On 7/22/05, Andreas Haugstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Suppose you could submit a video comment to a video that you watched
> > on your TV? Does it then become a vlog?
>
> Not really. You're lacking important aspects. Like a permalink. If I can't
> link to you, you're not a part of the
I know this is really evil, and I hope I don't get kicked of the list,
but I just posted an email in another thread that is, I think, really
relevant to this thread, so I'm copying it again below ... Richard,
the dual thread poster and sometimes thread starter .. hee hee hee
**
Recently m
Like often happens when i read/watch/listen to people here I agree... but its besides the point.
vlog came from blog. so you need to have some of what makes a blog a blog...
all these other points are fine, but it doesnt diffuse the fact that a videoblog (vlog) is still a blog.
take for
Hey,
Thanks for mentioning our "zany" tv show/performance art/theater
show/burlesque side show/independant film/video blog.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/thisorthat-video
Our show (for lack of any other all encompassing media term)
translates well into many different forms of media, because i
Comments are interactive, but I don't think that's *the* element of blog-ness.
Its the linkability, the interconnectedness. The fact that I can link
out and be linked in.
That's the more important interaction going on that TV does not have.
-Josh
On 7/22/05, Deirdre Straughan <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:17:48 +0200, Deirdre Straughan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't necessarily disagree with what anyone's saying here, but let
> me play devil's advocate (as I often do)...
I can respect that. :o)
> Not necessarily passive. Look at what TV and movie fans are doing
I don't necessarily disagree with what anyone's saying here, but let
me play devil's advocate (as I often do)...
On 7/22/05, Joan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My personal answer is "no" because: Vlogs are interactive in nature.
> You can communicate with the vlogger online, comment, critisize
After I spoke with David Pogue at Macworld, he promoted the idea of
adding an RSS 2.0 feed with enclosures to those videos, to the higher
ups at the NY Times.
Then it'll be even more bloggy.
On Jul 21, 2005, at 11:26 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> While I was reading this mail, I happened to s
On 7/21/05, Eric Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a reminder, the nature of TV is changing. "TV" doesn't necessarily refer to boxes in the
> living room. So, my question is, "What is TV becoming?"
While I was reading this mail, I happened to surf onto this thingamiebob:
http://www.nytimes.
Vlogs as TV is about as contreversial as the definition of vlogging.
I personally define vlogging as blogging but utilizing videos.
But it does present an interesting issue, if vlogs are presented on
TV, is it still a vlog?
My personal answer is "no" because: Vlogs are interactive in natur
As a reminder, the nature of TV is changing. "TV" doesn't necessarily refer to boxes in the
living room. So, my question is, "What is TV becoming?"
ER
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email t
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "pomoartchick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> thanks to everyone for your responses so far on the topic of vlogs as
> art. some interesting thoughts on the matter are being raised.
> vlogging as art is a subject i have been hashing around for a while on
> my
12 matches
Mail list logo
