Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Critics Analysis

2005-09-27 Thread Adam Quirk
http://xolo.tv/ Gabe and Gabe review vlogs there sometimes. They haven't in a while, though, with VlogEurope and all.  Maybe if you all start emailing them, they'll get back on it! -AQ bullemhead.com SPONSORED LINKS In

Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Critics Analysis

2005-09-27 Thread Deirdre Straughan
On 9/27/05, BevSykes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As a professional theatre critic, I can see that "criticism" for vlogging would have to be done the way I do theatre--different standards for "professional" and for "amateur."  Tricky business. Especially since this group has sometimes seen bot

Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Critics Analysis

2005-09-27 Thread BevSykes
>>I would, too, and imagine it will come as vlogging moves into the mainstream consciousness. We have movie critics, TV critics, and book critics - why not vlog critics? As far as this group goes, the prevailing ethos seems to be "we want to encourage vlogging, so it's all wonderful." Which

Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Critics Analysis

2005-09-27 Thread Devlon
We need to institute a 36 hour day :) Vlogworkshop is a great idea (imho) and it would be great to keep up. But yeah, we are all really busy. And it seems we just get busier. I haven't had a chance to even post a videoblog in weeks. On 9/27/05, Mat Wall-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Than

Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Critics Analysis

2005-09-27 Thread Mat Wall-Smith
Thanks...thats what I was looking for...I hope this picks up again. Although looking at the list of contributors I wonder what hours in the day these people can possibly have left!! On 27/9/05 11:22 PM, "Devlon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There was a critical (very constuctive-critisism) video

Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Critics Analysis

2005-09-27 Thread Devlon
There was a critical (very constuctive-critisism) videoblog at http://vlogworkshop.blogspot.com/ but it seems to have stalled, which is a shame as I thought it was a really good thing ...hint, hint to others who are involved ;) On 9/27/05, Mat Wall-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > >

Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Critics Analysis

2005-09-27 Thread Deirdre Straughan
So go ahead. You're as qualified as anybody to be a vlog critic, probably more so since you've been watching them for a while and obviously care. And we both agree that Zadi's work is fantastic, so in my book, you're a smart critic. On 9/27/05, Mat Wall-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ye

Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Critics Analysis

2005-09-27 Thread Mat Wall-Smith
Title: Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Critics Analysis Yeah...I completely understand that attitude...or I did up until a few months ago when it got much busier round here. Now I’d like the really great stuff get its due – the stuff that is really attempting more than just a personal diary...not

Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Critics Analysis

2005-09-27 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:15:15 +0200, Deirdre Straughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would, too, and imagine it will come as vlogging moves into the > mainstream > consciousness. We have movie critics, TV critics, and book critics - why > not > vlog critics? Everyone is a critic. That's how

Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Critics Analysis

2005-09-27 Thread Deirdre Straughan
I would, too, and imagine it will come as vlogging moves into the mainstream consciousness. We have movie critics, TV critics, and book critics - why not vlog critics? As far as this group goes, the prevailing ethos seems to be "we want to encourage vlogging, so it's all wonderful." Which is o

[videoblogging] Vlog Critics Analysis

2005-09-27 Thread Mat Wall-Smith
Hi Is anyone doing a critical vlog site. I really enjoyed reading the bare bones reading and analysis of Zadi's post in The New York Times. It was good to see another level of engagement and understanding being practiced/developed. Zadi's work really does deserve this level of engagement and I