On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 19:47:39 +0100, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
They also have it backwards. We should not have to opt out of their
aggregation, but rather opt in to it. I don't like it either.
If you provide a syndication feed of your content, aren't you already
presumably
On 11/4/05, Ted Tagami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a site relies on traffic to it's pages for revenue, then this could be shown to be criminal.
They also have it backwards. We should not have to opt out of their
aggregation, but rather opt in to it. I don't like it either. Their
opt-out
On 11/4/05, Lynn Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice that blogtelevision.net is taking all of the videos that I
put up and placing them on their site.
Are you under the impression that they're making copies, Lynn?
These guys are about the same as the old i638 (or whatever they were)
people,
On 11/4/05, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can you be precise about what the problem is, so that other
videoblog aggregators can avoid making you feel badly treated?
Well if my videos were up there I'd be upset because they present the
content as if they are the site of origin.
My CC
That's why it's a good idea to have your url in you video somewhere? I put mine at the end. On 11/4/05, Lynn Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Here's my issue. They take my videos and place them on their site
without giving any credit to the authors. They provide no links to the
original content.
If a site relies on traffic to it's pages for revenue, then this could be shown to be criminal.
They also have it backwards. We should not have to opt out of their
aggregation, but rather opt in to it. I don't like it either. Their
opt-out page seems broken.On 11/4/05, Lynn Lane [EMAIL
