Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now

Well said Nev. Have any solution to the well defined problem?? I sure dont. 2010/1/26 Neville Gosling nev.gosl...@shaw.ca Just hold on a moment! The general trend in this conversation is that the VFB list is not what it used to be because it has less members now than in its

RE: [VFB] VFB Then Now

I have to agree in several respects. I've been a member of several fishing clubs over the years, most of which have folded for lack of participation. I'm a member, former president, of a local blues club w/ similar issues; 200+ members, less than 20 of whom attend most events perhaps 10 or 12

Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now

Nev., I agree with you- to a point. Yes, memberships are down, and that's a trend- I agree. My thought and 'soap-box' is that 200 VFB members could make for a very lively list if just those 200 participated. There'd be no reasons for lamentations and nostalgia if there were just 50, or even

Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now

Stepping up J Peculiar??? ducks and runs 2010/1/26 J Balmer jbal...@a5.com I have to agree in several respects. I've been a member of several fishing clubs over the years, most of which have folded for lack of participation. I'm a member, former president, of a local blues club w/ similar

Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now

Oh My Goodness. here comes Buggsy Bwahahahahahaha 2010/1/26 Don Ordes f...@tribcsp.com Nev., I agree with you- to a point. Yes, memberships are down, and that's a trend- I agree. My thought and 'soap-box' is that 200 VFB members could make for a very lively list if just those 200

Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now

Hello Don 2010/1/26 Don Ordes f...@tribcsp.com Nev., I agree with you- to a point. Yes, memberships are down, and that's a trend- I agree. My thought and 'soap-box' is that 200 VFB members could make for a very lively list if just those 200 participated. There'd be no reasons for

Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now -Suggestion

:* January 26, 2010 12:04 PM *To:* vfb-mail@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now Well said Nev. Have any solution to the well defined problem?? I sure dont. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the VFB Mail group. To post to this group

Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now -Suggestion

-- *From:* vfb-mail@googlegroups.com [mailto:vfb-m...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *David Colyn *Sent:* January 26, 2010 12:04 PM *To:* vfb-mail@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now Well said Nev. Have any solution to the well defined problem?? I sure dont

RE: [VFB] VFB Then Now -Suggestion

_ From: vfb-mail@googlegroups.com [mailto:vfb-m...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of David Colyn Sent: January 26, 2010 1:00 PM To: vfb-mail@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now -Suggestion Neville I hear you, however. (oops) Does one (collective) need the introduction

Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now -Suggestion

] *On Behalf Of *David Colyn *Sent:* January 26, 2010 1:00 PM *To:* vfb-mail@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now -Suggestion Neville I hear you, however. (oops) Does one (collective) need the introduction of new ideas (blood) to maintain the health of the genepool? Yes, I believe

Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now -Suggestion

@googlegroups.com [mailto:vfb-m...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of David Colyn Sent: January 26, 2010 12:04 PM To: vfb-mail@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now Well said Nev.   Have any solution to the well defined problem??   I sure dont.   -- You

Re: [VFB] VFB Then Now

Nev: I agree totally with you. There are soo many groups now compared to years ago, yet there are still only 24 hours in a day, so ppl are spread too thin. I think that is the problem.. Chuck - Original Message - From: Neville Gosling nev.gosl...@shaw.ca To: