Re: [Veritas-vx] cluster performance

2006-08-18 Thread Scott Kaiser
If it is the same file - Versions 4.0 and higher handoff regions of a file to different hosts to reduce lock contention. Depends on the file size and whether the hosts are accessing the same region of the file as to whether this would help (also depends what version you're running - if 4, you've

Re: [Veritas-vx] how retrive intent log size in cfs

2006-09-15 Thread Scott Kaiser
also use fsadm to change the log size. From the manpage -o specific_options Specifies VxFS-specific options. largefiles Sets the largefiles flag for the file system. When this flag is set, large files (greater than two gigabytes) can be created on the

Re: [Veritas-vx] Recommended mount options for VxFS

2006-11-15 Thread Scott Kaiser
You can also grow the log using fsadm, if you don't want to place it on a separate device and it was built too small originally. Man fsadm_vxfs for the specific flag. Regards, Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Par Botes Sent:

Re: [Veritas-vx] Licenses expired, can't boot system

2007-03-06 Thread Scott Kaiser
It may also depend on the version. What version are you running? Regards, Scott _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nath Pankaj-a22823 Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 10:57 PM To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject:

Re: [Veritas-vx] HELP: cannot grow vfxs

2007-04-09 Thread Scott Kaiser
Leon, What VxFS version and block size and disklayout do you have? For multi-TB file systems, you generally need some combination of: Larger block sizes Newer Binaries Newer disklayouts Regards, Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: [Veritas-vx] Minimum 5.0 install

2007-04-12 Thread Scott Kaiser
This is not going to be an official or comprehensive post, so caveat reador... In addition to VRTSvxvm, vxfs, and vlic, there are a number of other packages that are not GUI nor SFMS related, but you may find useful. I don't have a comprehensive list, but here are some examples (skipping the VRTS

Re: [Veritas-vx] Maximum Filesystem and File sizes?

2007-04-26 Thread Scott Kaiser
Max file system sizes on Solaris: 3.0.2 - almost certainly 1TB 3.5 - 32TB 4.x - 256TB The 3.5 and 4.x size limits assume an 8k block size. For each block size smaller (4k, 2k, 1k) knock down the max file system size by a power of 2. You'll need to be on the highest disklayout version to get the

Re: [Veritas-vx] Mirroring storage

2007-06-22 Thread Scott Kaiser
Also, if your mirror is 'semi-local' - in another building, or even several miles away, _and_ you have FC run between the two locations, you can set up a stretch cluster via VxVM mirroring. Regards, Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [Veritas-vx] Reg: CFS Primary/secondary on Master

2007-07-19 Thread Scott Kaiser
Also note that if using CFS 5.0 disklayout 7 (the default for a new file system), selecting the CFS primary is essentially irrelevent, as all cluster nodes participate in metadata transactions. The CLI to select is kept primarily for backward compatability. Scott -Original Message-

Re: [Veritas-vx] Vxfs space missing on new volumes

2007-08-14 Thread Scott Kaiser
Some of that reported unusable is actually usable. VxFS doesn't make many inodes in advance, it allocates creates them as-needed. UFS, by contrast, creates inodes at a fixed ratio to storage, and the space those inodes consume truly is unusable. But, if VxFS reports that space as free, then as

Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 3.2 is incompatible on Solaris 10

2007-08-14 Thread Scott Kaiser
Yes, you need to be on version 4.1 or 5.0 of VxVM for Solaris 10 support. From a license perspective, as long as you have current maintenance contract for that box, you are entitled to an upgrade. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: [Veritas-vx] does fsadm defragmentation require additional storageto run?

2007-09-07 Thread Scott Kaiser
Couple of comments -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Svoboda, Michael Steven Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 9:03 AM To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-vx] does fsadm defragmentation require additional

Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 4.1, vxconfigd issue

2007-10-29 Thread Scott Kaiser
1000 isn't a particularly large number of LUNs, even for 4.1 (although 5.0 will handle such configurations much better and faster). Can you open a support case for this? Regards, Scott From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ashish

Re: [Veritas-vx] Remove rootmirror disk to patch solaris os ?

2007-11-02 Thread Scott Kaiser
I understand that Veritas provides supporting utilities for use with LU, I haven't used them personally. I haven't seen that. the commands are: vxlustart vxlufinish Regards, Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A Darren Dunham

Re: [Veritas-vx] Where are the files ?

