Re: [Veritas-ha] wac question and suggestion
Having taught Global Clustering and its predecessor, I would prefer to see WAC have the ability to failover from one IP to another or make multiple connections over 2 or 3 IPs for higher redundancy. Keep in mind that DR is not HA If the WAC loses the connection, you would get notification and can fix the problem or online SGs at the remote site as appropriate. From: veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Pavel A Tsvetkov Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 9:56 AM To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-ha] wac question and suggestion Hello all! Only WAC now ensures communication between clusters. But it is not always good. If WAC is broken it is still possible to use heartbeats (through SRDF ping or steward) but there is no other ways of starting service groups on remote cluster. I don't mean Auto failover option between clusters which is not recommended by Symantec, If steward could handle service group information between clusters . It could be really a useful thing! Kind regards, Pavel Tsvetkov ___ Veritas-ha maillist - Veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-ha
Re: [Veritas-ha] wac question and suggestion
failover from IP to IP is a good thing, agree with you. But if we could use steward as a mediator and an arbitrator for cluster service groups it might give you more possibilities for auto failover in CONNECTED mode Gene Henriksen gene_henrik...@symantec.com написано 14.05.2009 15:33:28: Having taught Global Clustering and its predecessor, I would prefer to see WAC have the ability to failover from one IP to another or make multiple connections over 2 or 3 IPs for higher redundancy. Keep in mind that DR is not HA If the WAC loses the connection, you would get notification and can fix the problem or online SGs at the remote site as appropriate. From: veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-ha- boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Pavel A Tsvetkov Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 9:56 AM To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-ha] wac question and suggestion Hello all! Only WAC now ensures communication between clusters. But it is not always good. If WAC is broken it is still possible to use heartbeats (through SRDF ping or steward) but there is no other ways of starting service groups on remote cluster. I don't mean Auto failover option between clusters which is not recommended by Symantec, If steward could handle service group information between clusters . It could be really a useful thing! Kind regards, Pavel Tsvetkov ___ Veritas-ha maillist - Veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-ha
[Veritas-ha] wac question and suggestion
Hello all! Only WAC now ensures communication between clusters. But it is not always good. If WAC is broken it is still possible to use heartbeats (through SRDF ping or steward) but there is no other ways of starting service groups on remote cluster. I don't mean Auto failover option between clusters which is not recommended by Symantec, If steward could handle service group information between clusters . It could be really a useful thing! Kind regards, Pavel Tsvetkov ___ Veritas-ha maillist - Veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-ha