[videoblogging] Re: I did THIS to embed Flash onto Wordpress

2006-01-10 Thread Klaas
This works; A link to a popup window see http://vlogmatic.com (testing fase) (you need the player I asume) img src=http://vlogmatic.com/videos/testswf.gif; alt= style=cursor:pointer; onclick=window.open ('http://vlogmatic.com/videos/test.swf','mywindow','width=320,height= 240') / --- In

Re: [videoblogging] Re: I did THIS to embed Flash onto Wordpress

2006-01-10 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Yet again here's a Wordpress plugin for embedding Flash Video. With this, all you do is upload your FLV, insert a simple tag in your blog entry, and you're done. This is the most elegant implementation of Flash Video for independent videobloggers I've seen yet.

[videoblogging] Re: I did THIS to embed Flash onto Wordpress

2006-01-05 Thread Edmund Yeo
Bump. Just in case it was missed the first time around. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Edmund Yeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something like this: table object width=385 height=300/object/p param name=movie value=http://www.vsocial.com/v/27a6cf5f60794e7eb92c175ded7458e2;/param

[videoblogging] Re: I did THIS to embed Flash onto Wordpress

2006-01-05 Thread LeanBackVids.com
No offense, but that code is a disaster. There are tons of HTML errors. Here is some better code... http://www.vlogmap.org/code.txt The first object block should be used inside HTML if you are not concerned about making pages XHTML valid. The second part has two parts and is XHTML-valid

[videoblogging] Re: I did THIS to embed Flash onto Wordpress

2006-01-05 Thread LeanBackVids.com
The code on freevideocoding.com is limited since it only does the embed tag and not the wrapping object code. Also, the use of object or embed tags will not be XHTML-valid unless you use JavaScript. I'm anal about pages being valid. That way I can justify telling IE users who have issues to get

Re: [videoblogging] Re: I did THIS to embed Flash onto Wordpress

2006-01-05 Thread Michael Sullivan
that's right... i remember noticing the lack of object tag at freevideocoding. nerissa - fix that up! ;-)On 1/5/06, LeanBackVids.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The code on freevideocoding.com is limited since it only does theembed tag and not the wrapping object code.Also, the use of object or

Re: [videoblogging] Re: I did THIS to embed Flash onto Wordpress

2006-01-05 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 20:50:49 +0100, LeanBackVids.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, the use of object or embed tags will not be XHTML-valid unless you use JavaScript. It's still not valid. Hiding the tags from the validator doesn't make the code valid. object might be made valid xhtml, but

[videoblogging] Re: I did THIS to embed Flash onto Wordpress

2006-01-05 Thread LeanBackVids.com
Very true, but it is as valid as it is going to be. As far as I know, there is no way around the invalid embed tag. Of course you could opt to not embed video, but the user experience is then reduced. Personally, I dislike going to a vlog and having the movie load in its own window. Embedded

Re: [videoblogging] Re: I did THIS to embed Flash onto Wordpress

2006-01-05 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
Do'nt get me wrong. I use the same technique (I replace a href= with an embedded video using javascript). Just pointing out it's not valid. Sadly I think some browsers require the embed when it comes to embedded video, so flash satay might not work with video unless you're only aiming for

[videoblogging] Re: I did THIS to embed Flash onto Wordpress

2006-01-05 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 20:50:49 +0100, LeanBackVids.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, the use of object or embed tags will not be XHTML-valid unless you use JavaScript. It's still not valid. Hiding the

Re: [videoblogging] Re: I did THIS to embed Flash onto Wordpress

2006-01-05 Thread John Dowdell
Andreas Haugstrup wrote: It's still not valid. Hiding the tags from the validator doesn't make the code valid. object might be made valid xhtml, but embed can never be valid xhtml. That's because the HTML 4.0 spec itself did not validate to existing browsers -- EMBED was used before