Steve and Zadi are pioneering not only a format, but the very landscape of New
Media.
They produce an excellent, entertaining show about modern culture, and I feel
they
shouldn't be forced to defend their professionalism and talent.
Chris McCaleb
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,
Steve and Zadi are pioneering not only a format, but the very landscape of
New Media.
They produce an excellent, entertaining show about modern culture, and I
feel they shouldn't be forced to defend their professionalism and talent.
Agreed. I'm sorry that if anyone got a different
Here, here. I consider Epic-Fu to be THE break-out hit of the year.
On Dec 25, 2007, at 2:03 PM, cfmccaleb wrote:
Steve and Zadi are pioneering not only a format, but the very
landscape of New Media.
They produce an excellent, entertaining show about modern culture,
and I feel they
Well thats pretty bad. If we are going to talk about 'moral aspects' of
vlogging, then Id say
the stuff you've mentioned is just as important as advertising standards.
Blogging and vlogging has the potential to repeat a lot of the worst of
traditional
journalism. Its good to give warning to
Maybe arguing is one of the easiest forms of collaboration or conversation, and
thats why
such things always generate the most traffic.
It also hints that vlogging will never lead to the death of the sitcom or
cheesy drama ;)
Im no language specialist but I wouldnt be at all surprised if
Steve, you are 100% correct. I meant to state that in my comments
section when I originally added that I contacted you, but somehow
omitted it, and for that I emphatically apologize. I want to point out
that I did make a correction and disclose that fact in my comments
yesterday - the comment is
Seems like everything's been said that needs to be said, at least as
far as the EPIC-FU / advertising topic goes. We appreciate all the
clarification and support of the group.
As we said in our response video, Cheryl's core question about what is
an ad and what isn't is a completely valid one.
Some old school journalistic sensibilities need to pervade these
discussions
Dude!
Maybe my journalism degree is not as worthless as I thought!
Happy Holidays everyone:)
Terry Ann Rendon
www.terryannonline.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Woolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems
Terry, Cheryl's post was not an accusation.. She didn't state anything
that needed backing up. And the post (how many times does this have
to be said) wasn't about targeting Epic-Fu, they were used as an
example illustrating how she COULDN'T know what was behind the product
usage - in a post that
Hello Brooke
Cheryl's post was not an accusation
Yes, Cheryl didn't directly accuse anyone of anything. But questions,
perhaps fairly or unfairly, have a way of appearing as so. And she did
say, Since I don't know, I don't trust. That's strong language in my
book.
And the post (how many times
Excuse me.
Cheryl sent us an email letting us know she would be criticizing our
content for being bubble gum content. We responded with examples of
the important issues we try to bring up, the interests of our
audience, and so forth.
At no point did she ever ask us about sponsored links, how we
Depite some Inflammatory and knee jerk comments, it seems like a giant
win for all concerned.
Brook, how can your livelihood being threatened by your professional
integrity being called into question be a win for us?
We are out there doing this with no safety net. Our show depends on
its
I know I'm not the most knowledgable person when it ones to Christian
holidays, but can I still toss those sorts of people away for Lent?
Maybe that question is for a more religious listserv...
On 12/24/07, Steve Woolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depite some Inflammatory and knee jerk comments,
Wow. Well, I didn't take Cheryl's post as questioning your integrity.
If anything it seemed like there was an assumption because of who you
guys are that everything was probably being done with integrity, but
the problem was that there was no way for anyone to know that. Again,
basic media
On the other hand, aspects of ensuing discussions make me fear that
any discussion that touches on sensitive personal or livelihood
matters for anyone involved will devolve, no matter how things are
originally expressed, into this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdzLFNELeCI
Steve,
I just got finished reading all these posts here on the list surrounding all
this.
As you already know, I am the one that called you guys corporate whores on
Twitter. Yep.
A pretty harsh statement to make.
After watching your response video and pondering on what you guys said, I cant
16 matches
Mail list logo
