Re: [videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone

2007-04-09 Thread Mike Meiser
While I do find the conversation about journalism interesting I find the most important point to be something entirely different. What rights do we have to be secure in our property... particularly our videos and other intellectual property. If the police can sopena Josh's video footage anytime

[videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone

2007-04-09 Thread Enric
A slippery slope is from the angle of whose looking. There is no absolute right that any social group has: government prosecutors, journalists, citizen, et. al. The decision is judged by the situation based on human rights and values. -- Enric --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone

2007-04-09 Thread Patrick Cook
Hi everyone: On 4/8/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Besides, I don't think Josh has EVER referred to himself as an anarchist. Have you Josh? http://web.archive.org/web/2005123539/http://joshwolf.net/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone

2007-04-09 Thread Patrick Cook
Hi everyone: On 4/9/07, Mike Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not even going to say wether Josh was right or wrong... but I both respect him and am tremendously grateful to him that he's driving the discussion and pressing the point. He pressed it enough to get the attention of PBS. The

[videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone

2007-04-09 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone: On 4/8/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Cook patsvideoblog@ wrote: Besides, I don't think Josh has EVER referred to himself as an anarchist.

[videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone

2007-04-08 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone: On 4/4/07, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting article http://hotzone.yahoo.com/b/hotzone/blogs28294;_ylt=AjL7tlWL.cedgomrWP1 qsXOs0NUE It is HOWEVER. (Quotes from the article

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone

2007-04-08 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello, On 4/8/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone: On 4/4/07, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting article

[videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone

2007-04-08 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, On 4/8/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Cook patsvideoblog@ wrote: Hi everyone: On 4/4/07, Heath heathparks@ wrote:

[videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone

2007-04-05 Thread francisco_daum
Saunders sounds too bureaucratic; Sites unforgiving putting him on the spot. Josh Wolf doesn't have to make a choice right there and then. Josh Wolf is identified with anarchists , some with violent reputations, and the US Government is not going to have it. Perhaps he will continue his coverage

[videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone

2007-04-05 Thread Enric
This is an interesting area of discussion. While Josh says that the idea of objectivity in journalism is the problem. He also states his supreme interest is in the truth. I haven't seen these highly abstract ideas thoroughly explained which leads people to different conclusions on what Josh and