[videoblogging] When the FBI knocks on your door...

2005-07-16 Thread Josh Wolf
Hey guys, haven't had the time to actually sit down to make a vlog post about this yet; things have been really crazy for the past couple days. So... you know how people sometimes joke around about how the FBI probably has a file on them, well, I think I can be pretty certain at this

Re: [videoblogging] Re: reality check?

2005-07-16 Thread R. Kristiansen
Hey all, Having been off-line for some time I missed all of this thread, and I suppose it is far too long already, but here is my take. Videoblogging is a medium, like paper. You can use the paper to write your personal journal, or you can write constitutions for countries on it. You can

[videoblogging] Re: Money Changers, out! (was: reality check?)

2005-07-16 Thread petertheman
At the same time, I've had conversations with corporate people about vlogs that ultimately revolve around one thing: MONEY. how can we milk this sucker. We can't generalize that everyone who works in coorporations has $$ as their first priority, but the way coorporations are set up (both

[videoblogging] Locking the Video Screen for Rights Protection

2005-07-16 Thread Andrew Baron
http://tinyurl.com/apym2 From Engadget: A lifetime of computing has taught me one thing: shortly after a new operating system hits the shelves, I end up upgrading my computer. Oh sureĀ… I do my best to limp along with the antiquated hardware. After all, my computer is always well within

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Videoblogging is reaching out

2005-07-16 Thread ryanne hodson
please dear jesus don't give them feedback on how to fix their feed they own everything already they have feeds it's called fox news am i wrong? i know i know good to have a diverse conversation happening wtf no. On 7/15/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I've been looking

[videoblogging] Re: Videoblogging is reaching out

2005-07-16 Thread ro9core
LOL their feeds are fox news --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ryanne hodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: please dear jesus don't give them feedback on how to fix their feed they own everything already they have feeds it's called fox news am i wrong? i know i know good to have a

Re: [videoblogging] Videoblogging is reaching out

2005-07-16 Thread Michael Sullivan
they'll be typcial sarcasm here... about this... where some will complain if they do get in this game and if they dont. balance is the way. dont let hatred, hype, spin and rhetoric lead you. you decide for yourself. research. and above all else, let all messages come through this medium. more

[videoblogging] hosting your own vlog info

2005-07-16 Thread golfdart
Hi Adam Depends on what format you want to stream. If WMP then you are looking at a windows server and an admin to plug the holes and attacks. Flash is emerging as the smallest file size versus quality and the easiest to stream using a FLash Communications Server Look at

Re: [videoblogging] Re: VlogMap Cluster Issue

2005-07-16 Thread Clint Sharp
petertheman wrote: As a first step, the mefeedia directory is available as OPML: http://mefeedia.com/feeds/opml.xml The goal is this: now, a new vlogger has to add their URL to like 5 services. We want it so that if you add it to 1 service, the others also pick it up :) Easy peasy.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: When the FBI knocks on your door...

2005-07-16 Thread Josh Wolf
The stringer rate varies by market... I live in San Francisco which I believe is ranked 5th or 6th in the country so it's probably one of the better markets for stringer footage. Here in SF the local stations pay between $150-165 for stringer footage... If you call a local station and talk

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Cocky Introduction

2005-07-16 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Yo Halcyon, No enclosures in your feedburner feed for spreading the pink. You gotta have those. That's how you distribute media files over RSS. - Check http://freevlog.org step #7. - Make sure you enable SmartCast option in FeedBurner (careful, this is different than SmartFeed even though

Re: [videoblogging] Money Changers, out!

2005-07-16 Thread David Yirchott
Charles, I am as much confused by this post as I am by the cluetrain website... You wrote: The corporate culture is smarmy. It's press releases written in impenetrable jargon And then, you wrote: None of them are screwball idealists dreaming of a breatharian diet. What they and I are

Re: [videoblogging] Money Changers, out!

2005-07-16 Thread Charles HOPE
David Yirchott wrote: Which I agree with. So there isn't anything to be upset about. It'll always conform to the will of the people. I think someone previously mentioned an amorphous revolution -- the overthrow of nothing. I am not trying to stir up trouble, but I am honestly not sure

Re: [videoblogging] Money Changers, out!

2005-07-16 Thread David Yirchott
Frank said: However, in reality, it's often much simpler (i.e more profitable) for an organization to adapt public opinion to suit its needs, rather than adapting the organization to meet the whims of the public. True, but as long as both needs meet up in the end, both sides are happy. If

Re: [videoblogging] Money Changers, out!

2005-07-16 Thread Deirdre Straughan
On 7/16/05, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, in reality, it's often much simpler (i.e more profitable) for an organization to adapt public opinion to suit its needs, rather than adapting the organization to meet the whims of the public. Actually, that's not so simple. First

Re: [videoblogging] Money Changers, out!

2005-07-16 Thread Charles HOPE
Deirdre Straughan wrote: On 7/16/05, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's more, I predict that the honest, open businesses are going to drive out the old school. The users are demanding it with their feet and dollars. Take a look at the Cluetrain Manifesto at