Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 4.1, vxconfigd issue

2007-10-29 Thread Dmitry Glushenok
Hello, Have you tried to use vxinstall to do things like creating volboot, removing install-db, etcetera? ashish madhavan wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a Sun 220R to which I have assigned 1000 luns of 45 Mb (this is > to simulation a case) from a symmetrix. Host details are - > > 1. SunOS

Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 4.1, vxconfigd issue

2007-10-29 Thread ashish madhavan
Thanks for your replies Dmitry and Mark. I had forgotten to run vxinstall. But even after I had it could not start vxconfigd.So I removed all VRTS packages did a reconfig boot and re-installed Veritas using the storage foundation 4.1 "installer" script which does the configuration and installat

Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 4.1, vxconfigd issue

2007-10-29 Thread Scott Kaiser
1000 isn't a particularly large number of LUNs, even for 4.1 (although 5.0 will handle such configurations much better and faster). Can you open a support case for this? Regards, Scott From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ashish madha

[Veritas-vx] Storage Foundation Manager add-ons

2007-10-29 Thread Dan Crowe
All, I'm dropping an e-mail to let the group know that the Dynamic Multi-pathing and Volume Migration add-ons for Storage Foundation Manager ("SFM") are now available. SFM version 1.1 was released in June 2007. SFM 1.1 includes support for up to 3,000 managed hosts as well as the introduction

Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 4.1, vxconfigd issue

2007-10-29 Thread ashish madhavan
Hi, Thanks for all the replies, I think I have got to know why this is happening with help from Mark. vxconfigd in debug mode shows that it fails after it finds a symmetrix VCM device. So I tried to exclude it from Vxvm's view by creating a /etc/vx/disks.exclude file but still it dumps on reac

Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 4.1, vxconfigd issue

2007-10-29 Thread Robinson, Greg
Have you installed the Array Support Library (ASL) for this particular storage array? Perhaps that knows what to do with the VCM device. Greg. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ashish madhavan Sent: Tuesday, 30 October 2007 1:21 P