On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:28 PM, @sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do they NEED TO GET IT?
Why do we feel like we NEED THEM TO GET IT?
Co-Existing not feasible?
Is this about getting picked up by the old suits or is this about
Independents being able to leverage technology to publish their
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 7:01 AM, @sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
of interest...
http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/13/online-video-wheres-the-money/
Is advertising the only way to monetize on-line videos that all those
bright people in the Valley can think of? I watched one of the Web 2.0
gurus
But who says the networks have any obligation to hire the independents?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because people who deserve to be paid well for their excellent work are not
getting their due. That is all.
-Original Message-
From: @sull [EMAIL
We, what time are you meeting???
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Jacek Artymiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
But who says the networks have any obligation to hire the independents?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:37 PM, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]thejeffreytaylor%40gmail.com
wrote:
Because people
They don't have an obligation to independents at all, but they're being
massively stupid for missing out on opportunites to take on serialized
content that has establushed communities that are alpha-recommending
products and services left and right. Networks miss out, content creators
miss out,
i tryed to pay mike from blip to put my show in the blip player on the front
page, and like he said
madd mann you'll never be on the front page
i could of been a trend setter
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:30 PM, @sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well said.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:46 PM,
That would surprise me somewhat - you sure you werent deleted for other reasons?
Cheers
Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, liza jean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we figured this was coming. first two times youtube deleted us it
was after we got a million channel views. seemed
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Jeffrey Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They don't have an obligation to independents at all, but they're being
massively stupid for missing out on opportunites to take on serialized
content that has establushed communities that are alpha-recommending
products
I really enjoy saying all the thing you do as well, Jacek. The problem is that
it's time the funding sources of all types stop seeing this as experimental and
something for later. The goods are there NOW.
-Original Message-
From: Jacek Artymiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That would surprise me somewhat - you sure you werent deleted for
other reasons?
Cheers
Steve Elbows
as we are PG-13 - no nudity, foul language (unless you count puns) or
violence - why we get deleted from one
Im not claiming things are done fairly, I simply refute the idea that
popularity alone is going to get you kicked off youtube. Its more
likely to get you noticed, so if there is something they object to
about your content they are more likely to notice and go through with
it than if you only had 3
No doubt that there is truth in the expressed misconceptions of what
Independent Net Media encompasses.
I dont even know the best terminology these days and language always helps
define ( whats a vlog? ;)
User Generated Content is NOT EpicFu. So yeah that must be annoying to
hear. But I wonder
Despite being a negative person and setting my expectations rather
low, things havent met my expectations.
I never believed the hype and silly advertising projections, even
without the economic storm I dont think all would be well in the world
of web 2.0 also known as 'where's the revenue?'
I know. The money thing. It's a big problem, when you don't have it
and I don't want to trivialize it, as I personally know how it feels
when you don't have it and can't tell when it will be coming.
In times like these you need to scale down and work within the
limitations of the format. I had to
Wont investors see it as experimental and very high risk unlss there
are more examples of people getting a return on their investment?
Maybe I am missing some success stories, where are they? Doesnt help
that the handful of early stars seem to have failed to capitalize on
their position.
What
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What Ive found most annoying is the halfhearted way that those who
have received some backing, have been treated. We've seen several
shows get picked up by new media networks who then seem to have no
clue what to do with
Hostgator blows.
I need a new web host for my blog. I'm sick of trying to get into my
blog and always running into a problem. What's a good host that some
of you use?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, bmilam52 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hostgator blows.
I need a new web host for my blog. I'm sick of trying to get into my
blog and always running into a problem. What's a good host that some
of you use?
I use seekdotnet.com. It isn't perfect -- no host is,
I've asked around on Twitter about this.
A lot of people use and like Dreamhost, and they have various nice
things like automatic Wordpress installation.
If you need a bit more, people seem to like MediaTemple.
If you want to go green - in light of the data-centers-polluting-more-
For my rich clients I use Rackspace. The best of the best.
For my poor clients I always use steadfast.net. Cheap n cheerful.. Reliable
so far, surprisingly good customer service.
--
David Terranova
www.davidterranova.com | blog.davidterranova.com | www.rebelrave.tv
From: bmilam52 [EMAIL
Oh yeah, I¹ve got some sites on mediatemple, but they all seem to have
bandwidth problems (even though each site has a lot of dedicated bandwidth)
and connection errors.
--
David Terranova
www.davidterranova.com | blog.davidterranova.com | www.rebelrave.tv
From: Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Though no host is perfect, I use Laughing Squid because I know him and he
helps fund local (san francisco) arts functions with the money.
And if you just an easy WP install for your videoblog, the Artist Discount
is pretty good:
http://laughingsquid.net/
Schlomo Rabinowitz
http://schlomo.tv -
OK, I've been searching high and low for a low-cost solution to this
that doesn't involve using phone lines. Essentially it boils down to
this: I live in LA. My co-host lives in Seattle. We'd like to record a
live conversation with similar quality between our voices, meaning I
don't want my voice
Rupert made this cool hack to embed the hi-res version of Youtube videos:
http://www.twittervlog.tv/high-quality-youtube-embed-generator.html
This guy has a post with some more detailed i fo about the process here:
http://blog.jimmyr.com/High_Quality_on_Youtube_11_2008.php
Jay
--
In podcasting, this is a technique referred to as a double ender
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-ender
WhatTheCast, my audio podcast, is recorded as a multi ender (same
idea, but four hosts). We do a conference call via Skype, and each
host sends me their end of the conversation as a WAV
I'm gonna just use Netrillium -- one of my fav blogs uses them. Plus they have
a 2.99 plan. I just wanna get back up.
Matthew Milam
http://blogcritics.org/writer/matthew_milam -- My Blogcritics Writings
http://mmilam.newsvine.com -- My Newsvine Column
http://bmilam.com --
November 14, 2008, 2:36 pm
Internet Video in Korea Eclipses the DVD
By Saul Hansell
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/14/for-warner-internet-video-in-korea-eclipses-dvd/?hp
dreamhost, reasonably reliable, cheap, have a green policy and also
host NGO content for free.
On 15/11/2008, at 6:11 AM, bmilam52 wrote:
I need a new web host for my blog. I'm sick of trying to get into my
blog and always running into a problem. What's a good host that some
of you use?
- Original Message -
From: Dom
(snip)
The video portion will utilize voice-over while our content plays
beneath. We may also use animation or puppets along with our voices.
Anyway, you can see that it would be less than ideal to have the
voices at different qualities. Are there any
You're right, I should specify my idea of cost. I'm thinking a decent
mic on both ends (some cardioid condenser) run through an amp of some
sort into the computer. Preferably under $150 for the set (so $300
total for me and my co-host) though I've seen a wide variance with
regard to price and
Whoops, meant to say I have a Shure SM7B, not a SM57. Yikes... can I
go home yet?
Dom
http://www.gadzookfilms.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Dom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right, I should specify my idea of cost. I'm thinking a decent
mic on both ends (some cardioid condenser)
popularity with not a single extra cent going to youtube is one
hypothesis about our deletion dilemma, but i think someone is hugely
angry that we routinely expose the fact that spandex is not actually
a protective layer. the idea that it is is planted early and often
in children's
Am quite happy with Dreamhost.
Ruud Elmendorp
Video Journalist Africa
http://www.videoreporter.nl
On 11/14/08, David Terranova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh yeah, I¹ve got some sites on mediatemple, but they all seem to have
bandwidth problems (even though each site has a lot of dedicated
33 matches
Mail list logo
