minimum downtime with application
services.
Thanks in advance
upendra
--
upen,
emerge -uD life (Upgrade Life with dependencies)
___
Veritas-ha maillist - Veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-ha
rey Dmitriev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is not really a veritas-ha question
>
> >log.file
>
> Truncates the file.
>
> -andrey
>
> -Original Message-
> From: upen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 3:09 PM
>
I cannot help you there.
>
>
> Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: upen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 12:21 PM US Mountain Standard Time
> To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn
can i use something like this in blackboard /apache config file ?
CustomLog "|/usr/local/apache/bin/rotatelogs /var/log/access_log 86400" common
-- Forwarded message ------
From: upen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sep 5, 2007 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] regardin
;t know what is 86400 here ?
> > CustomLog "|/usr/local/apache/bin/rotatelogs /var/log/access_log 86400"
> > common
On 9/6/07, Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 03:48:10PM -0500, upen wrote:
> > can i use something like this i
VCS, so please help with complete commands.
Thanks in advance.
-
upen,
emerge -uD life (Upgrade Life with dependencies)
___
Veritas-ha maillist - Veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-ha
ROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *upen
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:45 AM
> *To:* veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> *Subject:* [Veritas-ha] change cluster node
>
> Hi,
>
> Following is the result of hastatus -summary.
>
> I want to mak
if any more details are required to help..
Thanks in advance
--
upen,
emerge -uD life (Upgrade Life with dependencies)
___
Veritas-ha maillist - Veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-ha
cluster have been patched.
>
>
>
> Eric
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *upen
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 06, 2007 4:03 PM
> *To:* veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> *Subject:* [Veritas-ha] best way for patching of c
2007 5:04 AM, Eric Hennessey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Upen,
>
>
>
> My guess is you spoke with Sun sales when you asked this question. Try
> rephrasing your question to your Sun contact. Ask him/her if they will
> support a collection of systems running Sola
service group offline to take this resource offline.
What would be the safest way for oracle to be taken offline so that
there is no corruption...
Thank you,
--
upen,
emerge -uD life (Upgrade Life with dependencies)
___
Veritas-ha maillist - Veritas-ha
m Senicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Offline the service group. That will take storage offline as well
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: upen [mailto:[EMAIL
s going to have maintenance done to it, you're more than
> > likely going to want to take the storage offline, which will likely
> > impact the web server as well, anyway, assuming its storage is also on
> > the SAN. Best to take the whole service group offline as Jim said.
group would failover to other server2 I
freeze the SG on sever1.
I wonder what would have happened if I did not have frozen the SG on
server1 would it continue showing PARTIAL and will not failover ?
Thanks
> On Jan 13, 2008 8:57 AM, upen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sigmund
Hi Munish and all :
Thanks for responses . so may be I do not know when a SG faults... :))
Anyways thanks
Upen
On Jan 14, 2008 3:53 AM, Munish Dhawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Upen,
>
> As per my understanding ,you have already answered your query.
>
>
>
Jan 18 23:32:39 server1 genunix: [ID 451854 kern.notice] NOTICE: ce1: xcvr
addr:0x01 - link up 1000 Mbps full duplex
Jan 18 23:32:42 server1 llt: [ID 465730 kern.notice] LLT:10024: link 2 (ce1)
node 1 active
What could be the issue ?
--
upen,
emerge -uD life (Upgrade Life with dependencies
o offline but is not yet
> offline
>
>
>
> What about VCS logs?
>
>
>
> Is the service available?
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Sigi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *upen
> *Sent:* Sams
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *upen
> *Sent:* 19 January 2008 08:32
> *To:* Sigmund Brandstaetter
> *Cc:* veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-ha] http down on cluster
;
> But first you should check if the disks are actually available
>
>
>
> Nothing about the disks in the messages files? no that's it what I sent
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* upen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Samstag, 19. Jänner 2008 09:32
> *To:* Sigmun
;
>
>
> I hope I could help you a bit today ;)
>
>
>
> Good luck with the applications now :D
>
>
>
> *From:* upen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Samstag, 19. Jänner 2008 09:32
> *To:* Sigmund Brandstaetter
> *Cc:* veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.e
node where Memory module will be replaced.
5. once system is booted then hastart on both nodes
6. unfreeze the SGs running on other node.
Is this procedure correct, please advise
Thanks
--
upen,
emerge -uD life (Upgrade Life with dependencies)
___
Veritas
Hi guys,
my work place is deciding on which product to go for Veritas/Symantec
or Sun for clustering 2 nodes - ha on solaris.
I would like to know experience of people on using these products.
Which one is preferred in market and why and which one would be
considered better.
The environment we w
Hi ,
VCS version is 3.5 and OS is solaris 9
just a basic question, I am going to do following command on one of
the cluster nodes to switch application service group to other node.
Application SG includes resources like SAN disks, http, tomcat, oracle
listener/DB
# hagrp -switch service_group -
t;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: upen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 05:23 PM US Mountain Standard Time
> To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject:[Veritas-ha] hagrp -switch
>
> Hi ,
>
> VCS version is 3.5
Hi All,
running vs 3.5 on 2 solaris 9 servers. It is active passive.
I have 4 SAN partitions used by application on active node.
I found when I tried to run following command ( on system2)
hagrp - switch bb -to
Application did not switch to second node. While the status was is
following, I wo
This is the correct hastatus -sum.
- -- Group System Probed AutoDisabled
State
B ClusterService system1 Y N
OFFLINE
B ClusterService system2 Y N
ONLINE
B bb system1 Y N
STOPPING|PARTIAL
B bb
Thanks Bryan,
I am uploading the log file here , Please please look at it ...
http://pastebin.ca/1340266
the log file starts where I switch bb to system2.
Later when it is stuck, I hastop -force -all and hastart again on system1
and then bb is online on system1 ...
I wonder what went wrong.
P
egarding monitors previously in the logs? In
> years past, I've had a hung monitor agent keep a volume open and therefor
> not let it offline, but that was way back, probably in the 2.x versions of
> vxvm.
>
> Rich
>
>
> On Feb 17, 2009, at 2:09 PM, upen wrote:
>
&
28 matches
Mail list logo