2007-11-13 Thread Scott Kaiser
Two options: 1. use a command from the database edition that provides this sort of mapping: vxstorage_stats Although this command was targeted at the database market, it works on any file. The requirements and such are in chapter ~8 of the DBED Administrator's Guide. Man page below. Note that,

Re: [Veritas-vx] Moving volumes of different disk group from one serverto another ***Newbie question***

2007-11-21 Thread Scott Kaiser
Is this the same operating system or different? The LUNs need to be visible from the other server (could be a physical connectivity or zoning issue, or if you have an older OS they sometimes need some 'prodding'), and the mount points should be created via mkdir before you migrate (no sense in

Re: [Veritas-vx] [Veritas-ha] EOS for Veritas

2008-01-25 Thread Scott Kaiser
In theory you can check it here: http://www.symantec.com/business/support/release_details.jsp?pid=15107 just pull down the version and platform. However, when I do that for Solaris 4.1, the answer seems to be somewhat misleading. Full support for sev 34 on 4.1 Solaris SPARC ended December

Re: [Veritas-vx] vxfs filesystem full - can not expand.

2008-03-17 Thread Scott Kaiser
Inodes are dynamically allocated in VxFS, so that's not likely to be the cause (unless you have a multiple billion inodes or a very, very old disk layout). Enhancements were a couple versions ago to reserve space internally within the file system so users wouldn't have to manually reserve free

Re: [Veritas-vx] Q About Sun StoreEdge 3320

2008-04-29 Thread Scott Kaiser
There were no ASLs in VxVM 3.2. ASLs weren't introduced until VxVM 4.0, two releases later. Regards, Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Liong Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 6:44 PM To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject:

Re: [Veritas-vx] sfua_db_config script

2008-05-13 Thread Scott Kaiser
Here was some response from a developer If you do not have volumes/FS ready, you can re-run sfua_db_config later after you create volume/FS. Regards, Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prasad Chalikonda Sent: Thursday, May 08,

Re: [Veritas-vx] storage checkpoint - recommended ways to dump to tape

2008-05-15 Thread Scott Kaiser
Also NetBackup. Regards, Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:19 AM To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-vx] storage checkpoint - recommended ways to dump to tape

Re: [Veritas-vx] SFORA + checkpoints

2008-06-04 Thread Scott Kaiser
Hi, Here is a suggestion -- -- Apparently DBAs access to /opt/VRTSdbed was at installation time. See the snippet from the Installation Guide below. -- Setting Administrative Permissions The VxDBA utility

Re: [Veritas-vx] Usage of snapshot and checkpoint.

2008-07-25 Thread Scott Kaiser
Three other points -- 1. Checkpoints use the free space within the file system. Snapshots need a dedicated, separate disk/LUN 2. Checkpoints have several optimized code paths, so their overhead is lower than that of Snapshots. 3. Snapshots provide a raw device view of the file system (checkpoints

Re: [Veritas-vx] Not able to resize the Volume

2008-08-11 Thread Scott Kaiser
In addition to snapshot, errno 16 can be caused if the fullfsck flag is set. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Francis, Aju Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 4:55 AM To: Praveent T M; veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re:

Re: [Veritas-vx] Veritas flag meanings?

2008-08-13 Thread Scott Kaiser
Hi Mike, Interesting question, I had to check with development. Here's the info: #define VX_SINGLEDEV0x4000 /* only one dev for fs */ In 4.0, vxfs allows for more than one volume (device, hence dev) in a single file system. In disklayout 7, a flag was added to signify that a file

Re: [Veritas-vx] storage checkpoints - quota

2008-09-23 Thread Scott Kaiser
Hi Przemyslaw, Have you looked at the existing quotas? http://sfdoccentral.symantec.com/sf/5.0/solaris/manpages/vxfs/fsckptadm_ 1m.html#429951 The -r option doesn't delete any checkpoints, it just makes each individual checkpoint 'removable'. Plus, it's been the default since 4.0, so unless you

Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 5.0 and 4.x keys

2008-10-07 Thread Scott Kaiser
4.x keys will work with 5.0 binaries. 5.0 keys will not, as a rule, work with 4.x binaries. Scott From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonfoey, Richard Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 10:29 AM To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-vx] Vxconfig doesn't start on reboot after patching

2008-10-20 Thread Scott Kaiser
Andrey, After speaking to a couple of developers, they think this is likely fixed by etrack 1416931 (sun id 6747492) which has been fixed and checked in. Regards, Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrey Dmitriev Sent: Thursday,