Since PPC support for Versions ended with 1.0.9 there have been 6 new
releases, each adding a variety of important updates that would not
seem to be items limited by OS architecture (eg. Subversion
compatibility, renaming items with ENTER, Blame on move/copy support,
etc., etc.)
I do recall you gu
But really, I had a quad processor G5 that was last made in 2006. That's 5
years ago. Apple doesn't even support the G5 anymore with the new OS or the
current one.
They might be fine machines (we even used a G4 for a server for a long time and
I still have my TI) but they aren't being made an
I have the hardware. Eight machines to be exact. Three of which are
a variety of Intel Macs and two of which are PPC Macs. They are all
running a variation of OS X versions. The other three others are
Windows XP, Vista and 7. I test on all of them and use SVN as my
bridge for getting updates o
I agree with you. Subversion works equally well on all of these machines,
why can't Versions? I think that's where the distinction needs to be made.
Versions is not Subversion. It's a pretty wrapper around it. To continue
using older machines, I think we need to accept this and learn the use the
to
Well said, TheDo. And you're right, I could work around this using
the Terminal, but I've come to love the GUI (and having grown up on
DOS and swearing as a kid that I'd *never* use a GUI, that says a
lot :) and Versions specifically.
For what it's worth, the other well-made OS X SVN client that
