Hi John,
In general, the best practice when it comes to name persistency depends
on the namingscheme you are using. If you use EBN (Enclosure Based
Naming), then it is typically recommended to have persistency on. If you
use OSN (OS Based Naming) on the other hand, you're better off turning
Sengor, Ajay,
There's an updated version of the DMP whitepaper (covering the latest 5.0
enhancements) at:
http://eval.symantec.com/mktginfo/enterprise/white_papers/ent-whitepaper_vsf_5.0_dynamic_multi-pathing_05-2007.en-us.pdf
As far as load balancing is concerned, DMP has historically
While you could do a root mirror break-off, I'd rather use Live Upgrade
with Solaris. That way you build up the new boot environment and then
boot onto it. If you want to patch, you use LU and the same OS level on
both sides. Then you patch the inactive boot environment from the active
BE, then
On Nov 1, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Myers, Mike wrote:
I'm sure LU is always changing, but last I worked with it LU
understood encapsulation enough to undo it, but not redo it (no
great surprise there) so your new BE would be just on the disk
slices and you'd have to run a reencapsulation step
