Eddie,
As of last week, the secondary producer clause was struck down (yay!).
Blip.tv can't get into trouble for some jerk posting porn to their
service.
I say can't, but everyone needs to be aware that individual DA's
have prosecuted (and persecuted) people for selling/providing adult
material
Stephanie,
Can you point me to any documentation on this secondary producer
clause and what it means?
I've been wondering about how sites like iFilm.com and YouTube.com
persist seemingly without liability even though they willfully display
content they have no right to broadcast (SNL clips and
Secondary producer is a part of the 2257 wording which (in my
understanding) is strictlly for porn, and used under the pretense of
stopping child porn. (age of performers documentation, etc.)
It is not related to using others' content.
-Halcyon
On 1/2/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Eddie,
As of last week, the secondary producer clause was struck down (yay!).
Blip.tv can't get into trouble for some jerk posting porn to their
service.
I say can't, but everyone needs to be aware that
My mistake-- sorry. I've been away from vlogging for too long and
forgot everyone's face.
On 1/2/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LOL, Stephanie. I don't work at blip.tv or have a open server for
video content.
Enric wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
... and the
resulting legal quagmire can land Enric and all the blip.tv servers ...
LOL, Stephanie. I don't work at blip.tv or have a open server for
video content.
As Halcyon said-- this is only relating to pornography, not copyright.
Under the new rules, sites that redistribute adult content (including
websites) would have had to maintain a separate copy of the
documentation (drivers license, model release form, age verification
form) of each actor
Yeah-- my boneheaded mistake. I know better, too!
--Steph
On 1/2/06, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enric wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
... and the
resulting legal quagmire can land Enric and all the blip.tv servers ...
That was an EXCELLENT summary of 2257! Well said!
-Halcyon
On 1/2/06, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Halcyon said-- this is only relating to pornography, not copyright.
Under the new rules, sites that redistribute adult content (including
websites) would have had to maintain a
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 23:28:15 +0100, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
time. Each subsequent offense is worth 10 years, and the rules were
supposedly retroactive, meaning they could get you for not having
documentation even before you were required to keep it.
I'd like to call
Wooof!! nicely siad andreas,
By the way it was me who posted this originally Leave Enric alone, he's a nice guy.
Paul
On 2 Jan 2006, at 22:37, Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 23:28:15 +0100, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> time. Each subsequent offense is
On 1/2/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 23:28:15 +0100, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
time. Each subsequent offense is worth 10 years, and the rules were
supposedly retroactive, meaning they could get you for not having
documentation even
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enric wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
... and the
resulting legal quagmire can land Enric and all the blip.tv
servers ...
LOL, Stephanie. I
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Paul Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wooof!! nicely siad andreas,
By the way it was me who posted this originally Leave Enric alone,
he's a nice guy.
Paul
Except on 3vil ;)
On 2 Jan 2006, at 22:37, Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
On Mon, 02
Charles Hope wrote:
Paul Knight wrote:
Dear all,
On the subject of Pornography, something seems to have slipped through
the net and landed writhing on the pages of blip.tv It is also
happening in Dailymotion. Although a lot softer core. The video I am
talking about is called XXX and was
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Halcyon Lujah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We
as a part-time professional pornographer, I feel like I should say
*something*...
Sexual content is just a type of content. Like extreme sports. If it
is labeled properly, I don't see the problem.
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 12:17:54AM -, Enric wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Halcyon Lujah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We
as a part-time professional pornographer, I feel like I should say
*something*...
Sexual content is just a type of content. Like extreme
There's also a deluge of spam on open systems. Actions to hold itback are worthy.
Spam, Dupes, Tests, and non-vlog video content are some of the reasons why I have chosen not to pull in all the 'feeds' that exist out there onto my site at vlogdir.com. Someone needs to take a few minutes of
18 matches
Mail list logo
