[videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-21 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Heh. Am just catching up on the ton of messages from weekend and see Calacanis also has commented, too, re youtube. http://www.calacanis.com/2006/02/20/youtube-is-not-a-real-business/ Methinks there's more to

[videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-21 Thread Enric
Here's one on youtube that I like: http://www.youtube.com/?v=GComtrp3QPU - Enric -=- http://www.cirne.com Determine Media --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Heh. Am just catching up on the ton of messages from weekend and see Calacanis

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-21 Thread robert a/k/a r
WSJ today talks about Brightcove, big media and the adverts model: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114048979543678723.html? mod=home_page_one_us -- cheers r Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively my vlog: http://r.24x7.com good deal : http://foo.24x7.com Yahoo! Groups Links *

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-21 Thread Caution Zero
--- robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone explain why youtube (and vimeo) constantly entertain? Both have a method for discover that works. That's valuable. i'd be interested to hear more about why you say this. i find youtube to be a swamp that consistently tries my patience. i'm

[videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-21 Thread Bill Streeter
That's what I was going to say. I haven't found much on Youtube worthwile much less consistantly entertaining. There seems to be a ton of garbage on there--teens dancing in their underware, lip syncing crap like that. That's not to say that there isn't anything good on there, it's just not too

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-21 Thread robert a/k/a r
Is quite simple actually. Both Youtube and Vimeo have implemented good UI features. Some sites feel like dead ends, others you are always at crossroads. Go log onto Vimeo, watch any movie, then glance around at the other movies linked on that page. It's simple, clear and, importantly, it

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-21 Thread robert a/k/a r
Correct. You have to find something you like and then it's easy to find more like it. Same at myspace. Both sites are wildly successful. On Feb 21, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Bill Streeter wrote: That's what I was going to say. I haven't found much on Youtube worthwile much less consistantly

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Garfield
I was watching a few videos on YouTube today and they were painful. Lots of buffering and stopping... Plus they were clips from network TV. I'm glad the networks are putting more of their videos online themselves, although am not happy that SNL, MTV and Comedy Central require PC's for viewing

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-21 Thread Michael Sullivan
and what happened to the send-to-friend feature? it used to be a flash overlay form and now its a horrible looking popup window... i find that so strange... at least format the form nicely. On 2/21/06, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was watching a few videos on YouTube today and they

[videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-21 Thread Chuck Olsen
anyone with a WSJ subscription care to share this, publicly or privately? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: WSJ today talks about Brightcove, big media and the adverts model: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114048979543678723.html?

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-21 Thread robert a/k/a r
WSJ Reprints: http://webreprints.djreprints.com/1413650118976.html On Feb 21, 2006, at 6:48 PM, Chuck Olsen wrote: anyone with a WSJ subscription care to share this, publicly or privately? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: WSJ today talks

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-21 Thread Markus Sandy
interesting graph, very misleading placement right next to a header that says "sharp increase" - but the header is not referring to the data in the chart about video downloads and watching, it's referring to the sharp increase in broadband adoption (i.e., cable tv) keep in mind that they

[videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-20 Thread David Howell
Your subject line is misleading. This has nothing to do with vlogging. This is a case of copyright violation. David http://www.taoofdavid.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I read an interesting article today about how NBC made You Tube stop

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-20 Thread Joshua Kinberg
I wrote a blog entry about this recently: http://www.joshkinberg.com/blog/archives/2006/02/nbc_sends_youtu.php Viral marketing is one thing... pirating another creator's content and redistributing it as your own is plaigarism at best and infringement at worst. YouTube is at fault here for not

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Networks afraid of vlogging?

2006-02-20 Thread robert a/k/a r
Heh. Am just catching up on the ton of messages from weekend and see Calacanis also has commented, too, re youtube. http://www.calacanis.com/2006/02/20/youtube-is-not-a-real-business/ Methinks there's more to the youtube popularity. I'm probably one of the hardest peeps convince to test a new