Re: [videoblogging] Pete Prodoehl and Josh Kenberg

2005-10-08 Thread Adam Quirk
On 10/7/05, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I prefer bloglines for web based aggregators. Here is my valuable collection of personal/rocketboom feeds: http://www.bloglines.com/public/hamletheretoo I could live on pizza and bloglines. If all I had was bloglines and food, I

Re: [videoblogging] Pete Prodoehl and Josh Kenberg

2005-10-07 Thread David Meade
If you want a web based aggrigator, check out MeFeedia.com. Peter Vandijck's got some good stuff going there. I do really like that interface of the link you provided, but Ant's huge value is it's downloading/syncing. Seems to make more sense to request this sort of feature from MeFeedia which

Re: [videoblogging] Pete Prodoehl and Josh Kenberg

2005-10-07 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Hey, I have no problems with web-based readers. To each their own. I simply do not find them very useful or efficient for watching video or doing the things that I want to do with video. Honestly, I hope this Google Reader gets better soon. Its very hard to use. If you want a web-based video

Re: [videoblogging] Pete Prodoehl and Josh Kenberg

2005-10-07 Thread andrew michael baron
I prefer bloglines for web based aggregators. Here is my valuable collection of personal/rocketboom feeds: http://www.bloglines.com/public/hamletheretoo I could live on pizza and bloglines. On Oct 7, 2005, at 10:34 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote: Hey, I have no problems with web-based readers. To

Re: [videoblogging] Pete Prodoehl and Josh Kenberg

2005-10-07 Thread Devlon
FireAnt does kick ass for actually queuing up a bunch of videos and it pulls them locally so you can easily do mash-ups, etc. Plus you guys have really put together a really slick interface. On 10/7/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, I have no problems with web-based readers.