On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 08:22:24PM -0400, John Cronin wrote:
On 6/30/08, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 03:42:40PM -0300, Rodolfo Bonnin wrote:
Hi all,
We're implementing a new cluster in zoned Sun equipment, using the
mentioned
2006 paper
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:46:41AM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 08:22:24PM -0400, John Cronin wrote:
On 6/30/08, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 03:42:40PM -0300, Rodolfo Bonnin wrote:
Hi all,
We're implementing a new
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 09:35:29AM -0400, John Cronin wrote:
It is the last part of your post that I have found causes the most problems
in my experience: the need to propagate changes to all affected zones, in
order to keep them identical.
Check. It does require rigour. On the other hand,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 03:42:40PM -0300, Rodolfo Bonnin wrote:
Hi all,
We're implementing a new cluster in zoned Sun equipment, using the mentioned
2006
paperhttp://eval.symantec.com/mktginfo/enterprise/white_papers/ent-whitepaper_implementing_solaris_zones_06-2007.en-us.pdf,
and I'd like
Just curious - are you using sparse root or full root zones?
On 6/30/08, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 03:42:40PM -0300, Rodolfo Bonnin wrote:
Hi all,
We're implementing a new cluster in zoned Sun equipment, using the
mentioned
2006 paper
, 2008 2:43 PM
To: Veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha] Implementing Solaris(tm) Zones with VCS, any
update?
Hi all,
We're implementing a new cluster in zoned Sun equipment, using the
mentioned 2006 paper
http://eval.symantec.com/mktginfo/enterprise/white_papers/ent-whitepape