There's been a idea that has been promoted to not define
Videoblogging. That it is too soon, that defining it will lock it
down and constrain it, and so on. The error is that a model,
definition, thesis is required to test if something is viable. You
don't discover something by not applying a
oxymoron alert!
there is no such thing as a correct model
otherwise it would not be a model
all models are approximations
someday even physicist's will realize this and stop looking for the
right one
once a model is stamped correct, all you have is dogma
Enric wrote:
That model may be
_expression_ is key to defining vlogging in my mind.
Randolfe (Randy) Wickerhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/
- Original Message -
From:
Enric
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 7:57
AM
Subject: [videoblogging] Define
Videoblo
To:
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 7:57
AM
Subject: [videoblogging] Define
Videoblogging
There's been a idea that has been promoted to not
defineVideoblogging. That it is too soon, that defining it will lock
itdown and constrain it, and so
In my opinion vlogging is not a modele ( there is x modele of vlogging)
may be a spirit
the feeling of the media's mastering
Loiez
Le 17 déc. 05 à 20:03, Enric a écrit :
Or perhaps they are not. There's no contradiction between having a
model and putting it in action (doing).
-- Enric
