quite well and management
> has opted to go that route to replace the DXi and the Data Domain.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: veritas-b
nt: Monday, December 21, 2015 2:53 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] HP Data Protector vs Veritas Net Backup
Jeff,
Could you provide specifics re: what you did not like about the NetBackup
dedupe appliance?
Thanks again, greatly appreciate your insight on this top
Jeff,
Could you provide specifics re: what you did not like about the NetBackup
dedupe appliance?
Thanks again, greatly appreciate your insight on this topic.
+--
|This was sent by hankv...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forwar
Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2015 9:52 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] HP Data Protector vs Veritas Net Backup
What's the primary purpose of replicating data off-site? DR or long term
retention? If it's latter, then you would try CloudBoost, whic
What's the primary purpose of replicating data off-site? DR or long term
retention? If it's latter, then you would try CloudBoost, which is fully
integrated with Avamar/NW/NBU today. It allows backup data to be sent to
public/private service providers.
And next year, DD will have a feature called C
You can explore on NetBackup 5230 appliance.
They are pretty good in Backup/Tape and Optimized replication.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 11:09 AM, tech472
wrote:
> Yes you're right, we're researching all options one being to replicate our
> existing DD units to a cloud provider. We're kind of stuck w
Yes you're right, we're researching all options one being to replicate our
existing DD units to a cloud provider. We're kind of stuck with them based on
their original cost and the fact that they don't talk to other storage units,
though purchasing another DD just costs too much. Actifio sounds
t: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 3:52 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] HP Data Protector vs Veritas Net Backup
Our two EMC Data Domain 640 repositories, one which we keep in our offsite CoLo
facility and the other in our main office, have maxed out their capacity soone
Our two EMC Data Domain 640 repositories, one which we keep in our offsite CoLo
facility and the other in our main office, have maxed out their capacity sooner
than we had planned. Along with the DDs we use Avamar nodes to backup our VMs
with Direct Drive Mappings (SQL clusters) and a few physi
13 matches
Mail list logo
