Re: Stuck on quitting after latest update

2009-12-11 Thread dansterdan
I'm stuck on Quitting Versions Waiting for transactions to finish Same here... and I agree, killing it seems to do the job - the new version then starts up fine. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email

Re: proxy

2009-12-11 Thread Neoraptor
Hello, I would like to know if there is some progress on this features. I still can't use Versions for work because of the proxy support. Best regards, Neoraptor. On 2 nov, 15:58, Neoraptor neuhaus.jonat...@gmail.com wrote: 1. I would like to use http/https/socks 2. I think that the better

Re: Terrible user experience using Versions and Snow Leopard

2009-12-11 Thread Robin
The update fixed the apr_pool_cleanup issue I had, many many thanks for releasing this fix earlier. Excellent. On Dec 9, 10:57 pm, Dirk Stoop d...@madebysofa.com wrote: Shortest vacation ever, sorry ;) ETA is later this week.  We have a bigger update in the works, but since that one needs a

Re: Terrible user experience using Versions and Snow Leopard - Fixed

2009-12-11 Thread Dirk Stoop
Thanks Robin, I've taken the liberty to add the word Fixed to this discussion's topic. :) All the best, - Dirk the Versions team On Dec 11, 1:58 pm, Robin ro...@active8.nl wrote: The update fixed the apr_pool_cleanup issue I had, many many thanks for releasing this fix earlier. Excellent.

Re: proxy

2009-12-11 Thread Dirk Stoop
Hi Neoraptor, Progress is being made and we have a basic implementation of proxy support now. It was scheduled to be in the next update, but we've decided to release 1.0.7 first to take care of a couple of critical bugs, before we're done with fleshing out and testing new features like this one.

Heavy user of Versions, performs flawlessly

2009-12-11 Thread Lorin Rivers
Just wanted to say that not every user of Versions has terrible troubles. I find it works flawlessly for me and has since I first started using it (almost exclusively, anyway). -- Lorin Rivers Mosasaur: Killer Technical Marketing http://www.mosasaur.com mailto:lriv...@mosasaur.com 512/203.3198

Re: Heavy user of Versions, performs flawlessly

2009-12-11 Thread Asbjørn Ulsberg
I'd like to second this. Although there are a ton of features I'd like to see available, I think the way they are implemented in Versions and how the developers seem to take good time to let the features bake for the right time to just feel right before releasing it, is awesome. There's

Re: Heavy user of Versions, performs flawlessly

2009-12-11 Thread Quinn Taylor
Agreed. Versions performs admirably for me, and I'm not afraid to use Terminal to accomplish tasks it doesn't yet support. Just remember, that's what we used to have to do, for everything, back when there were no GUIs... ;-) I'm not saying I don't want to see the features, but I'm not one to

Re: Heavy user of Versions, performs flawlessly

2009-12-11 Thread Ray
Yep agreed. For me Versions : svn :: the Finder : Terminal `cd, ls, cp, mv` commands. You can do everything on the command line, but it's nice to use a (well-designed) GUI for the tedious stuff. -Ray On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Quinn Taylor quinntay...@mac.com wrote: Agreed. Versions

Re: Only ?? in my Timeline

2009-12-11 Thread Weitdenker
I have made a Screenshot: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/WQ9AmtCBCwunCnViCRnZgw?feat=directlink -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send

Re: Only ?? in my Timeline

2009-12-11 Thread Weitdenker
Here you can see the error in a Screenshot: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/9NQxqeLOye5jXlVbNaERgQ?feat=directlink -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe

Re: Only ?? in my Timeline

2009-12-11 Thread Quinn Taylor
It would probably be faster and simpler to use http://www.skitch.com/ or something similar for posting shots like this. (I don't have an answer for your question, unfortunately.) On Dec 11, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Weitdenker wrote: Here you can see the error in a Screenshot: