(late reply)
I think one day people will be shooting / making video / media as stringers
and sell that to people who need video / media, likely businesses who can
afford to pay. another layer to news program's stringers/freelancers but on
any topic, not just news. ala Neal Stephenson's Snow
oh, also, which is why I think ads on videos is an old media way of
thinking. like ads on tv. (which will phase into product placements
soon enough). people will still use them now whilst they make money
from them but I don't think they'll be necessary or used in future as
they'll be regarded as
I haven't been following this thread, but did catch your thoughts on
vloggers having a marketable commodity for the mass market.
I recently did a vlog that speaks about our community selling
Lumiere's to Digital Picture Frame consumers.
http://vlog.mikemoon.net/2007/07/thinking-lumieres.html
Of Chuck
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:29 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: the ugly truth about online video
This made me recall what Bill Gates said back in January:
http://newteevee.
http://newteevee.com/2007/01/29/gates-tv-is-doomed
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: the ugly truth about online video
This made me recall what Bill Gates said back in January:
http://newteevee.
http://newteevee.com/2007/01/29/gates-tv-is-doomed/
com/2007/01/29/gates-tv-is-doomed/
Ad dollars
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thing is that I cant actually think of many people here who
believe otherwise. OK maybe occasionally someone who hasnt put in
insane amounts of effort into their vlog, wonders why they arent being
noticed and
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, caminofilm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
interesting article about predictions for online video advertising
http://mediabiz.blogs.cnnmoney.com/2007/07/27/the-ugly-truth-about-online-video/
I already said that back on February 19, 2007:
This made me recall what Bill Gates said back in January:
http://newteevee.com/2007/01/29/gates-tv-is-doomed/
Ad dollars to video is not going to change from TV overnight, but there
WILL be a change over time and a significant one at that.
Chuck
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Chuck
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:29 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: the ugly truth about online video
This made me recall what Bill Gates said back in January:
http://newteevee. http://newteevee.com
/
http://mefeedia.com - Discover, Collect, and Share video blogs
_
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Chuck
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:29 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: the ugly truth about online video
: [videoblogging] Re: the ugly truth about online video
This made me recall what Bill Gates said back in January:
http://newteevee.
http://newteevee.com/2007/01/29/gates-tv-is-doomed/
com/2007/01/29/gates-tv-is-doomed/
Ad dollars to video is not going to change from TV overnight
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:29 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: the ugly truth about online video
This made me recall what Bill Gates said back in January:
http://newteevee.
http://newteevee.com/2007/01/29/gates-tv-is-doomed
Hey Bill,
Long time no see. How's it going?
On Aug 2, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Bill Cammack wrote:
I seriously don't know why people expect videos about uninteresting
(except to the audience of ten) topics to EVER be monetized.
sometimes things are of interest to an audience larger than
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Bill,
Long time no see. How's it going?
On Aug 2, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Bill Cammack wrote:
I seriously don't know why people expect videos about uninteresting
(except to the audience of ten) topics to
Bill,
I think your points are all spot on, but the landscape is nonetheless
going to experience dramatic change over the next few years. That
doesn't mean the vlogging community will be the beneficiaries of that
change. Big money and big media are no doubt already planning
strategies and
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, pouringdownpix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack BillCammack@
wrote:
I seriously don't know why people expect videos about uninteresting
(except to the audience of ten) topics to EVER be monetized. As far
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill,
I think your points are all spot on, but the landscape is nonetheless
going to experience dramatic change over the next few years. That
doesn't mean the vlogging community will be the beneficiaries of that
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I seriously don't know why people expect videos about uninteresting
(except to the audience of ten) topics to EVER be monetized. As far
as I know, there's not an example YET of that happening. If anyone
knows of
That's a zillion times *more* interesting than most monetized video.
Brook
On 8/2/07, pouringdownpix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
never YET? never EVER?
uninteresting videoblog monetized, if only for a moment:
http://pouringdown.tv/?p=161
--
daniel, pouringdown.tv
--
Absolutely.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I agree, Chuck. I'm not saying that people shouldn't do what they
want to do and what they love to do and HOPE to get paid to do it.
I'm just saying it's more of a longshot than I've seen discussed in
The thing is that I cant actually think of many people here who
believe otherwise. OK maybe occasionally someone who hasnt put in
insane amounts of effort into their vlog, wonders why they arent being
noticed and propelled to the giddy heights, but generally it seems
like most people know that it
21 matches
Mail list logo
