+1 ! Pleasee I don't want to think that i pay for a incomplete
software that no have a simple basic feature of SVN... I don't want to
know how much votes this feature have, i want to know when this
feature will come (a date..).
Thankx!
On 23 mar, 13:39, Alberto Ganesh Barbati
wrote:
> +1 fo
Me too... i say for my friends to don't buy Versions again. The
Eclipse Integrated SVN Control Plugin is more better. I think, why i
bought and spend my money with Versions. They no add any value for me.
I'm repassing this mail for other mail lists and forums.
Thankx
--
The Future Begins To
hankx for you answer :) Sorry my English!
--
The Future Begins Today
Em 14/04/2009, às 17:11, Quinn Taylor escreveu:
>
> On Apr 14, 2009, at 12:09 PM, CodeWarrior wrote:
>
>> Me too... i say for my friends to don't buy Versions again. The
>> Eclipse Integrated SVN Cont
14, 2009, at 2:24 PM, CodeWarrior wrote:
>
>> Its a good answer for a evil e-mail. Sometimes, things like it
>> cause changes and impact peoples to do the certain things in the
>> right moment.
>>
>> Its one example of things that i say -> We have had proble
I work with Eclipse and in this week we pass a big problem again. My
developers rename the archive.java inside the Eclipse to
ArchiveDao.java (for exemplo). When they open the Versions, Version
say that file is missing and begin our problem. In a subeclipse, when
we rename a file, its auto
nts
> for working copies, so it automatically gets notified when files
> change and knows to update accordingly. I'd be curious to know what
> the actual state of the working copy is when you're seeing this
> symptom in Versions
>
> - Quinn
>
>
> On A
Subclipse in this case. If you made the change inside
> Eclipse, and Versions doesn't display what you'd expect, always turn
> to Terminal to see if the most basic SVN tools agree with Eclipse or
> not. That will help you know if the rename is being done correctly.
>
>
know. What i'm say? That
this is a very good feature that speed up our work, just it, not a Bug
report or a Version software problem.
Obrigado.
--
The Future Begins Today
Em 18/04/2009, às 11:49, Quinn Taylor escreveu:
>
> On Apr 18, 2009, at 12:06 AM, CodeWarrior wrote:
>
>
Quinn, forget :)
Thankx for your answer.
--
The Future Begins Today
Em 21/04/2009, às 12:18, Quinn Taylor escreveu:
>
> On Apr 20, 2009, at 4:55 PM, CodeWarrior wrote:
>
>>>> What we are doing now:
>>>>
>>>> 1 - Suppose that exist normal.java in a
To PT-BR, i'm here too!
Obrigado.
--
The Future Begins Today
Em 27/04/2009, às 19:41, Quinn Taylor escreveu:
> The devs seem to have done a pretty decent job of breaking the app
> into a number of .nib files, and there is a resource for localized
> strings, but my first impression is th
Quinn, Hi! Do you remenber me!? :) What is your experience with SL?
Are you seeing a true difference or everything its just propaganda?
Thankx!
--
The Future Begins Today
Em 30/07/2009, às 13:15, Quinn Taylor escreveu:
> I was of the impression that it worked fine on SL — I'm running the
by degrees as developers leverage
> the powerful new technologies. The Finder is definitely smoother and
> more polished, and there are numerous other little touches. I think
> you'll definitely find it worth the small investment. :-)
>
> - Quinn
>
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 11
12 matches
Mail list logo
