Yeah, that was my question.
I have made some progression. I unzoned the drives, dropped them from every
media server, rebooted, and slowly reconfigured -everything-
I currently have 6 of 9 drives spinning. 1 is blinking amber, so something
wrong with it. But my two new drives we recently got a
Hello,
even we have no experience in NBU7, I think the behavior is similar as in NBU
6.5 - the thing is the FC-ID. In this FC-ID the Domain-ID of the Switch is
encoded, so the change you made resulted in different FC-IDs.
On an AIX System those IDs are used. It was possible to delete the drives
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:56:37PM -0400, Brandon35 wrote:
>
> A Darren Dunham,
>
> My environment looks like this:
[snip]
I can't help you specifically, I just think about things like this:
Netbackup DB (tpconfig/vmoprcmd)
generic scsi ("scan")
OS presentation (MS device manager, Linux tape de
A Darren Dunham,
My environment looks like this:
Master1 Solaris
Media1 Linux
Media2 Windows
Media3 Windows
Media4 Windows
Media5 Windows
Running tape -scan on each shows:
Master1 : 0, but the netbackup gui finds 7...
Media1: 9, gui finds 9 as well
Media2: 9, gui says unable to retreive device
rn.edu] On Behalf Of Brandon35
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 4:42 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives
Thanks for the info Judy,
Netbackup actually does not report any -1,-1,-1
I had only seen this in one of the Windows
Thanks for the info Judy,
Netbackup actually does not report any -1,-1,-1
I had only seen this in one of the Windows tape drive driver installers. One of
my windows machines that is only seeing 5 of the 9 drives showed the first 5
drives with normal bus, location, id numbers. but the last 4 dr
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:22:48PM -0400, Brandon35 wrote:
>
> I tried this on my solaris box, all I get is
>
> *
> ** SDT_TAPE *
> *
>
> and nothing...
So it's not currently detecting tape drives on the scsi-compatible
busses. I imagine if you t
@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives
I tried this on my solaris box, all I get is
*
** SDT_TAPE *
*
and nothing...
Is there anyway to get this same information on a windows box?
What if i&#
ng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Brandon35
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 4:23 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives
I tried this on my solaris box, all I get is
*
**
I tried this on my solaris box, all I get is
*
** SDT_TAPE *
*
and nothing...
Is there anyway to get this same information on a windows box?
What if i'm getting -1, -1, -1 ??
+
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 04:24:59PM -0400, Brandon35 wrote:
>
> Im having tape drives show up with the same BUS address...
>
> Drive 1 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 1, LUN 0
> Drive 2 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 2, LUN 0
> Drive 3 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 3, LUN 0
> Drive 4 Loca
I meant duplicate Targed ID, not bus. Sorry
+--
|This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--
Drive 1 through 5 is on Switch A
Drive 6 through 9 is on Switch B
So that could be why the Location addresses are duplicating. Would that cause a
problem though?
+--
|This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Centr
: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives
Im having tape drives show up with the same BUS address...
Drive 1 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 1, LUN 0
Drive 2 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 2, LUN 0
Drive 3 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 3, LUN 0
Drive 4 Location: Bus
Im having tape drives show up with the same BUS address...
Drive 1 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 1, LUN 0
Drive 2 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 2, LUN 0
Drive 3 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 3, LUN 0
Drive 4 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 4, LUN 0
Drive 5 Location: Bus Number 0, Ta
Martin, Jonathan: I tried http://support.microsoft.com/kb/315539 to view
possible hidden tape drives due to path change. They did not appear.
pharrold: While that is a very useful command in situations where it's needed,
wouldnt deleting all the drives and rescanning for them via Netbackup's
C
randon35
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 10:04 PM
> To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> In one of my environments we replaced our old SAN switch with a new Cisco. We
> went from 1 f
bject: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives
Hi everyone,
In one of my environments we replaced our old SAN switch with a new Cisco. We
went from 1 fabric on the old switch to 2 fabrics on the new Cisco switch.
We split up the tape drives 1, 2, 3, 4 on Fabric A. 5,6,7,8
o clean up once you know what EMM is thinking:
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/271366.htm
- Original Message -
From: "Brandon35"
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 10:03:53 PM
Subject: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7
Have you tried cold booting the servers ?
-Shyam
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Brandon35 <
netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> In one of my environments we replaced our old SAN switch with a new Cisco.
> We went from 1 fabric on the old switch to 2 fabrics on the ne
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Brandon35
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 11:04 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives
Hi everyone,
In one of my environments we replaced our old SAN switch with a new Cisco. We
went from 1 fabric on the old switch to 2 fabrics on the new Cisco switch.
We split up the tape drives 1, 2, 3, 4 on Fabric A. 5,6,7,8,9 on Fabric B.
After this switch, our media servers are having enorm
22 matches
Mail list logo
